Our verdict
Is Lenda Atún Grain Free a good dog food?
We score it 61/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for dogs of all life stages, with tuna protein, potato starch and pea starch as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
69% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken oil and fat
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists tuna protein
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 17.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26% |
| Fat | 17.50% |
| Fibre | 2.80% |
| Ash | 6% |
| Calcium | 1.70% |
| Phosphorus | 0.89% |
Energy: 369 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
18 meses mantenido en el envase original y en condiciones libres de humedad y calor excesivo.
Feeding guide
Las cantidades de alimento a administrar dependen de la actividad, raza y condiciones ambientales. Coloque la comida en un recipiente limpio, en una o dos tomas diarias, respetando un horario establecido y manteniendo en todo momento agua limpia y fresca a disposición.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg; sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg; MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg/kg; Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 195 mg/kg; Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 2,2 mg/kg; Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 13 mg/kg; Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 44,5 mg/kg; Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 185 mg/kg; Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,33 mg/kg; Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg; Vitamina D3 1550 IU/kg; Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 110 mg/kg
Technological additives
Conservantes y antioxidantes (extractos de cítricos y tocoferoles)
Ingredients (25)69% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 34.6%
- veg 22.1%
- supplement 14.3%
- unknown 9.2%
- carb 8.5%
- oil 4.1%
- fibre 3.7%
- additive 3.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuna Protein 27% | Tuna Protein | meat · medium | 27 | 27.0 |
| 2 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 4.3 |
| 3 | Pea Starch | Pea Starch | carb · poor | - | 4.2 |
| 4 | Refined Chicken Oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.1 |
| 5 | Soy Milk Extract | Soya Milk Extract | supplement · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 6 | Peeled Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.9 |
| 7 | Fish Oil Hydrolysed Protein | Fish Oil | oil · good | - | 3.8 |
| 8 | Krill (4%) | Krill | meat · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 9 | Carob | Carob | fibre · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 10 | Egg | Egg | meat · good | - | 3.6 |
| 11 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 3.5 |
| 12 | Chondroitin Sulphate | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 13 | Glucosamine Sulphate | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 3.3 |
| 14 | MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane) | MSM | supplement · good | - | 3.2 |
| 15 | Seaweed Extracts | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 16 | Citrus Extracts (source of natural antioxidants) | Citric Acid | additive · medium | - | 3.0 |
| 17 | 0.01% source of inulin | Inulin | fibre · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 18 | 0.01% F.O.S. fructooligosaccharides | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 19 | Mannanoligosaccharides M | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 2.9 |
| 20 | Melissa officinalis | Lemon Balm | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 21 | Minthostachys verticillata | Minthostachys verticillata | veg · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 22 | Cinnamomum verum | Cinnamon | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 23 | Rosmarinus officinalis | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 2.5 |
| 24 | Gentiana | Dried Gentian Root | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
| 25 | Vaccinium macrocarpon | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 2.3 |
- 1. Tuna Protein 27%27% declared27.0% estimated
- 2. Potato Starch4.3% estimated
- 3. Pea Starch4.2% estimated
- 4. Refined Chicken Oil4.1% estimated
- 5. Soy Milk Extract4.0% estimated
- 6. Peeled Peas3.9% estimated
- 7. Fish Oil Hydrolysed Protein3.8% estimated
- 8. Krill (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 9. Carob3.7% estimated
- 10. Egg3.6% estimated
- 11. Salt3.5% estimated
- 12. Chondroitin Sulphate3.4% estimated
- 13. Glucosamine Sulphate3.3% estimated
- 14. MSM (Methylsulfonylmethane)3.2% estimated
- 15. Seaweed Extracts3.1% estimated
- 16. Citrus Extracts (source of natural antioxidants)3.0% estimated
- 17. 0.01% source of inulin0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 18. 0.01% F.O.S. fructooligosaccharides0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 19. Mannanoligosaccharides M2.9% estimated
- 20. Melissa officinalis2.8% estimated
- 21. Minthostachys verticillata2.7% estimated
- 22. Cinnamomum verum2.6% estimated
- 23. Rosmarinus officinalis2.5% estimated
- 24. Gentiana2.4% estimated
- 25. Vaccinium macrocarpon2.3% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Lenda
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 61 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares, meaning ingredients without printed percentages, contributed -7.3 points against the score. Overall ingredient quality, referring to the overall quality of the ingredient list, contributed +3.9 points. Complete recipe, being labelled nutritionally complete, contributed +2.3 points, and printed percentages, meaning printing percentages for most of the recipe, contributed +2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.94 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 17.7% | 0.096 | +1.70 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.115 | -1.13 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.092 | -0.77 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.012 | -0.25 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.027 | -0.25 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.0% | -0.065 | -0.78 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 69.0% | -0.106 | -7.28 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Additive penalty | -4.26 | 0.222 | -0.95 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.94 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 17.7% | 0.096 | +1.70 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.8% | -0.115 | -1.13 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.3% | -0.092 | -0.77 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.4% | 0.163 | +1.05 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.012 | -0.25 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 9.5% | -0.027 | -0.25 |
| Recipe graded poor | 12.0% | -0.065 | -0.78 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.3% | 0.060 | +0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 69.0% | -0.106 | -7.28 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -4.26 | 0.222 | -0.95 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 61.1
- Final score
- 61/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26 | 118.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 17.5 | 79.5 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.8 | 12.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 40.9 |
| Calcium | 1.7 | 7.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 0 |
| Phosphorus | 0.89 | 4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 0 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.9 | 1.9 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 369 | 1677.3 | 100 |
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 78% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- sulfato de condroitina 500 mg/kg
- sulfato de glucosamina 500 mg/kg
- MSM (Metilsulfonilmetano) 200 mg/kg
- Hierro (como carbonato de hierro (II)) 195 mg/kg
- Iodo (como Ioduro potásico) 2,2 mg/kg
- Cobre (como sulfato de cobre (II) pentahidratado) 13 mg/kg
- Manganeso (como óxido manganoso) 44,5 mg/kg
- Zinc (como óxido de zinc) 185 mg/kg
- Selenio (como selenito sódico) 0,33 mg/kg
- Vitamina A 16000 IU/kg
- Vitamina D3 1550 IU/kg
- Vitamina E (α-Tocoferol) 110 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (31% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 6.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "sin trigo, leche o carnes rojas" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
11 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ayuda a las defensas, piel y pelaje (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hipoalergénico y seguro (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Croquetas diseñadas para los más pequeños (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Inmune: 500 mg/Kg (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Digestive: 100 mg/Kg (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 26% de proteínas (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hipoalergénico: atún y krill, cocinado sin cereales (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| FAEC Joints: 5.000 mg/Kg de protectores articulares (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| libres de colorantes y conservantes de síntesis química (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| sin trigo, leche o carnes rojas (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 76% Proteína de origen animal (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nutrición de calidad y superior con pescado azul (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Atún Grain Free
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.