Lenda Pollo para Perros
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Lenda Pollo para Perros a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 58 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list adds +5.7 points, while printing percentages on the label contributes +3.2 points. Conversely, the processing format takes away -7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages deduct -7.9 points from the total.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
60% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe58
- Nutritionalmedium100
- Transparency53
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dried chicken protein, dehydrated turkey protein and plasma protein as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 27%
- Fat
- 16%
- Fibre
- 2.50%
- Ash
- 6.70%
- Calcium
- 1.70%
- Phosphorus
- 1.10%
Energy: 384.8 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg; Vitamina D3 1550 IU/Kg; Vitamina E (acetato de todo-rac-α-Tocoferilo) 110 mg/Kg; Cobre (como sulfato de cobre de (II) pentahidratado (3b 405)) 13 mg/kg; Iodo (como yodato de calcio anhidro (3b202)) 2,2 mg/kg; Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II) (3b101)) 195 mg/kg; Selenio (como selenito de sodio (3b801) 0,33 mg/kg; Manganeso (como óxido manganeso (II) (3b502)) 44,5 mg/kg; Zinc (como óxido de zinc (3b603)) 150 mg/kg
Technological additives
Conservantes; Antioxidantes (Tocoferoles de aceites vegetales)
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated turkey protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists tuna
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dehydrated Chicken 17% | Dried chicken protein | meat | good | 17 | 17.0 |
| 2 | Dehydrated Turkey 12% | Dehydrated turkey protein | meat | good | 12 | 12.0 |
| 3 | Poultry Plasma Protein | Plasma Protein | meat | medium | - | 4.5 |
| 4 | Hydrolysed Chicken | Hydrolysed Chicken | meat | medium | - | 4.5 |
| 5 | Maize | Maize / Corn | carb | poor | - | 4.4 |
| 6 | Chicken Oil 10% | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | 10 | 10.0 |
| 7 | Rice | Rice - white | carb | medium | - | 4.3 |
| 8 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | - | 4.1 |
| 9 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb | poor | - | 4.0 |
| 10 | Dehydrated Tuna 1% | Tuna | meat | good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 11 | Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) | Carob | fibre | medium | - | 3.8 |
| 12 | Brewer's Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of mannan-oligosaccharides MOS) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 3.7 |
| 13 | Salmon Oil (source of Omega 3 fatty acids EPA and DHA) | Salmon Oil | oil | good | - | 3.5 |
| 14 | Brewer's Yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 3.4 |
| 15 | Carob (Ceratonia siliqua) | Carob | fibre | medium | - | 3.3 |
| 16 | Harpagophytum procumbens | Devil's Claw | veg | medium | - | 3.1 |
| 17 | Punica Granatum | Pomegranate | veg | good | - | 3.0 |
| 18 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 2.8 |
| 19 | Dehydrated Tomato and Carrot (sources of lycopene and beta-carotene) | Dehydrated Tomato and Carrot | veg | good | - | 2.7 |
| 20 | Yucca schidigera extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 2.5 |
| 21 | Chicory Root Extract (source of Fructo-oligosaccharides FOS) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre | good | - | 2.4 |
Brand
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 22.0% | 0.116 | +2.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.9% | -0.113 | -1.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.088 | -1.40 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 23.5% | -0.009 | -0.21 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.4% | -0.045 | -0.38 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.868 | -1.74 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.4% | 0.056 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 60.0% | -0.131 | -7.85 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 22.0 | -0.073 | -1.62 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.69 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 22.0% | 0.116 | +2.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.9% | -0.113 | -1.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.8% | -0.088 | -1.40 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.002 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 23.5% | -0.009 | -0.21 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.4% | -0.045 | -0.38 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.868 | -1.74 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.4% | 0.056 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 60.0% | -0.131 | -7.85 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 22.0 | -0.073 | -1.62 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.3
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27 | 29.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.6 |
| Calcium | 1.7 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 384.8 | 418.3 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (40% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| aportan altos niveles de Omega 3 y Omega 6, para favorecer una piel sana y un pelaje brillante (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Aporte de Alimentos Funcionales naturales que ayudan a mantener en estado óptimo articulaciones , músculos y ligamentos (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| incluye Prebióticos que ayudan a la digestión. Y que mejoran el balance de la microbiota intestinal (on pack) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Con 38% de pollo y pavo deshidratados (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| No contiene Trigo, Lácteos, Carnes Rojas, ni Soja (on pack) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lenda
Alternatives to Pollo para Perros
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.