Hill's Sensitive Stomach & Skin Small & Mini Adult Dog Food with Chicken
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Hill's Sensitive Stomach & Skin Small & Mini Adult Dog Food with Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 42/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dehydrated chicken and turkey, poultry and rice as the main ingredients.
74% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated chicken and turkey
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated chicken and turkey
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 22.50% · Fat 14.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 22.50% |
| Fat | 14.20% |
| Fibre | 1.70% |
| Ash | 5% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Carbohydrates | 48.60% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.58% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 3.60% |
| Calcium | 0.80% |
| Phosphorus | 0.68% |
| Sodium | 0.26% |
Energy: 370 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
To prevent suffocation, keep the packaging out of the reach of pets and children.
Feeding guide
Feed the daily amount shown; adjust to maintain optimum weight. Mix increasing amounts of new food with decreasing amounts of old food over a 7-day period when transitioning. Keep fresh water available at all times.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
3b103 (Iron) 76.4mg; 3b202 (Iodine) 1.9mg; 3b405 (Copper) 7.5mg; 3b502 (Manganese) 7.9mg; 3b603 (Zinc) 134mg; 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2mg; Vitamin A 7,766 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 655 IU/kg; Vitamin E 842mg/kg; Vitamin C 143mg/kg; Beta-carotene 2.0mg/kg
Technological additives
Natural antioxidant
Ingredients (15)74% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 40.4%
- carb 38.2%
- oil 10.2%
- veg 4.5%
- supplement 4.2%
- fibre 2.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken and turkey meal | Dehydrated Chicken and Turkey | meat · medium | - | 8.3 |
| 2 | total poultry 15% | Poultry | meat · medium | 15 | 15.0 |
| 3 | broken rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.9 |
| 4 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 7.6 |
| 5 | brown rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 7.3 |
| 6 | maize protein meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 7.0 |
| 7 | barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 8 | oats | Oats | carb · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 9 | animal fat | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 6.0 |
| 10 | digest | Digest | meat · poor | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | vegetable oil | Vegetable oil | oil · medium | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | dried beet pulp (2.5%) | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 13 | flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.1 |
| 14 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | dried eggs. | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 4.4 |
- 1. Chicken and turkey meal8.3% estimated
- 2. total poultry 15%15% declared15.0% estimated
- 3. broken rice7.9% estimated
- 4. maize7.6% estimated
- 5. brown rice7.3% estimated
- 6. maize protein meal7.0% estimated
- 7. barley6.7% estimated
- 8. oats6.3% estimated
- 9. animal fat6.0% estimated
- 10. digest5.7% estimated
- 11. vegetable oil5.4% estimated
- 12. dried beet pulp (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 13. flaxseed5.1% estimated
- 14. minerals4.8% estimated
- 15. dried eggs.4.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Hill's
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.co.uk/
- Address
- Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 42 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +2.5 points to the total. However, the presence of ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -7.8. Furthermore, the processing format decreased the score by -6.7, and the carbohydrate content lowered the final result by -5.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.51 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.096 | +0.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.5% | -0.115 | -5.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.9% | -0.092 | -1.28 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.7% | -0.065 | -1.08 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.1% | -0.179 | -0.91 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 73.5% | -0.106 | -7.76 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -0.26 | 0.222 | -0.06 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.51 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 9.3% | 0.096 | +0.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.5% | -0.115 | -5.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 13.9% | -0.092 | -1.28 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.7% | -0.065 | -1.08 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 5.1% | -0.179 | -0.91 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 3 | -0.876 | -2.63 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.2% | 0.060 | +0.37 |
| Undeclared quantities | 73.5% | -0.106 | -7.76 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.26 | 0.222 | -0.06 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 41.9
- Final score
- 42/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 22.5 | 24.5 (band 18.09782608695652 to 40%) | 87.4 |
| Fat | 14.2 | 15.4 (band 5.529891304347825 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.7 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 88 |
| Calcium | 0.8 | 0.9 (band 0.5027173913043478 to 2.5%) | 81 |
| Phosphorus | 0.68 | 0.7 (band 0.40217391304347827 to 1.6%) | 86.9 |
| Sodium | 0.26 | 0.3 (band 0.10054347826086957+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 80.6 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 370 | 402.2 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
- 3b103 (Iron) 76.4mg
- 3b202 (Iodine) 1.9mg
- 3b405 (Copper) 7.5mg
- 3b502 (Manganese) 7.9mg
- 3b603 (Zinc) 134mg
- 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2mg
- Vitamin A 7,766 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 655 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 842mg/kg
- Vitamin C 143mg/kg
- Beta-carotene 2.0mg/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (26.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 5.3/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| VETERINARIAN RECOMMENDED (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE for quality, consistency & taste, or your money back (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| complete pet food for adult dogs, supporting digestive health & nourishing skin (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Highly digestible food that is gentle on the stomach (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Vitamin E & omega-6s for skin & coat nourishment (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with Chicken (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With beet pulp, a nourishing prebiotic fibre (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Sensitive Stomach & Skin Small & Mini Adult Dog Food with Chicken
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.