mera gastro intestinal

Dry Extruded complete Clear label

gastro intestinal
Average
our rating

Is mera gastro intestinal a good dog food?

We score it 52/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves a total score of 52 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.3 points to the score. However, the processing format reduced the score by -7. Furthermore, ingredients without printed percentages subtracted -6.5, and the carbohydrate content contributed -5.7 to the calculation.

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

50% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with dehydrated poultry proteins, hydrolysed poultry protein and rice as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • Meat makes up an estimated 5% of the dry matter (7% as fed); carbohydrates dominate.

View the source page

Estimated composition

carb47.5%
unknown13.2%
supplement11.9%
oil8.8%
meat6.9%
fibre5.9%
veg3.0%
additive2.7%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
25%
Fat
12%
Fibre
2.50%
Ash
7.80%
Calcium
1.15%
Phosphorus
0.90%
Sodium
0.60%

Energy: 366 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 18.000 IE; Vitamin D3 1.600 IE; Vitamin E (all rac-alpha-Tocopherylacetat) 400 mg; Vitamin C (Na-Ca-Ascorbylphosphat) 200 mg; Kupfer (als Kupfer(II)-Sulfat, Pentahydrat) 12,5 mg; Zink (als Zinksulfat, Monohydrat) 100 mg; Zink (als Glycin-Zinkchelat, Hydrat) 120 mg; Eisen (als Eisen-(II)-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 150 mg; Mangan (als Mangan-(II)-Sulfat, Monohydrat) 25 mg; Jod (als Calciumjodat, wasserfrei) 1,8 mg; Selen (als Natriumselenit) 0,35 mg

Technological additives

Antioxidationsmittel

Storage

Bitte alle mera Produkte kühl und trocken lagern, damit die Qualität unserer Produkte über den gesamten Haltbarkeitszeitraum gewährleistet ist.

Feeding guide

Gewicht kg / g/Tag: 1/35, 3/80, 5/120, 10/200, 15/270, 20/335, 30/455, 40/565, 50/670, 60/765, 70/860, 80/950. Bei akutem Durchfall 1-2 Wochen, bei unzureichender Verdauung 3-12 Wochen, chronische Bauchspeicheldrüseninsuffizienz ggf. lebenslang. Vor Verwendung Tierarzt empfohlen. Kann angefeuchtet oder mit vital gastro intestinal Nassfutter kombiniert werden (jeweils Hälfte der Menge); Wasser nicht heißer als 50°C, vor Fütterung auf 35°C abkühlen.

Reviews

Trustpilot: 3.6/5 · 9 reviews

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (28)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1Poultry proteinDehydrated Poultry Proteinsmeatgood-3.3
2partly dried and hydrolysedHydrolysed Poultry Proteinmeatmedium-3.2
3Rice (25 %)Rice - whitecarbmedium2525.0
4Rice flour (22.5 %)Rice flourcarbmedium22.522.5
5Poultry fatPoultry Fatoilmedium-3.1
6Chicken liverChicken Livermeatgood-3.0
7driedunmatched---2.9
8Dried beet pulpBeet Pulpfibremedium-2.9
9LignocelluloseLignocellulosefibremedium-2.8
10Egg powderDried Whole Eggmeatgood-2.7
11LinseedLinseedveggood-2.6
12Salmon oilSalmon Oiloilgood-2.6
13Brewer's yeastBrewer's Yeastsupplementgood-2.5
14Sodium chlorideSaltadditivepoor-2.4
15Potassium chloridePotassium Chloridesupplementmedium-2.3
16Sunflower oilSunflower oiloilgood-2.2
17Monocalcium phosphateMonocalcium phosphatesupplementgood-2.2
18Yeast cell wallsYeastsupplementgood-2.1
19equivalent to 0.063 % mannan-oligosaccharidesMannanoligosaccharidessupplementgood-2.0
200.057 % beta-glucansBeta-Glucanssupplementgood0.0570.06
21Chicory inulin (0.1 %)Inulinfibregood0.10.1
22Psyllium husk (0.1 %)Psyllium fibrefibregood0.10.1
23Sodium butyrate (0.1 %)Sodium Butyratesupplementgood0.10.1
240.1 % seaweed mealSeaweed Mealsupplementmedium0.10.1
25Grape seed flourGrape Seed Expellerothermedium-1.9
26Hop flourWheatcarbpoor-1.9
27Green tea (rich in flavonoids and polyphenols)Green Teaveggood-1.8
28Marigold meal (rich in lutein)Calendulaveggood-1.7

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-02
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.59.915+5.25
Meat share of dry matter5.1%0.116+0.59
Carb share of dry matter50.7%-0.113-5.71
Oil share of dry matter10.5%-0.088-0.93
Vegetable share of dry matter3.3%-0.002-0.01
Additive share of dry matter2.9%0.177+0.52
Supplement share of dry matter13.2%-0.009-0.12
Unrecognised share of dry matter7.9%-0.022-0.18
Recipe graded poor2.7%-0.045-0.12
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Largest single poor ingredient2.7%0.056+0.15
Undeclared quantities49.7%-0.131-6.51
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Meat share × printed percentages5.1-0.073-0.37
Additive penalty-3.310.236-0.78
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.59.915+5.25
Meat share of dry matter5.1%0.116+0.59
Carb share of dry matter50.7%-0.113-5.71
Oil share of dry matter10.5%-0.088-0.93
Vegetable share of dry matter3.3%-0.002-0.01
Additive share of dry matter2.9%0.177+0.52
Supplement share of dry matter13.2%-0.009-0.12
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.371+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter7.9%-0.022-0.18
Recipe graded poor2.7%-0.045-0.12
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients1-0.868-0.87
Largest single poor ingredient2.7%0.056+0.15
Undeclared quantities49.7%-0.131-6.51
Prints ingredient percentagesyes3.194+3.19
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatyes-1.250-1.25
Meat share × printed percentages5.1-0.073-0.37
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty-3.310.236-0.78
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.996-7.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.711+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.01
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
52.3
Final score
52/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v252/100current
v158/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2527.2 (band 18 to 40%)95
Fat1213 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre2.52.7 (band 0.5 to 5%)99.6
Calcium1.151.2 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)92.5
Phosphorus0.91 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)98.9
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)86.7
Energy (kcal/100g)366397.8100

Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (50.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)10.1/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from mera

Alternatives to gastro intestinal

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.