Lenda Urban First Bites Puppy

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

Urban First Bites Puppy
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Lenda Urban First Bites Puppy a good dog food?

We score it 51/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with chicken, dried pork and beef protein and hemoglobin as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

62% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • High in protein: 30% protein on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
  • Doesn't list lamb, venison, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
  • Your dog avoids beef: the label lists dried pork and beef protein
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dried pork and beef protein
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 30% · Fat 18%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein30%
Fat18%
Fibre3%
Ash6.50%
Calcium1.60%
Phosphorus1.20%

Energy: 390.4 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamina A 10000 UI/Kg; Vitamina D3 1500 UI/Kg; Vitamina E (acetato de todo-rac-α-Tocoferilo) 110 mg/Kg; Manganeso (como óxido de manganeso (II))(3b502) 44,5 mg/Kg; Hierro (como quelato de hierro (II) de aminoácido hidratado)(3b106) 95 mg/Kg; Cobre (como quelato de cobre de aminoácido hidratado)(3b406) 13 mg/Kg; Yodo (como Yoduro de potasio)(3b201) 2,2 mg/Kg; Selenio (como Selenito de sodio)(3b801) 0,33 mg/Kg; Zinc (como Quelato de Zinc de aminoácido hidratado)(3b606) 110 mg/Kg

Technological additives

conservantes y antioxidantes (Tocoferoles de aceites vegetales)

Ingredients (15)62% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • oil 42.0%
  • meat 19.3%
  • carb 17.6%
  • fibre 13.9%
  • supplement 7.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
126% ChickenChickenmeat · medium2626.0
2dehydrated Pork and BeefDried Pork and Beef Proteinmeat · medium-4.7
3HaemoglobinHemoglobinmeat · medium-4.7
4hydrolysed ChickenHydrolysed Chickenmeat · medium-4.7
5Maize*Maize / Corncarb · medium-6.2
6Poultry Fat 12%Poultry Fatoil · medium1212.0
7Barley*Barleycarb · medium-5.9
8Rice*Rice - whitecarb · medium-5.6
9EggEggmeat · good-5.3
10Carob* (Ceratonia siliqua)Carobfibre · medium-5.0
11LignocelluloseLignocellulosefibre · medium-4.6
12Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-4.3
13Fish OilFish Oiloil · good-4.0
14Brewer's Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of mannanoligosaccharides MOS)Brewer's Yeastsupplement · good-3.7
15MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-3.4
  1. 1. 26% Chicken26% declared26.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. dehydrated Pork and Beef4.7% estimated
    Dried Pork and Beef Protein · meat · medium
  3. 3. Haemoglobin4.7% estimated
    Hemoglobin · meat · medium
  4. 4. hydrolysed Chicken4.7% estimated
    Hydrolysed Chicken · meat · medium
  5. 5. Maize*6.2% estimated
    Maize / Corn · carb · medium
  6. 6. Poultry Fat 12%12% declared12.0% estimated
    Poultry Fat · oil · medium
  7. 7. Barley*5.9% estimated
    Barley · carb · medium
  8. 8. Rice*5.6% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  9. 9. Egg5.3% estimated
    Egg · meat · good
  10. 10. Carob* (Ceratonia siliqua)5.0% estimated
    Carob · fibre · medium
  11. 11. Lignocellulose4.6% estimated
    Lignocellulose · fibre · medium
  12. 12. Beet Pulp4.3% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  13. 13. Fish Oil4.0% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  14. 14. Brewer's Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of mannanoligosaccharides MOS)3.7% estimated
    Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
  15. 15. Minerals3.4% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09

Brand and contact: Lenda

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-09
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
shop.lenda.net

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This food earned an overall score of 51 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, while ingredients without printed percentages added -6.5 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.6 points. The oil and fat content contributed -4.4 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.60
Carb share of dry matter17.7%-0.115-2.04
Oil share of dry matter47.5%-0.092-4.37
Supplement share of dry matter7.5%-0.012-0.09
Undeclared quantities62.0%-0.106-6.55
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.60
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter17.7%-0.115-2.04
Oil share of dry matter47.5%-0.092-4.37
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter7.5%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities62.0%-0.106-6.55
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
51.0
Final score
51/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v351/100current
v255/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein3033.1100
Fat1819.9100
Calcium1.61.889.5
Phosphorus1.21.3100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3100
Energy (kcal/100g)390.4431.4100

Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamina A 10000 UI/Kg
  • Vitamina D3 1500 UI/Kg
  • Vitamina E (acetato de todo-rac-α-Tocoferilo) 110 mg/Kg
  • Manganeso (como óxido de manganeso (II))(3b502) 44,5 mg/Kg
  • Hierro (como quelato de hierro (II) de aminoácido hidratado)(3b106) 95 mg/Kg
  • Cobre (como quelato de cobre de aminoácido hidratado)(3b406) 13 mg/Kg
  • Yodo (como Yoduro de potasio)(3b201) 2,2 mg/Kg
  • Selenio (como Selenito de sodio)(3b801) 0,33 mg/Kg
  • Zinc (como Quelato de Zinc de aminoácido hidratado)(3b606) 110 mg/Kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (38% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)7.6/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "sin trigo, ni conservantes o colorantes químicos" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.

3 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
suplementos y alimentos funcionales que favorecen la digestión y el bienestar general (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
sin trigo, ni conservantes o colorantes químicos (on page)Free-fromcontradictedManufacturer assertion
ALTO CONTENIDO CÁRNICO (40%) (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
elaborada sin conservantes ni colorantes químicos (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Urban First Bites Puppy

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Lenda

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.