Our verdict
Is Lenda Sensitive a good dog food?
We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with potato starch, white fish and chicken oil and fat as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed poultry
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists white fish
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 25% · Fat 14%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 25% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 3% |
| Ash | 9% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.53% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.79% |
| Calcium | 2.10% |
| Phosphorus | 1.30% |
Energy: 343 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A 18000 U.I.; Vitamina D3 1800 U.I.; Vitamina E (α-tocoferol) 120 mg; Condroitin sulfato 500 mg; Glucosamina sulfato 500 mg; MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg; Hierro 195 mg (como carbonato ferroso); Yodo 2,2 mg (como yoduro potásico); Cobre 13 mg (como sulfato cúprico pentahidratado); Manganeso 44,5 mg (como óxido manganoso); Zinc 185 mg (como óxido de zinc); Selenio 0,33 mg (como selenito sódico)
Technological additives
Conservantes y antioxidantes (extractos de cítricos y tocoferoles)
Ingredients (18)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 38.4%
- meat 24.4%
- supplement 16.4%
- carb 7.3%
- oil 6.9%
- fibre 6.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 7.3 |
| 2 | White Fish | White Fish | meat · good | - | 7.1 |
| 3 | Refined Chicken Oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 6.9 |
| 4 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 5 | Whole Flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 6.5 |
| 6 | Chicken Hydrolysate | Hydrolysed Poultry | meat · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 7 | Dried Whole Egg | Dried Whole Egg | meat · good | - | 6.1 |
| 8 | Glucosamine Sulphate | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 5.9 |
| 9 | Chondroitin Sulphate | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 5.7 |
| 10 | MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) | MSM | supplement · good | - | 5.5 |
| 11 | Brewer's Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 12 | Krill | Krill | meat · good | - | 5.1 |
| 13 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 14 | Chicory Root (source of prebiotic FOS) | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 4.6 |
| 15 | prebiotic MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | Yucca Extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | Blueberries | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | Nucleotides. | Nucleotides | supplement · medium | - | 3.8 |
- 1. Potato Starch7.3% estimated
- 2. White Fish7.1% estimated
- 3. Refined Chicken Oil6.9% estimated
- 4. Beet Pulp6.7% estimated
- 5. Whole Flaxseed6.5% estimated
- 6. Chicken Hydrolysate6.3% estimated
- 7. Dried Whole Egg6.1% estimated
- 8. Glucosamine Sulphate5.9% estimated
- 9. Chondroitin Sulphate5.7% estimated
- 10. MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)5.5% estimated
- 11. Brewer's Yeast5.3% estimated
- 12. Krill5.1% estimated
- 13. Minerals4.8% estimated
- 14. Chicory Root (source of prebiotic FOS)4.6% estimated
- 15. prebiotic MOS4.4% estimated
- 16. Yucca Extract4.2% estimated
- 17. Blueberries4.0% estimated
- 18. Nucleotides.3.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Lenda
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
3 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 49 out of 100. The inclusion of ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, and the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.8 points, while being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points to the final evaluation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.0% | -0.115 | -0.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.2% | -0.012 | -0.31 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 32.1% | -0.027 | -0.85 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.3% | -0.065 | -0.47 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.3% | 0.060 | +0.44 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.78 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 3.0% | -0.115 | -0.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 11.4% | -0.092 | -1.05 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 25.2% | -0.012 | -0.31 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 32.1% | -0.027 | -0.85 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.3% | -0.065 | -0.47 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.3% | 0.060 | +0.44 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 49.2
- Final score
- 49/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25 | 27.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 96.7 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3 | 3.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 2.1 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.3 | 1.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 343 | 381.1 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamina A 18000 U.I.
- Vitamina D3 1800 U.I.
- Vitamina E (α-tocoferol) 120 mg
- Condroitin sulfato 500 mg
- Glucosamina sulfato 500 mg
- MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg
- Hierro 195 mg (como carbonato ferroso)
- Yodo 2,2 mg (como yoduro potásico)
- Cobre 13 mg (como sulfato cúprico pentahidratado)
- Manganeso 44,5 mg (como óxido manganoso)
- Zinc 185 mg (como óxido de zinc)
- Selenio 0,33 mg (como selenito sódico)
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
50/100 · limited — 2 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "+85% de proteína de origen animal (Alto Valor Biológico)" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.
Consistent with the label
- "No incluye trigo, leche o carnes rojas" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
9 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ayuda a las defensas, piel y pelaje (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hipoalergénico y seguro (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| +85% de proteína de origen animal (Alto Valor Biológico) (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| 25% de proteína novedosa, más segura ante respuestas alérgicas. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Libres de colorantes y conservantes de síntesis química (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No incluye trigo, leche o carnes rojas (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutrición de calidad y superior con pescado azul (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Inmune: 500 mg/Kg (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Joints: 5.000 mg/Kg de protectores articulares (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Digestive: 100 mg/Kg (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hipoalergénico natural, esta receta elimina el pollo, cordero y el salmón además de cualquier cereal y los principales alérgenos alimentarios: trigo, lácteos o carnes rojas. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Sensitive
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.