Our verdict
Is Hoddy's Wild British Game a good dog food?
We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with pheasant, duck and meat meal as the main ingredients.
49% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken broth
- Your dog avoids venison: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 18%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 28% |
| Fat | 18% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 8% |
| Moisture | 9% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.80% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.60% |
| Calcium | 1.50% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool and dry place and ensure the pack is properly closed after opening.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 20000 IU; Vitamin D3 1500 IU; Vitamin E 150 mg
Ingredients (18)49% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 53.7%
- veg 16.5%
- carb 11.3%
- supplement 8.1%
- fibre 5.5%
- oil 5.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | pheasant 26% | Pheasant | meat · good | 26 | 26.0 |
| 2 | dried duck 19% | Duck | meat · medium | 19 | 19.0 |
| 3 | dried venison 4% | Meat Meal | meat · medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 4 | sweet potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | - | 4.9 |
| 5 | potato flakes | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 4.7 |
| 6 | peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 4.5 |
| 7 | chicken fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.3 |
| 8 | chicken stock | Chicken Broth | meat · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 9 | dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 10 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 11 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 12 | yeast hydrolysate | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.4 |
| 13 | MOS and beta glucans 1% | Beta-Glucans | supplement · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 14 | dried chicory | Chicory | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
| 15 | FOS and inulin 1% | Inulin | fibre · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 16 | dried carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
| 17 | dried kelp | Kelp | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 18 | Yucca schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 2.6 |
- 1. pheasant 26%26% declared26.0% estimated
- 2. dried duck 19%19% declared19.0% estimated
- 3. dried venison 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
- 4. sweet potato4.9% estimated
- 5. potato flakes4.7% estimated
- 6. peas4.5% estimated
- 7. chicken fat4.3% estimated
- 8. chicken stock4.1% estimated
- 9. dried beet pulp4.0% estimated
- 10. linseed3.8% estimated
- 11. minerals3.6% estimated
- 12. yeast hydrolysate3.4% estimated
- 13. MOS and beta glucans 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 14. dried chicory3.2% estimated
- 15. FOS and inulin 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 16. dried carrots3.0% estimated
- 17. dried kelp2.8% estimated
- 18. Yucca schidigera2.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Hoddy's
- Website
- https://hoddys.co.uk/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- hoddys.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 66 out of 100 based on several key factors. The meat content contributed +4.6 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.6 points. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 points, and ingredients without printed percentages resulted in a deduction of -5.2 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.5% | 0.096 | +4.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.115 | -0.54 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.092 | -0.76 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 49.0% | -0.106 | -5.17 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 47.5% | 0.096 | +4.56 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 4.7% | -0.115 | -0.54 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.2% | -0.092 | -0.76 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.3% | -0.005 | -0.09 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 49.0% | -0.106 | -5.17 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 65.8
- Final score
- 66/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.8 | 100 |
| Fat | 18 | 19.8 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.5 | 1.6 | 97 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100, omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 3 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 20000 IU
- Vitamin D3 1500 IU
- Vitamin E 150 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (51% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 10.2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Made in the UK" — supported by the declared made in the UK data.
- "Grain free" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
4 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made in the UK (on page) | provenance | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hypoallergenic (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Linseed oil for joint & skin health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Prebiotics for gut health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All natural ingredients (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Grain free (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Wild British Game
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.