veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Our verdict
Is Hill's l/d Wet Dog Food Original a good dog food?
We score it 25/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete wet paté food for adult dogs, with cereals, oils and fats and vegetable protein extracts as the main ingredients.
Declared analysis sits below the FEDIAF minimum for protein.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You are limiting fat: 23.9% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
- You need more protein than this: 18.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 4.80% · Fat 6.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 4.80% |
| Fat | 6.20% |
| Fibre | 0.70% |
| Ash | 1.30% |
| Moisture | 74.10% |
| Carbohydrates | 12.90% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.32% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1.55% |
| Calcium | 0.18% |
| Phosphorus | 0.15% |
| Sodium | 0.05% |
Energy: 114.6 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Fresh water should be available at all times.
Feeding guide
Feed only this food. It is recommended that advice from a veterinarian be sought before use / extending the period of use. Recommended time of use: support of liver function in cases of chronic liver insufficiency initially up to 4 months; reduction of copper in liver initially up to 6 months. Fresh water should be available at all times. Adult maintenance feeding table provided on pack for 370 g cans and grams.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
3b103 (Iron) 11.7mg; 3b202 (Iodine) 0.2mg; 3b502 (Manganese) 22.8mg; 3b603 (Zinc) 25.8mg; Vitamin A 7,657 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 351 IU/kg; Total copper 0.83mg/kg; Vitamin C 59 ppm; Vitamin E 166 IU/kg
Ingredients (11)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 35.8%
- meat 27.3%
- oil 11.2%
- veg 9.1%
- supplement 8.6%
- other 8.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 11.8 |
| 2 | oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 11.2 |
| 3 | vegetable protein extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 10.7 |
| 4 | eggs and egg derivatives | Egg | meat · good | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 9.6 |
| 6 | seeds | Seeds | veg · poor | - | 9.1 |
| 7 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 8 | derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 8.0 |
| 9 | Dried Eggs | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 7.5 |
| 10 | soybean meal | Soybean Meal | carb · poor | - | 7.0 |
| 11 | maize protein meal. | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 6.4 |
- 1. Cereals11.8% estimated
- 2. oils and fats11.2% estimated
- 3. vegetable protein extracts10.7% estimated
- 4. eggs and egg derivatives10.2% estimated
- 5. meat and animal derivatives9.6% estimated
- 6. seeds9.1% estimated
- 7. minerals8.6% estimated
- 8. derivatives of vegetable origin8.0% estimated
- 9. Dried Eggs7.5% estimated
- 10. soybean meal7.0% estimated
- 11. maize protein meal.6.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Hill's
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.co.uk/
- Address
- Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 25 out of 100 based on several key factors. The presence of ingredients without printed percentages adjusted the score by -10.6, while the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed -5.3. Furthermore, the carbohydrate content resulted in a change of -5.3, and lower-quality ingredients shifted the total by -4.8. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.6 | 9.191 | -5.28 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.4% | -0.115 | -5.33 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.092 | -1.49 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.375 | -2.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 73.8% | -0.065 | -4.80 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 9.6% | -0.179 | -1.72 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 8 | -0.876 | -7.01 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.8% | 0.060 | +0.71 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Additive penalty | -1.41 | 0.222 | -0.31 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.6 | 9.191 | -5.28 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.4% | -0.115 | -5.33 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.2% | -0.092 | -1.49 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.5% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 5.8% | -0.375 | -2.19 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 73.8% | -0.065 | -4.80 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 9.6% | -0.179 | -1.72 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 8 | -0.876 | -7.01 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.8% | 0.060 | +0.71 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | yes | -1.180 | -1.18 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -1.41 | 0.222 | -0.31 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 24.8
- Final score
- 25/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 4.8 | 18.5 (band 19.911196911196907 to 40%) | 65.2 |
| Fat | 6.2 | 23.9 (band 6.083976833976832 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.7 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.4 |
| Calcium | 0.18 | 0.7 (band 0.5530888030888029 to 2.5%) | 74.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.15 | 0.6 (band 0.44247104247104235 to 1.6%) | 77.1 |
| Sodium | 0.05 | 0.2 (band 0.11061776061776059+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.2 | 1.2 (band 1 to 2%) | 82 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 114.6 | 442.5 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 9 declared nutrients (combined weight 105); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- 3b103 (Iron) 11.7mg
- 3b202 (Iodine) 0.2mg
- 3b502 (Manganese) 22.8mg
- 3b603 (Zinc) 25.8mg
- Vitamin A 7,657 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 351 IU/kg
- Total copper 0.83mg/kg
- Vitamin C 59 ppm
- Vitamin E 166 IU/kg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Made with 100% cage-free eggs or egg derivatives (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Clinically proven antioxidants (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps the liver tissue repair itself (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps avoid nutrient deficiencies & excesses related to liver issues (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports a healthy immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Controlled level of highly digestible protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% SATISFACTION GUARANTEE for quality, consistency & taste, or your money back (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Proud to have helped 15 MILLION SHELTER PETS find a forever home (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low copper to minimise accumulation in the liver (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.