veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Our verdict
Is Lenda VET Allergenic Solution a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with hydrolysed white fish, rice and potato starch as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed poultry liver
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry liver
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists hydrolysed white fish
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25.50% · Fat 14%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 25.50% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 3.10% |
| Ash | 7% |
| Carbohydrates | 0% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 2.40% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 3.90% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1.30% |
Energy: 374 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 26.0%
- supplement 23.1%
- carb 21.5%
- veg 17.2%
- oil 6.3%
- fruit 5.9%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hydrolyzed white fish | Hydrolysed White Fish | meat · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | Potato starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | Sweet Potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | refined Duck oil | Duck | meat · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | Salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | hydrolyzed poultry liver | Hydrolysed Poultry Liver | meat · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | dehydrated Apple pulp | Dried Apples | fruit · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | dehydrated Krill (Euphausia superba, source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin) | Krill | meat · good | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | FAEC Digestive (yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS and nucleotides), Chicory root (inulin source), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Mentha, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | FAEC Inmune (Panax ginseng, Punica granatum, Zingiber officinale, Urtica dioica, Camellia sinensis, Curcuma longa, microalgae oil Schizochytrium sp. (source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids)) | Microalgae | veg · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Enterococcus Faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement · good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Lactobacillus Plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement · good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Lactobacillus Acidophilus | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement · good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Lactobacillus Rhamnosus | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Hydrolyzed white fish7.7% estimated
- 2. Rice7.5% estimated
- 3. Potato starch7.2% estimated
- 4. Peas7.0% estimated
- 5. Sweet Potato6.8% estimated
- 6. refined Duck oil6.6% estimated
- 7. Salmon oil6.3% estimated
- 8. hydrolyzed poultry liver6.1% estimated
- 9. dehydrated Apple pulp5.9% estimated
- 10. dehydrated Krill (Euphausia superba, source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin)5.7% estimated
- 11. Brewer's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)5.4% estimated
- 12. FAEC Digestive (yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS and nucleotides), Chicory root (inulin source), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Mentha, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum)5.2% estimated
- 13. FAEC Inmune (Panax ginseng, Punica granatum, Zingiber officinale, Urtica dioica, Camellia sinensis, Curcuma longa, microalgae oil Schizochytrium sp. (source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids))5.0% estimated
- 14. Enterococcus Faecium4.8% estimated
- 15. Lactobacillus Plantarum4.5% estimated
- 16. Lactobacillus Acidophilus4.3% estimated
- 17. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus4.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Lenda
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The food reached a score of 47 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages pulled the score down by -10.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7 points. The processing format reduced the score by -6.7, and the carbohydrate content lowered it by a further -1.7 points. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.01 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.115 | -1.74 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.092 | -0.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 31.9% | -0.012 | -0.39 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.065 | -0.47 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.060 | +0.43 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.01 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.115 | -1.74 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 9.4% | -0.092 | -0.87 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.005 | -0.05 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 31.9% | -0.012 | -0.39 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.065 | -0.47 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.060 | +0.43 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 46.7
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25.5 | 28.2 (band 18.596685082872927 to 40%) | 96.9 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.5 (band 5.68232044198895 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.1 | 3.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.7 (band 0.5165745856353591 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.3 | 1.4 (band 0.41325966850828727 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 79.2 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 374 | 413.3 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Complete veterinary complete food for adult dogs with food allergies (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| This feed facilitates the reduction of intolerance to ingredients and nutrients (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Essential fatty acids (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Limited, selected and hydrolyzed protein sources (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Probiotics and functional foods that will strengthen the immune and gastrointestinal systems (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hip & Joints (glucosamine, chondroitin, MSM) (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Digestive / intestinal health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Immune system support (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hydrolyzed white fish (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Selected carbohydrate sources (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.