mera Lamm & Reis Trockenfutter

Dry Extruded complete Clear label

Lamm & Reis Trockenfutter
Average
our rating

Is mera Lamm & Reis Trockenfutter a good dog food?

We score it 49/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 49 out of 100. The score is influenced by several elements, beginning with the carbohydrate content which contributes -7.3 to the total. Additionally, the processing format accounts for -7, while ingredients without printed percentages add -4.9. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list lifts the result by +4.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

37% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with rice, dried lamb protein and rice protein as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.

View the source page

Estimated composition

carb60.8%
supplement11.7%
unknown10.0%
other5.9%
additive4.6%
fibre3.1%
veg2.5%
oil1.5%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
22%
Fat
12%
Fibre
2.50%
Ash
8.50%
Omega-3 fatty acids
0.81%
Omega-6 fatty acids
2%
Calcium
1.70%
Phosphorus
1%
Sodium
0.40%

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 12.000 IE/kg; Vitamin D3 1.500 IE/kg; Vitamin E 300 mg/kg; Vitamin C 200 mg/kg; Taurin 1.000 mg/kg; Kupfer (als Kupfer-(II)-sulfat, Pentahydrat) 12,5 mg/kg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 100 mg/kg; Zink (als Glycin-Zinkchelat-Hydrat (fest)) 40 mg/kg; Eisen (als Eisen-(II)-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 250 mg/kg; Mangan (als Mangan-(II)-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 35 mg/kg; Jod (als Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 2,3 mg/kg; Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,35 mg/kg

Technological additives

Antioxidationsmittel

Storage

Bitte alle mera Produkte kühl und trocken lagern, damit die Qualität unserer Produkte über den gesamten Haltbarkeitszeitraum gewährleistet ist.

Feeding guide

Im Allgemeinen trocken füttern; ständig frisches Wasser zur Verfügung stellen. Richtwerte g/Tag: 10 kg → 150 g, 15 kg → 200 g, 20 kg → 250 g, 30 kg → 340 g, 40 kg → 420 g, 50 kg → 495 g, 60 kg → 565 g, 70 kg → 635 g. Je nach äußeren Einflüssen und Anlagen des Hundes anpassen.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 3.6/5 · 9 reviews

58 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists dried lamb protein
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (16)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Rice (53%)Rice - whitecarbmedium5353.0
2Lamb proteinDried Lamb Proteinmeatgood-5.3
3driedunmatched---5.0
4Rice proteinRice Proteincarbmedium-4.7
5Lamb fatSheep fatoilmedium-4.4
6Beet pulp (3%)Beet Pulpfibremedium33.0
7Brewer's yeastBrewer's Yeastsupplementgood-4.1
8driedunmatched---3.8
9Protein hydrolysate (from yeast)Protein Hydrolysateotherpoor-3.5
10Apple pomace (2.8%)Apple Fibrefibremedium2.82.8
11Linseed (2.5%)Linseedveggood2.52.5
12Sunflower oil (1%)Sunflower oiloilgood11.0
13Potassium chloridePotassium Chloridesupplementmedium-3.2
14Salmon oil (0.5%)Salmon Oiloilgood0.50.5
15Sodium chlorideSaltadditivepoor-2.9
16Chicory inulin (0.1%)Inulinfibregood0.10.1

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-02
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.49.915+3.98
Carb share of dry matter64.6%-0.113-7.27
Oil share of dry matter1.8%-0.088-0.16
Additive share of dry matter5.0%0.177+0.88
Supplement share of dry matter13.0%-0.009-0.12
Other share of dry matter3.5%-0.371-1.31
Unrecognised share of dry matter6.0%-0.022-0.13
Recipe graded poor10.4%-0.045-0.47
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient5.9%0.056+0.33
Undeclared quantities37.1%-0.131-4.86
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Additive penalty-5.560.236-1.31
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.49.915+3.98
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.116+0.00
Carb share of dry matter64.6%-0.113-7.27
Oil share of dry matter1.8%-0.088-0.16
Vegetable share of dry matter2.7%-0.002-0.00
Additive share of dry matter5.0%0.177+0.88
Supplement share of dry matter13.0%-0.009-0.12
Other share of dry matter3.5%-0.371-1.31
Unrecognised share of dry matter6.0%-0.022-0.13
Recipe graded poor10.4%-0.045-0.47
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient5.9%0.056+0.33
Undeclared quantities37.1%-0.131-4.86
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Meat share × printed percentages0.0-0.073+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty-5.560.236-1.31
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.01
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
49.1
Final score
49/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v249/100current
v148/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2223.9 (band 18 to 40%)86.1
Fat1213 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre2.52.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)99.6
Calcium1.71.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)100
Phosphorus11.1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.71.7 (band 1 to 2%)100
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (62.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)12.6/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from mera

Alternatives to Lamm & Reis Trockenfutter

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.