Lenda VET Allergenic Solution
Dry Extruded complete
Is Lenda VET Allergenic Solution a good dog food?
We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 53 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.3 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.7 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -7 points. Additionally, ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -13.1 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe53
- Nutritionalmedium97
- Transparency35
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with hydrolysed white fish, rice and potato starch as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 25.50%
- Fat
- 14%
- Fibre
- 3.10%
- Ash
- 7%
- Carbohydrates
- 0%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 2.40%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 3.90%
- Calcium
- 1.50%
- Phosphorus
- 1.30%
Energy: 374 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed poultry liver
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry liver
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists hydrolysed white fish
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hydrolyzed white fish | Hydrolysed White Fish | meat | good | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Potato starch | Potato starch | carb | poor | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Peas | Peas | veg | good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb | good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | refined Duck oil | Duck | meat | medium | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil | good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | hydrolyzed poultry liver | Hydrolysed Poultry Liver | meat | medium | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | dehydrated Apple pulp | Apple Fibre | fibre | medium | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | dehydrated Krill (Euphausia superba, source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin) | Krill | meat | good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | FAEC Digestive (yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS and nucleotides), Chicory root (inulin source), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Mentha, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Chicory root | veg | good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | FAEC Inmune (Panax ginseng, Punica granatum, Zingiber officinale, Urtica dioica, Camellia sinensis, Curcuma longa, microalgae oil Schizochytrium sp. (source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids)) | Microalgae Oil | oil | good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Enterococcus Faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement | good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Lactobacillus Plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement | good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Lactobacillus Acidophilus | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement | good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Lactobacillus Rhamnosus | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | supplement | good | - | 4.1 |
Brand
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.915 | +7.74 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 28.5% | 0.116 | +3.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.5% | -0.113 | -1.64 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.1% | -0.088 | -1.42 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 30.6% | -0.009 | -0.27 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.045 | -0.32 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.915 | +7.74 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 28.5% | 0.116 | +3.30 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.5% | -0.113 | -1.64 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.1% | -0.088 | -1.42 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.6% | -0.002 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 30.6% | -0.009 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.045 | -0.32 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 3.194 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | -0.073 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Subtotal
- 53.2
- Final score
- 53/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.5 | 27.7 (band 18 to 40%) | 96.5 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.1 | 3.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.6 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.3 | 1.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 79.2 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 374 | 406.5 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Complete veterinary complete food for adult dogs with food allergies (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| This feed facilitates the reduction of intolerance to ingredients and nutrients (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essential fatty acids (on pack) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| Limited, selected and hydrolyzed protein sources (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Probiotics and functional foods that will strengthen the immune and gastrointestinal systems (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hip & Joints (glucosamine, chondroitin, MSM) (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Digestive / intestinal health (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Immune system support (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hydrolyzed white fish (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin (on pack) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids (on pack) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| Selected carbohydrate sources (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lenda
Alternatives to VET Allergenic Solution
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.