Our verdict
Is Lenda Grain Free Monoproteico Cerdo a good dog food?
We score it 55/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dehydrated pork protein, pork and hydrolysed pork as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
56% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)56% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- unknown 27.0%
- supplement 14.4%
- carb 13.9%
- fibre 13.9%
- meat 13.0%
- veg 11.5%
- oil 6.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | dehydrated pork 27% | Dehydrated Pork Protein | meat · good | 27 | 27.0 |
| 2 | fresh boneless pork 10% | Pork | meat · medium | 10 | 10.0 |
| 3 | pork hydrolysate 3% | Hydrolysed Pork | meat · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 4 | potatoes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 5 | pea protein | Pea protein | carb · medium | - | 4.7 |
| 6 | lentils | Lentils | veg · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 7 | tapioca | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 4.4 |
| 8 | sunflower oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 4.2 |
| 9 | carob flour (Ceratonia siliqua) | Carob Flour | fibre · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 10 | yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS, β-glucans and nucleotides) 2% | Yeast | supplement · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 11 | fish oil (source of Ω3 fatty acids) 2% | Fish Oil | oil · good | 2 | 2.0 |
| 12 | yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.9 |
| 13 | carob (Ceratonia siliqua) | Carob | fibre · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 14 | Harpagophytum procumbens | Devil's Claw | veg · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 15 | Punica granatum | Pomegranate | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 16 | lignocellulose (source of prebiotics XOS) | Lignocellulose | fibre · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 17 | Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera) | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 18 | apple fibre | Apple Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 2.9 |
| 19 | FOS prebiotics 0.05% | Prebiotics | supplement · good | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| 20 | Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement · good | - | 2.8 |
| 21 | Lactobacillus plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
- 1. dehydrated pork 27%27% declared27.0% estimated
- 2. fresh boneless pork 10%10% declared10.0% estimated
- 3. pork hydrolysate 3%3% declared3.0% estimated
- 4. potatoes4.9% estimated
- 5. pea protein4.7% estimated
- 6. lentils4.5% estimated
- 7. tapioca4.4% estimated
- 8. sunflower oil4.2% estimated
- 9. carob flour (Ceratonia siliqua)4.1% estimated
- 10. yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, source of MOS, β-glucans and nucleotides) 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
- 11. fish oil (source of Ω3 fatty acids) 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
- 12. yeast products (Saccharomyces cerevisiae)3.9% estimated
- 13. carob (Ceratonia siliqua)3.7% estimated
- 14. Harpagophytum procumbens3.6% estimated
- 15. Punica granatum3.4% estimated
- 16. lignocellulose (source of prebiotics XOS)3.2% estimated
- 17. Mojave yucca (Yucca schidigera)3.1% estimated
- 18. apple fibre2.9% estimated
- 19. FOS prebiotics 0.05%0.05% declared0.05% estimated
- 20. Enterococcus faecium2.8% estimated
- 21. Lactobacillus plantarum2.6% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 27% · Fat 15%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 27% |
| Fat | 15% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 8% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.53% |
| Calcium | 1.80% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Energy: 372.2 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg; Vitamina D3 1550 IU/Kg; Vitamina E 110 mg/Kg; sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg; sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg; MSM 200 mg/kg; Hierro 195 mg/kg; Iodo 2.2 mg/kg; Cobre 13 mg/kg; Manganeso 44.5 mg/kg; Zinc 185 mg/kg; Selenio 0.33 mg/kg
Technological additives
Conservantes y antioxidantes (extractos de cítricos y tocoferoles)
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Lenda
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score reached 55 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages cost a further -5.9 points. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.1 points, with being labelled nutritionally complete contributing +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.08 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.4% | 0.096 | +0.90 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.25 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.4% | -0.092 | -0.96 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.4% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 22.8% | -0.027 | -0.60 |
| Undeclared quantities | 56.0% | -0.106 | -5.91 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.08 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.4% | 0.096 | +0.90 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.115 | -1.25 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.4% | -0.092 | -0.96 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.9% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.4% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 22.8% | -0.027 | -0.60 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 56.0% | -0.106 | -5.91 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 55.4
- Final score
- 55/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27 | 29.8 (band 18.50718232044199 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.6 (band 5.654972375690608 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.8 | 2 (band 0.5140883977900553 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.4112707182320443 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 372.2 | 411.3 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg
- Vitamina D3 1550 IU/Kg
- Vitamina E 110 mg/Kg
- sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg
- sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg
- MSM 200 mg/kg
- Hierro 195 mg/kg
- Iodo 2.2 mg/kg
- Cobre 13 mg/kg
- Manganeso 44.5 mg/kg
- Zinc 185 mg/kg
- Selenio 0.33 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (44.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 8.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
33/100 · limited — 3 checkable claims: 1 consistent, 2 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "pienso hipoalergénico y monoproteico elaborado exclusivamente con carne de cerdo" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
- "ALTO EN CARNE PARA UNA NUTRICIÓN SUPERIOR: Pienso grain free para perros monoproteico de exclusivamente cerdo, con alto contenido cárnico (77% proteína animal)" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.
Consistent with the label
- "pienso para perros sin cereales" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| pienso para perros sin cereales (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| pienso hipoalergénico y monoproteico elaborado exclusivamente con carne de cerdo (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| ALTO EN CARNE PARA UNA NUTRICIÓN SUPERIOR: Pienso grain free para perros monoproteico de exclusivamente cerdo, con alto contenido cárnico (77% proteína animal) (on page) | High/low level | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Enriquecido con condroprotectores (1800 mg/kg), ayuda a mantener articulaciones fuertes y saludables (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Gracias al Omega 3 (EPA y DHA), aceite de microalgas y krill, este pienso sin cereales mejora la salud cutánea y aporta un pelaje visiblemente más vivo y fuerte (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Con taurina, L-carnitina y minerales quelatados (de mayor absorción), favorece el metabolismo y la vitalidad (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| incorpora prebióticos, probióticos y postbióticos (4 cepas) que favorecen la flora intestinal (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Grain Free Monoproteico Cerdo
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.