Husse Tasty pâté with beef for dogs
Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Husse Tasty pâté with beef for dogs a good dog food?
We score it 46/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with meat and animal derivatives, beef and vegetable by as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids beef: the label lists beef
- You are limiting fat: 39.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 9% · Fat 7.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 9% |
| Fat | 7.50% |
| Fibre | 0.50% |
| Ash | 1% |
| Moisture | 81% |
Energy: 107 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool, dry place away from direct sunlight. Once opened, store in the refrigerator and use within 2 days.
Feeding guide
For daily ration, see feeding table on packaging. Divide the daily ration into 2-3 meals.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
vitamin A (3a672a) 2500 IU/kg; vitamin D3 250 IU/kg; vitamin E (3a700i) 5 mg/kg
Ingredients (6)19% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 80.0%
- other 10.9%
- supplement 8.6%
- veg 0.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 66% meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | 66 | 66.0 |
| 2 | beef 14% | Beef | meat · medium | 14 | 14.0 |
| 3 | derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 10.9 |
| 4 | dried ginseng 0.5% | Ginseng | supplement · medium | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 5 | dried pineapple 0.5% | Pineapple | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 6 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 8.1 |
- 1. 66% meat and animal derivatives66% declared66.0% estimated
- 2. beef 14%14% declared14.0% estimated
- 3. derivatives of vegetable origin10.9% estimated
- 4. dried ginseng 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 5. dried pineapple 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 6. minerals8.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Husse
- Website
- https://www.husse.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 020 7998 3439
- Address
- Unit 1, 180 Park Ave London NW10 7XH
- Contact page
- www.husse.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.husse.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product earned a score of 46 out of 100. Lower-quality meat ingredients reduced the score by -11.8 points. The meat content added +5.9 points, while the remaining ingredients brought it back down by -5.6 points. Finally, lower-quality ingredients further reduced the score by -5 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.5 | 9.191 | -4.48 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 61.8% | 0.096 | +5.94 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.375 | -5.61 |
| Recipe graded poor | 76.9% | -0.065 | -4.99 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 66.0% | -0.179 | -11.79 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 66.0% | 0.060 | +3.96 |
| Undeclared quantities | 19.0% | -0.106 | -2.01 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -5.28 | 0.222 | -1.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.5 | 9.191 | -4.48 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 61.8% | 0.096 | +5.94 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 21.9% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.375 | -5.61 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 76.9% | -0.065 | -4.99 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 66.0% | -0.179 | -11.79 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 66.0% | 0.060 | +3.96 |
| Undeclared quantities | 19.0% | -0.106 | -2.01 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.28 | 0.222 | -1.17 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 45.8
- Final score
- 46/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 9 | 47.4 (band 25.3421052631579 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 7.5 | 39.5 (band 7.7434210526315805 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.5 | 2.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 98.4 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 107 | 563.2 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- vitamin A (3a672a) 2500 IU/kg
- vitamin D3 250 IU/kg
- vitamin E (3a700i) 5 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (81% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| rich in beef (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| No added artificial flavours, colourants and preservatives (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Enriched with ginseng, source of natural antioxidants (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Tasty pâté with beef for dogs
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.