veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Our verdict
Is Lenda Renal & Oxalate a good dog food?
We score it 44/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with rice, maize flour and chicken oil and fat as the main ingredients.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for protein, calcium, phosphorus.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken oil and fat
- Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 14.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 14.50% · Fat 18%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 14.50% |
| Fat | 18% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 4.30% |
| Calcium | 0.40% |
| Phosphorus | 0.30% |
| Sodium | 0.20% |
Energy: 399.7 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A (3a672a) 10000 IU/Kg; Vitamina D3 (3a671) 1500 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (acetato de-todo-rac-alfa-tocoferilo)(3a700) 110 mg/Kg; Vitamina K3 (3a710) 7 mg/Kg; Vitamina B1 (3a820) 3 mg/Kg; Vitamina B2 7 mg/Kg; Vitamina B6 (3a831) 3 mg/Kg; Vitamina B12 0,04 mg/Kg; Niacina (3a314) 12 mg/Kg; Ácido Pantoténico (3a841) 10 mg/Kg; Ácido Fólico (3a316) 15 mg/Kg; Biotina (3a880) 4,4 mg/Kg; Vitamina C (3a300) 50 mg/Kg; Betaína (3a921) 100 mg/Kg; Manganeso (como óxido de manganeso (II))(3b502) 44,5 mg/Kg; Hierro (como quelato de hierro (II) de aminoácido hidratado)(3b106) 95 mg/Kg; Cobre (como quelato de cobre de aminoácido hidratado)(3b406) 13 mg/Kg; Yodo (como Yoduro de potasio)(3b201) 2,2 mg/Kg; Selenio (como Selenito de sodio)(3b801) 0,33 mg/Kg; Zinc (como Quelato de Zinc de aminoácido hidratado)(3b606) 110 mg/Kg
Technological additives
conservantes; antioxidantes (extractos de origen natural ricos en tocoferoles procedentes de aceites vegetales (1b306(i))); aglomerantes
Ingredients (21)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 28.4%
- veg 25.4%
- supplement 14.0%
- oil 11.3%
- fibre 10.1%
- unknown 5.7%
- meat 5.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brown rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 2 | maize flour | Maize Flour | carb · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 3 | refined chicken oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 6.0 |
| 4 | maize gluten* | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 5.8 |
| 5 | animal protein hydrolysate (poultry and pork)* | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 5.7 |
| 6 | wheat gluten protein* | Wheat Gluten | carb · poor | - | 5.5 |
| 7 | fish oil | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 5.4 |
| 8 | lignocellulose | Lignocellulose | fibre · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 9 | dried egg* | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 10 | dried apple pulp | Apple Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 11 | sweet potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 4.8 |
| 12 | peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 13 | green beans | Green Beans | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 14 | carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 4.3 |
| 15 | artichoke | Artichoke | veg · good | - | 4.2 |
| 16 | FAEC Complete (Yucca schidigera Extract, Yeast Products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a source of MOS and Nucleotides), Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulphate, Methylsulfonylmethane, Chicory Root, Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Minthostachys verticillata | veg · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 17 | FAEC Digestive (Yeast Products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Source of MOS and Nucleotides), Chicory Root (Source of Inulin), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum) | Minthostachys verticillata | veg · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 18 | Enterococcus Faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement · good | - | 3.7 |
| 19 | Lactobacillus Plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement · good | - | 3.6 |
| 20 | Lactobacillus Acidophilus | Dried Lactobacillus acidophilus Fermentation Product | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 21 | Lactobacillus Rhamnosus | Lactobacillus rhamnosus | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
- 1. Brown rice6.3% estimated
- 2. maize flour6.1% estimated
- 3. refined chicken oil6.0% estimated
- 4. maize gluten*5.8% estimated
- 5. animal protein hydrolysate (poultry and pork)*5.7% estimated
- 6. wheat gluten protein*5.5% estimated
- 7. fish oil5.4% estimated
- 8. lignocellulose5.2% estimated
- 9. dried egg*5.1% estimated
- 10. dried apple pulp4.9% estimated
- 11. sweet potato4.8% estimated
- 12. peas4.6% estimated
- 13. green beans4.5% estimated
- 14. carrot4.3% estimated
- 15. artichoke4.2% estimated
