Hunters Natural Field Supreme Keepers Mix

Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Field Supreme Keepers Mix
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Hunters Natural Field Supreme Keepers Mix a good dog food?

We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with duck, poultry fat and potatoes as the main ingredients.

How we score

26% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 40% of the dry matter (29% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 26% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein26%
Fat11%
Fibre4%
Ash8%
Moisture8%
Carbohydrates43%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.50%
Omega-6 fatty acids2.60%
Calcium1.90%
Phosphorus1.20%

Energy: 350 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

1-5KG | 35-115g per day; 5-10KG | 115-190g per day; 10-20KG | 190-320g per day; 20-30KG | 320-435g per day; 30KG+ | 435g+ per day

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 14,400 IU; Vitamin D3 1,925 IU; Biotin 145 mcg; Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 50 mg; Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 35 mg; Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 12 mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1 mg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.19 mg

Ingredients (8)26% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 31.0%
  • meat 29.0%
  • veg 17.3%
  • supplement 8.7%
  • oil 7.0%
  • fibre 7.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Dried Duck 27%Duckmeat · medium2727.0
2Duck Fat 7%Poultry Fatoil · medium77.0
3Duck Gravy 2%Duckmeat · medium22.0
4Potato (31%)Potatoescarb · medium3131.0
5PeasPeasveg · good-10.4
6Beet Pulp (7%)Beet Pulpfibre · medium77.0
7Brewer's YeastBrewer's Yeastsupplement · good-8.7
8LinseedLinseedveg · good-6.9
  1. 1. Dried Duck 27%27% declared27.0% estimated
    Duck · meat · medium
  2. 2. Duck Fat 7%7% declared7.0% estimated
    Poultry Fat · oil · medium
  3. 3. Duck Gravy 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
    Duck · meat · medium
  4. 4. Potato (31%)31% declared31.0% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  5. 5. Peas10.4% estimated
    Peas · veg · good
  6. 6. Beet Pulp (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  7. 7. Brewer's Yeast8.7% estimated
    Brewer's Yeast · supplement · good
  8. 8. Linseed6.9% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: Hunters Natural
Hunters Natural logo
Phone
01926 520 037
Address
Hunters Natural, 102 Queslett Road East, Sutton Coldfield, Birmingham, West Midlands, B74 2EZ

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Facebook: - · 1 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 66 out of 100. The meat content contributed +3.9, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8. On the other hand, the processing format adjusted the score by -6.7. Finally, ingredients without printed percentages contributed -2.7 to the final calculation.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.77
Meat share of dry matter40.5%0.096+3.89
Carb share of dry matter12.5%-0.115-1.44
Oil share of dry matter11.2%-0.092-1.03
Vegetable share of dry matter12.6%-0.005-0.07
Supplement share of dry matter12.9%-0.012-0.16
Undeclared quantities26.0%-0.106-2.75
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.77
Meat share of dry matter40.5%0.096+3.89
Carb share of dry matter12.5%-0.115-1.44
Oil share of dry matter11.2%-0.092-1.03
Vegetable share of dry matter12.6%-0.005-0.07
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter12.9%-0.012-0.16
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities26.0%-0.106-2.75
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
65.5
Final score
66/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v366/100current
v265/100
v165/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2628.3 (band 18 to 40%)98
Fat1112 (band 5.5 to 20%)96.7
Fibre44.3 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.92.1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus1.21.3 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.61.6 (band 1 to 2%)100
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)350380.4100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 14,400 IU
  • Vitamin D3 1,925 IU
  • Biotin 145 mcg
  • Iron (Iron (II) Sulphate Monohydrate) 50 mg
  • Zinc (Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate) 35 mg
  • Copper (Copper (II) Sulphate Pentahydrate) 12 mg
  • Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1 mg
  • Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.19 mg

High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (74% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)14.8/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)10/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Veterinarian Approved (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
SUPPORTS WORKING PERFORMANCE & POST WORK REPLENISHMENT (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
HELPS PROTECT JOINTS & ARTICULAR CARTILAGE RENEWAL (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
SUPPORTS THE DEVELOPMENT & MAINTENANCE OF LEAN MUSCLE (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
AIDS NORMAL & HEALTHY GASTROINTESTINAL FUNCTIONING (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
HELPS MAINTAIN DERMATOLOGICAL HEALTH & A SHINY COAT (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
SUPPORTS HEALTHY VISUAL DEVELOPMENT & PROCESSING (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
AIDS HEALTHY COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING & PROCESSING (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
SUPPORTS NORMAL & PROTECTIVE IMMUNOLOGICAL FUNCTIONING (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Nutritious Vegetables & Botanicals (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Naturally hypoallergenic (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No Added Grain, 36% British Duck (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Free From Artificial Colours & Preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Field Supreme Keepers Mix

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Hunters Natural

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.