Lily's Kitchen Fish & Chips Wet Dog Food
Wet Pate complete High meat Clear label
Is Lily's Kitchen Fish & Chips Wet Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 78/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 78 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributes +7.2 to this total, alongside the meat content which adds +6.7. Conversely, ingredients without printed percentages deduct -4.2, while printing percentages on the label provides a further boost of +3.2.
32% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe78
- Nutritionalmedium98
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with chicken, herring and white fish as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Scores 78, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
- Meat makes up an estimated 58% of the dry matter (60% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
Why you might not
- High in fat: 25% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 10.20%
- Fat
- 5.50%
- Fibre
- 0.40%
- Ash
- 2.60%
- Moisture
- 78%
Energy: 100 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 20 mg; Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Glycine Hydrate) 25 mg; Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Glycine Hydrate) 1.4 mg; Copper (Copper Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 1.0 mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.75 mg
Feeding guide
Feed in line with our feeding guideline
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists herring
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 25.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (28%) | Chicken | meat | medium | 28 | 28.0 |
| 2 | Herring (22%) | Herring | meat | good | 22 | 22.0 |
| 3 | White Fish (10%) | White Fish | meat | good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 4 | Potatoes (4%) | Potatoes | carb | medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 5 | Peas (4%) | Peas | veg | good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 6 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 2.8 |
| 7 | Dill (0.1%) | Dill | veg | good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 8 | Sage | Sage | veg | good | - | 2.7 |
| 9 | Apple Cider Vinegar | Vinegar | additive | poor | - | 2.6 |
| 10 | Goldenrod | Goldenrod | veg | good | - | 2.5 |
| 11 | Nettle | Nettles | veg | good | - | 2.4 |
| 12 | Aniseed | Aniseed | veg | good | - | 2.3 |
| 13 | Rosehips | Rose Hip | veg | good | - | 2.2 |
| 14 | Marigold Flowers | Calendula | veg | good | - | 2.1 |
| 15 | Cleavers | Cleavers | veg | good | - | 2.0 |
| 16 | Chickweed | Chickweed | veg | good | - | 1.9 |
| 17 | Alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg | good | - | 1.8 |
| 18 | Milk Thistle | Milk Thistle | veg | good | - | 1.8 |
| 19 | Dandelion Root | Dandelion Root | veg | good | - | 1.7 |
| 20 | Burdock Root | Burdock Root | veg | good | - | 1.6 |
| 21 | Celery Seeds | Celery Seeds | veg | good | - | 1.5 |
Brand
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 0207 433 1863
- Address
- 1st floor Kings Court, 2-16 Goodge Street, London, W1T 2QA
- Contact page
- www.lilyskitchen.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.lilyskitchen.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.915 | +7.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 58.0% | 0.116 | +6.73 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.113 | -0.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.7% | -0.002 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.0% | 0.177 | +1.42 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.8% | -0.009 | -0.08 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.6% | -0.045 | -0.12 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.056 | +0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 31.9% | -0.131 | -4.18 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 58.0 | -0.073 | -4.25 |
| Additive penalty | -3.11 | 0.236 | -0.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.915 | +7.18 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 58.0% | 0.116 | +6.73 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.5% | -0.113 | -0.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.088 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.7% | -0.002 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 8.0% | 0.177 | +1.42 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 8.8% | -0.009 | -0.08 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.6% | -0.045 | -0.12 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.056 | +0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 31.9% | -0.131 | -4.18 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 58.0 | -0.073 | -4.25 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.11 | 0.236 | -0.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.16
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 77.7
- Final score
- 78/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 78/100 | current |
| v1 | 76/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 10.2 | 46.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.5 | 25 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.4 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 87.6 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 100 | 454.5 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (68.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 13.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| potatoes (a good source of potassium (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| peas (containing dietary fibre) (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| nutritionally complete, meaning it has everything your little friend needs (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and balanced (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain-free recipe (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with natural ingredients (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with proper meat, offal and fish (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with freshly prepared chicken, herring and white fish with potatoes (a good source of potassium and peas (containing dietary fibre) (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lily's Kitchen
Alternatives to Fish & Chips Wet Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.