Lenda Urinary-Struvite
Dry Extruded complete
Is Lenda Urinary-Struvite a good dog food?
We score it 50/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 50 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.3 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -13.1. Additionally, the processing format deducted -7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -2.9.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe50
- Nutritionalmedium77
- Transparency45
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with rice, corn flour and hydrolysed chicken protein as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- Low in protein: 15% protein on a dry-matter basis.
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 14.50%
- Fat
- 19%
- Fibre
- 2.10%
- Ash
- 4.80%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.34%
- Calcium
- 0.70%
- Phosphorus
- 0.50%
- Sodium
- 0.20%
Energy: 408.3 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A (3a672a) 10000 IU/Kg; Vitamina D3 (3a671) 1500 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (3a700) 110 mg/Kg; Vitamina K3 (3a710) 7 mg/Kg; Vitamina B1 (3a820) 3 mg/Kg; Vitamina B2 7 mg/Kg; Vitamina B6 (3a831) 3 mg/Kg; Vitamina B12 0,04 mg/Kg; Niacina (3a314) 12 mg/Kg; Ácido Pantoténico (3a841) 10 mg/Kg; Ácido Fólico (3a316) 15 mg/Kg; Biotina (3a880) 4.4 mg/Kg; Vitamina C (3a300) 50 mg/Kg; Betaína (3a921) 100 mg/Kg; Manganeso (3b502) 44,5 mg/Kg; Hierro (3b106) 95 mg/Kg; Cobre (3b406) 13 mg/Kg; Yodo (3b201) 2,2 mg/Kg; Selenio (3b801) 0,33 mg/Kg; Zinc (3b606) 110 mg/Kg
Technological additives
Conservantes; Antioxidantes (extractos de origen natural ricos en tocoferoles procedentes de aceites vegetales (1b306(i))); Aglomerantes
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 14.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (17)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Whole rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | maize flour | Corn flour | carb | medium | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | hydrolysed chicken protein | Hydrolysed Chicken Protein | meat | medium | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | refined chicken oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | maize gluten | Maize gluten | carb | poor | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | fish oil | Fish Oil | oil | good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | lignocellulose | Lignocellulose | fibre | medium | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | dried egg | Dried Egg | meat | medium | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | dried apple pulp | Apple Fibre | fibre | medium | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | marine zooplankton flour (Krill, source of omega 3 fatty acids) | Wheat | carb | poor | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | Moringa oleifera | Moringa Oleifera | veg | good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | FAEC Complete (Yucca schidigera Extract, Yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a source of MOS and Nucleotides), Glucosamine, chondroitin sulphate, Methylsulfonylmethane, Chicory root, Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Minthostachys verticillata | veg | medium | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | FAEC Digestive (Yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS and Nucleotides), Chicory root (source of Inulin), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Minthostachys verticillata | veg | medium | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | Enterococcus Faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement | good | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | Lactobacillus Plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement | good | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Lactobacillus Acidophilus | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement | good | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | Lactobacillus Rhamnosus | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | supplement | good | - | 4.1 |
Brand
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.915 | +5.27 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 18.2% | 0.116 | +2.11 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.113 | -2.87 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.088 | -1.55 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.3% | -0.009 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.8% | -0.045 | -0.30 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.8% | 0.056 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.236 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.915 | +5.27 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 18.2% | 0.116 | +2.11 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 25.5% | -0.113 | -2.87 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.088 | -1.55 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.1% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.3% | -0.009 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 6.8% | -0.045 | -0.30 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.8% | 0.056 | +0.38 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 3.194 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | -0.073 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.20 | 0.236 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 50.2
- Final score
- 50/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 50/100 | current |
| v1 | 50/100 | |
| v1.9 | 50/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14.5 | 15.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 61.3 |
| Fat | 19 | 20.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.1 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.8 |
| Calcium | 0.7 | 0.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 77.8 |
| Phosphorus | 0.5 | 0.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 77.2 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 94 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 408.3 | 443.8 | 50 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Portion-control flag: 408.3 kcal/100g as fed with fat at 20.7% dry matter, above the reference band. High-energy foods need smaller portions.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Alimento dietético completo para perros adultos para la disolución de cálculos de estruvita y reducción de la reaparición de cálculos de estruvita (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Propiedades de subsaturación o de metaestabilización de la orina para la estruvita y propiedades de acidificación de la orina (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ayuda a la reducción de la reaparición de cálculos de estruvita y disolución de Cálculos de Estruvita (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Uso de probióticos recomendado para ayudar a desplazar células patógenas y favorecer la flora intestinal (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contenido de Magnesio <0,18% (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lenda
Alternatives to Urinary-Struvite
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.