- 16. FAEC Complete (Yucca schidigera Extract, Yeast Products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a source of MOS and Nucleotides), Glucosamine, Chondroitin Sulphate, Methylsulfonylmethane, Chicory Root, Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum)4.0% estimated
- 17. FAEC Digestive (Yeast Products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Source of MOS and Nucleotides), Chicory Root (Source of Inulin), Salvia rosmarinus, Melissa officinalis, Taraxacum officinale, Salvia officinalis, Minthostachys verticillata, Vaccinium macrocarpon, Cynara scolymus, Silybum marianum)3.9% estimated
- 18. Enterococcus Faecium3.7% estimated
- 19. Lactobacillus Plantarum3.6% estimated
- 20. Lactobacillus Acidophilus3.4% estimated
- 21. Lactobacillus Rhamnosus3.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Lenda
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product received a score of 44 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, where the label shows ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -10.6 points. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.8 points. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +3.7 points. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.74 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 33.2% | -0.115 | -3.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.8% | -0.092 | -1.55 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.3% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.3% | -0.065 | -0.73 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.8% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -0.17 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.74 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 33.2% | -0.115 | -3.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.8% | -0.092 | -1.55 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.7% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 19.3% | -0.012 | -0.24 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 4.2% | -0.027 | -0.11 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.3% | -0.065 | -0.73 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.8% | 0.060 | +0.35 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.17 | 0.222 | -0.04 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 43.7
- Final score
- 44/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 14.5 | 16 (band 19.874585635359114 to 40%) | 56.4 |
| Fat | 18 | 19.9 (band 6.0727900552486185 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.4 | 0.4 (band 0.5520718232044198 to 2.5%) | 56 |
| Phosphorus | 0.3 | 0.3 (band 0.4416574585635359 to 1.6%) | 52.5 |
| Sodium | 0.2 | 0.2 (band 0.11041436464088397+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 90 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 399.7 | 441.7 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 20 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamina A (3a672a) 10000 IU/Kg
- Vitamina D3 (3a671) 1500 IU/Kg
- Vitamina E (acetato de-todo-rac-alfa-tocoferilo)(3a700) 110 mg/Kg
- Vitamina K3 (3a710) 7 mg/Kg
- Vitamina B1 (3a820) 3 mg/Kg
- Vitamina B2 7 mg/Kg
- Vitamina B6 (3a831) 3 mg/Kg
- Vitamina B12 0,04 mg/Kg
- Niacina (3a314) 12 mg/Kg
- Ácido Pantoténico (3a841) 10 mg/Kg
- Ácido Fólico (3a316) 15 mg/Kg
- Biotina (3a880) 4,4 mg/Kg
- Vitamina C (3a300) 50 mg/Kg
- Betaína (3a921) 100 mg/Kg
- Manganeso (como óxido de manganeso (II))(3b502) 44,5 mg/Kg
- Hierro (como quelato de hierro (II) de aminoácido hidratado)(3b106) 95 mg/Kg
- Cobre (como quelato de cobre de aminoácido hidratado)(3b406) 13 mg/Kg
- Yodo (como Yoduro de potasio)(3b201) 2,2 mg/Kg
- Selenio (como Selenito de sodio)(3b801) 0,33 mg/Kg
- Zinc (como Quelato de Zinc de aminoácido hidratado)(3b606) 110 mg/Kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "< 22% de proteína" — supported by the declared low protein data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcalinizantes de la orina (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alimento dietético completo para perros jóvenes y adultos de todas las razas, ayuda a la función renal en caso de insuficiencia renal crónica e insuficiencia renal pasajera (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ayuda a la función renal en IRC (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Reducción cálculos Oxalato (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Proteínas y Fósforo de alta calidad (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Bajo contenido de Calcio y vitamina D (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| < 22% de proteína (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Apto para patologías cardiovasculares, cálculos de Xantina y Cistina (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.