veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Hill's i/d Low Fat Dry Dog Food
Dry Extruded · completeveterinary dietClear label
Our verdict
Is Hill's i/d Low Fat Dry Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 29/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with cereals, meat and animal derivatives and chicken as the main ingredients.
90% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated chicken and turkey
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists cereals
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 24% · Fat 8.20%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 24% |
| Fat | 8.20% |
| Fibre | 2.10% |
| Ash | 5.40% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Carbohydrates | 51.80% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.50% |
| Calcium | 0.80% |
| Phosphorus | 0.60% |
| Sodium | 0.31% |
Energy: 335 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Feed only this food. It is recommended that a veterinarian's opinion be sought before use. Feed the correct daily amount shown according to dog's size. Adjust amount to maintain optimum weight; the amount may be divided into 2+ meals/day. Recommended time of use: initially up to 12 weeks, but lifetime in cases of chronic pancreatic insufficiency. Fresh water should be available at all times.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
3b103 (Iron) 73.6mg; 3b202 (Iodine) 1.8mg; 3b405 (Copper) 7.3mg; 3b502 (Manganese) 7.6mg; 3b603 (Zinc) 129mg; 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2mg; Vitamin A 8,782 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 705 IU/kg; Vitamin E 578mg; Vitamin C 100mg; Beta-carotene 1.5mg
Technological additives
with natural antioxidant
Ingredients (20)90% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- veg 24.5%
- carb 22.2%
- meat 20.1%
- fibre 11.6%
- oil 10.2%
- other 6.0%
- supplement 5.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cereals | Cereals | carb · poor | - | 6.5 |
| 2 | meat and animal derivatives | Meat and Animal Derivatives | meat · poor | - | 6.4 |
| 3 | 9% chicken | Chicken | meat · medium | 9 | 9.0 |
| 4 | vegetable protein extracts | Vegetable protein extracts | carb · poor | - | 6.2 |
| 5 | derivatives of vegetable origin | Vegetable By-Products | other · poor | - | 6.0 |
| 6 | oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 5.8 |
| 7 | seeds | Seeds | veg · poor | - | 5.6 |
| 8 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 5.5 |
| 9 | vegetables | Vegetables | veg · medium | - | 5.3 |
| 10 | 1% ginger | Ginger | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 11 | fruit | Fruit | veg · medium | - | 5.1 |
| 12 | Highly digestible ingredients: Broken rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | chicken and turkey meal | Dehydrated Chicken and Turkey | meat · medium | - | 4.7 |
| 14 | maize protein meal | Maize gluten | carb · poor | - | 4.5 |
| 15 | animal fat | Unspecified Animal Fats and Oils | oil · poor | - | 4.4 |
| 16 | ActivBiome+ Digestion prebiotic blend (7.5%): Dried beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 4.2 |
| 17 | flaxseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 4.0 |
| 18 | ground pecan shell | Ground Pecan Shell | fibre · poor | - | 3.8 |
| 19 | dried citrus pulp | Citrus Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 20 | dried cranberries. | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 3.5 |
- 1. Cereals6.5% estimated
- 2. meat and animal derivatives6.4% estimated
- 3. 9% chicken9% declared9.0% estimated
- 4. vegetable protein extracts6.2% estimated
- 5. derivatives of vegetable origin6.0% estimated
- 6. oils and fats5.8% estimated
- 7. seeds5.6% estimated
- 8. minerals5.5% estimated
- 9. vegetables5.3% estimated
- 10. 1% ginger1% declared1.0% estimated
- 11. fruit5.1% estimated
- 12. Highly digestible ingredients: Broken rice4.9% estimated
- 13. chicken and turkey meal4.7% estimated
- 14. maize protein meal4.5% estimated
- 15. animal fat4.4% estimated
- 16. ActivBiome+ Digestion prebiotic blend (7.5%): Dried beet pulp4.2% estimated
- 17. flaxseed4.0% estimated
- 18. ground pecan shell3.8% estimated
- 19. dried citrus pulp3.6% estimated
- 20. dried cranberries.3.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: Hill's
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.co.uk/
- Address
- Hill’s Pet Nutrition, Inc. Goldsworth Place 1 Forge End Woking GU21 6DB
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 29 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -9.5 points. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, the carbohydrate content contributed -3.4 points, and lower-quality ingredients contributed -3.2 points. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -1.87 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.8% | 0.096 | +0.36 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 29.3% | -0.115 | -3.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.092 | -1.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 4.5% | -0.375 | -1.68 |
| Recipe graded poor | 49.3% | -0.065 | -3.20 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 6.4% | -0.179 | -1.14 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 9 | -0.876 | -7.89 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.5% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 90.0% | -0.106 | -9.50 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -1.01 | 0.222 | -0.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | -0.2 | 9.191 | -1.87 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 3.8% | 0.096 | +0.36 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 29.3% | -0.115 | -3.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 15.1% | -0.092 | -1.39 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 15.0% | -0.005 | -0.08 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 7.5% | -0.012 | -0.09 |
| Other share of dry matter | 4.5% | -0.375 | -1.68 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 49.3% | -0.065 | -3.20 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 6.4% | -0.179 | -1.14 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 9 | -0.876 | -7.89 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 6.5% | 0.060 | +0.39 |
| Undeclared quantities | 90.0% | -0.106 | -9.50 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -1.01 | 0.222 | -0.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 28.8
- Final score
- 29/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 24 | 26.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 92.1 |
| Fat | 8.2 | 8.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 84.1 |
| Fibre | 2.1 | 2.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 93.8 |
| Calcium | 0.8 | 0.9 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 81.1 |
| Phosphorus | 0.6 | 0.7 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 82.6 |
| Sodium | 0.31 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.3 | 1.3 (band 1 to 2%) | 90 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 335 | 364.1 | 100 |
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
- 3b103 (Iron) 73.6mg
- 3b202 (Iodine) 1.8mg
- 3b405 (Copper) 7.3mg
- 3b502 (Manganese) 7.6mg
- 3b603 (Zinc) 129mg
- 3b801 (Selenium) 0.2mg
- Vitamin A 8,782 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 705 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 578mg
- Vitamin C 100mg
- Beta-carotene 1.5mg
High confidence: full analysis plus minerals or omegas and declared energy.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (10% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 2/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| highly digestible complete dietetic pet food for reduction of intestinal absorptive disorders, compensation for maldigestion and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency in adult dogs (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| great tasting nutrition to help settle digestive upsets for dogs that need a low fat formula (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| increased level of sodium and potassium and highly digestible ingredients (on pack) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| with Chicken (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ActivBiome+ ingredient technology is a proprietary blend of prebiotics shown to rapidly activate the gut microbiome to support digestive health and well-being (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.