K9 Optimum Senior Dog Food Chicken
Wet Pate complete Clear label
Is K9 Optimum Senior Dog Food Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 72/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This food achieves an overall score of 72 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +3.4 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.1. Furthermore, printing percentages on the label contributed +3.2 to the score. However, ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -6.3 points.
48% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe72
- Nutritionalmedium84
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete wet paté food for senior dogs, with chicken, vitamins and minerals and potato starch as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Doesn't list grain ingredients.
- High in protein: 40% protein on a dry-matter basis.
Why you might not
- High in fat: 30% fat on a dry-matter basis.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 8%
- Fat
- 6%
- Fibre
- 0.10%
- Ash
- 3.20%
- Moisture
- 80%
- Calcium
- 0.60%
- Phosphorus
- 0.50%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 1500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 250 IU/kg; Vitamin E 40 mg/kg; L-Carnitine 25 mg/kg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate, Monohydrate) 20 mg/kg; Iron (Iron Sulphate, Monohydrate) 15 mg/kg; Manganese (Manganous Sulphate, Monohydrate) 5 mg/kg; Copper (Copper Sulphate, Pentahydrate) 1.2 mg/kg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate, Anhydrous) 0.5 mg/kg
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids turkey: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 30.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (12)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken (50%) | Chicken | meat | medium | 50 | 50.0 |
| 2 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 19.2 |
| 3 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb | poor | - | 16.0 |
| 4 | Poultry Plasma (0.7%) | Plasma Protein | meat | medium | 0.7 | 0.7 |
| 5 | Dried Carrot (0.47%) | Carrots | veg | good | 0.47 | 0.5 |
| 6 | Dried Potato (0.47%) | Potatoes | carb | medium | 0.47 | 0.5 |
| 7 | Flaxseed Oil (0.1%) | Linseed oil | oil | good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 8 | Salmon Oil (0.1%) | Salmon Oil | oil | good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 9 | Dried Seaweed (0.04%) | Seaweed | veg | good | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 10 | Chicory Root Powder (0.03%) | Chicory root | veg | good | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 11 | Glucosamine HCl (0.01%) | Glucosamine | supplement | good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 12 | Chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement | good | - | 12.8 |
Brand
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-13
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.jollyes.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +6.06 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 29.1% | 0.116 | +3.37 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.1% | -0.113 | -1.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.088 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 60.4% | -0.009 | -0.54 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.0% | -0.045 | -0.72 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.0% | 0.056 | +0.90 |
| Undeclared quantities | 48.1% | -0.131 | -6.29 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 29.1 | -0.073 | -2.13 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +6.06 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 29.1% | 0.116 | +3.37 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 9.1% | -0.113 | -1.02 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.088 | -0.04 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.0% | -0.002 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 60.4% | -0.009 | -0.54 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.0% | -0.045 | -0.72 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 16.0% | 0.056 | +0.90 |
| Undeclared quantities | 48.1% | -0.131 | -6.29 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 29.1 | -0.073 | -2.13 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.996 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | 2.935 | +2.94 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.16
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 72.1
- Final score
- 72/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 72/100 | current |
| v1 | 70/100 | |
| v1.9 | 72/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8 | 40 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6 | 30 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.1 | 0.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 70 |
| Calcium | 0.6 | 3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 80 |
| Phosphorus | 0.5 | 2.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 43.8 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (51.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 10.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoallergenic (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy Skin & Coat (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy Immune System (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy Joints (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Healthy Weight (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| 29% steam cooked fresh ingredients for better digestion (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| No Artificial Flavours or Colours (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains Omega-3 and 6 essential acids for a healthy coat (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Free from added colours, flavours, and preservatives (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Veterinary Approved Complete Pet Food (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from K9 Optimum
Alternatives to Senior Dog Food Chicken
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.