veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Hill's Prescription Diet w/d Dry Dog Food with Chicken
Dry Extruded · completeveterinary diet
Our verdict
Is Hill's Prescription Diet w/d Dry Dog Food with Chicken a good dog food?
We score it 22/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, vegetable by and meat and animal derivatives as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
91% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 20.70% · Fat 11.40%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter |
|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20.70% | 20.80% |
| Fat | 11.40% | 11.30% |
| Fibre | 12.50% | 12.40% |
| Ash | 5% | 5% |
| Carbohydrates | - | 42.40% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.59% | - |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.56% | - |
| Calcium | 0.86% | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.60% | - |
| Sodium | 0.22% | - |
Energy: 318 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Feed only this food. Recommended daily amounts by dog weight (grams/day): 1 kg=35, 2 kg=60, 4 kg=100, 5 kg=120, 10 kg=200, 20 kg=335, 30 kg=450, 40 kg=560, 50 kg=665, 60+ kg=119 per 10 kg. Adjust to maintain optimum weight; may divide into 2+ meals/day. Fresh water available at all times.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
3b103 (Iron) 76.2 mg/kg; 3b202 (Iodine) 1.9 mg/kg; 3b405 (Copper) 7.5 mg/kg; 3b502 (Manganese) 7.9 mg/kg; 3b603 (Zinc) 134 mg/kg; 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2 mg/kg; Vitamin A 8,569 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 706 IU/kg; Vitamin E 600 mg/kg; Vitamin C 100 mg/kg; Beta-carotene 1.5 mg/kg; L-carnitine 361 mg/kg
Technological additives
natural antioxidant
Ingredients (11)91% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 51.1%
- meat 19.6%
- other 11.2%
- oil 9.4%
- supplement 8.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 11.7 |
| 2 | derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 10.6 |
| 4 | chicken 9% | Chicken | meat · medium | 9 | 9.0 |
| 5 | vegetable protein extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 10.0 |
| 6 | oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 9.4 |
| 7 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 8.8 |
| 8 | Carbohydrate sources: Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 8.2 |
| 9 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 7.6 |
| 10 | barley | Barley | carb · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | oats. | Oats | carb · medium | - | 6.5 |
- 1. Cereals11.7% estimated
- 2. derivatives of vegetable origin11.2% estimated
- 3. meat and animal derivatives10.6% estimated
- 4. chicken 9%9% declared9.0% estimated
- 5. vegetable protein extracts10.0% estimated
- 6. oils and fats9.4% estimated
- 7. minerals8.8% estimated
- 8. Carbohydrate sources: Wheat8.2% estimated
- 9. maize7.6% estimated
- 10. barley7.0% estimated
- 11. oats.6.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Hill's
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.co.uk/
- Address
- Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 22 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages brought the score down by -9.6, and the carbohydrate content reduced it by -7. The processing format added a further -6.7, while lower-quality ingredients contributed -4. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.4 | 9.191 | -3.70 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.096 | +0.33 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 61.2% | -0.115 | -7.05 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.092 | -1.17 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.375 | -2.85 |
| Recipe graded poor | 61.1% | -0.065 | -3.97 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 10.6% | -0.179 | -1.89 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.7% | 0.060 | +0.70 |
| Undeclared quantities | 91.0% | -0.106 | -9.61 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -1.44 | 0.222 | -0.32 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.4 | 9.191 | -3.70 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.4% | 0.096 | +0.33 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 61.2% | -0.115 | -7.05 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 12.7% | -0.092 | -1.17 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.0% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.375 | -2.85 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 61.1% | -0.065 | -3.97 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 10.6% | -0.179 | -1.89 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 6 | -0.876 | -5.26 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.7% | 0.060 | +0.70 |
| Undeclared quantities | 91.0% | -0.106 | -9.61 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -1.44 | 0.222 | -0.32 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 22.4
- Final score
- 22/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20.7 | 22.9 (band 18 to 40%) | 83.3 |
| Fat | 11.4 | 12.6 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 99.4 |
| Fibre | 12.5 | 13.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 27.3 |
| Calcium | 0.86 | 1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 83.5 |
| Phosphorus | 0.6 | 0.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 83.1 |
| Sodium | 0.22 | 0.2 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 96 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 318 | 351.4 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 12 nutritional additives on the label
- 3b103 (Iron) 76.2 mg/kg
- 3b202 (Iodine) 1.9 mg/kg
- 3b405 (Copper) 7.5 mg/kg
- 3b502 (Manganese) 7.9 mg/kg
- 3b603 (Zinc) 134 mg/kg
- 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2 mg/kg
- Vitamin A 8,569 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 706 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 600 mg/kg
- Vitamin C 100 mg/kg
- Beta-carotene 1.5 mg/kg
- L-carnitine 361 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 1.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clinically proven nutrition to help manage diabetes (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| S+OXSHIELD: Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps manage blood sugar (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps maintain lean muscle mass (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps maintain a healthy body weight (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low levels of sugars & an optimal blend of soluble & insoluble fibre (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Appropriate levels of fat & calories (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with Chicken (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete dietetic pet food for regulation of glucose supply (Diabetes mellitus) in adult dogs. This food contains a low level of mono- and disaccharides. (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High quality protein & effective L-carnitine levels (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.