Just Be Kind Green Crunch

Dry Cold Pressed · completeClear label

Green Crunch
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Just Be Kind Green Crunch a good dog food?

We score it 53/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete cold-pressed dry food for adult dogs, with sweet potatoes, pea protein and lentils as the main ingredients.

How we score

32% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • Low in fat for its format: 8% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 23% · Fat 7.50%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein23%
Fat7.50%
Fibre3.30%
Ash6.30%
Moisture8%
Calcium0.80%
Phosphorus0.40%

Energy: 348 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

5 kg: 75 - 115 g, 10 kg: 120 - 190 g, 20 kg: 200 - 310 g, 30 kg: 290 - 430 g, 40 kg: 410 - 500 g, 50 kg: 350 - 550 g, 60 kg: 420 - 650 g daily quantity for adult dogs from 12 months.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A (3a672a) 17500 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 (3a671) 1610 IU/kg; Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) (3a671) 63 µg/kg; Taurine (3a370) 874 mg/kg; DL-Methionine (3c301) 6.3 g/kg; L-Carnitine (3a910) 220 mg/kg; iron as iron (II) glycine chelate hydrate (3b108) 2.3 mg/kg; copper (II) glycine chelate hydrate (solid) (3b413) 1.8 mg/kg; zinc as zinc oxide (3b603) 59 mg/kg; iodine as calcium iodate anhydrous (3b202) 1.3 mg/kg

Ingredients (13)32% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 53.0%
  • veg 25.4%
  • oil 9.2%
  • supplement 8.6%
  • fibre 3.8%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
135% sweet potatoSweet Potatoescarb · good3535.0
218% pea proteinPea proteincarb · medium1818.0
315% lentilsLentilsveg · medium1515.0
4mineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-5.1
5rapeseed oilRapeseed oiloil · good-4.8
6sunflower oilSunflower oiloil · good-4.5
7linseedLinseedveg · good-4.1
8carobCarobfibre · medium-3.8
9brewer's yeastBrewer's Yeastsupplement · good-3.5
10carrotCarrotsveg · good-3.2
110.1% blueberriesBlueberriesveg · good0.10.1
12pumpkinPumpkinveg · good-2.9
130.1% algaeSeaweedveg · good0.10.1
  1. 1. 35% sweet potato35% declared35.0% estimated
    Sweet Potatoes · carb · good
  2. 2. 18% pea protein18% declared18.0% estimated
    Pea protein · carb · medium
  3. 3. 15% lentils15% declared15.0% estimated
    Lentils · veg · medium
  4. 4. minerals5.1% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  5. 5. rapeseed oil4.8% estimated
    Rapeseed oil · oil · good
  6. 6. sunflower oil4.5% estimated
    Sunflower oil · oil · good
  7. 7. linseed4.1% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  8. 8. carob3.8% estimated
    Carob · fibre · medium
  9. 9. brewer's yeast3.5% estimated
    Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
  10. 10. carrot3.2% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  11. 11. 0.1% blueberries0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Blueberries · veg · good
  12. 12. pumpkin2.9% estimated
    Pumpkin · veg · good
  13. 13. 0.1% algae0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Seaweed · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-02

Brand and contact: Just Be Kind

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-02
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
justbekind.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.7/5 · 1 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The food scores 53 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +7 points. The processing format deducted -6.7 points. The carbohydrate content deducted -5.4 points, and ingredients without printed percentages deducted -3.4 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+6.96
Carb share of dry matter47.3%-0.115-5.44
Oil share of dry matter17.5%-0.092-1.61
Vegetable share of dry matter13.4%-0.005-0.07
Supplement share of dry matter15.2%-0.012-0.19
Undeclared quantities31.8%-0.106-3.36
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+6.96
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter47.3%-0.115-5.44
Oil share of dry matter17.5%-0.092-1.61
Vegetable share of dry matter13.4%-0.005-0.07
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter15.2%-0.012-0.19
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities31.8%-0.106-3.36
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatyes-1.180-1.18
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
53.2
Final score
53/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v353/100current
v268/100
v167/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2325 (band 18 to 40%)89.1
Fat7.58.2 (band 5.5 to 20%)81
Fibre3.33.6 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium0.80.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)81.1
Phosphorus0.40.4 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)71.7
Calcium:phosphorus ratio22 (band 1 to 2%)100
Energy (kcal/100g)348378.3100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A (3a672a) 17500 IU/kg
  • Vitamin D3 (3a671) 1610 IU/kg
  • Vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin) (3a671) 63 µg/kg
  • Taurine (3a370) 874 mg/kg
  • DL-Methionine (3c301) 6.3 g/kg
  • L-Carnitine (3a910) 220 mg/kg
  • iron as iron (II) glycine chelate hydrate (3b108) 2.3 mg/kg
  • copper (II) glycine chelate hydrate (solid) (3b413) 1.8 mg/kg
  • zinc as zinc oxide (3b603) 59 mg/kg
  • iodine as calcium iodate anhydrous (3b202) 1.3 mg/kg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (68.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)13.6/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · strong — 4 checkable claims: 4 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "NO RICE" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "excludes rice, offering a hypoallergenic alternative for dogs with grain intolerances" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "NO GRAINS" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "NO ANIMAL OR FISH PROTEINS" — supported by the declared fish data.

7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
hypoallergenic (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
CRUELTY-FREE (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
NO ADDITIVES (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
soya and grain free (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
NO RICE (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
excludes rice, offering a hypoallergenic alternative for dogs with grain intolerances (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
PLANT-BASED (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
NO CORN (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
NO SOYA (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
NO GRAINS (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
NO ANIMAL OR FISH PROTEINS (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Green Crunch

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Just Be Kind

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.