Healthy Paws British Turkey & Brown Rice
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Healthy Paws British Turkey & Brown Rice a good dog food?
We score it 58/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with dehydrated turkey protein, rice and prairie meal as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
38% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated turkey protein
- Your dog avoids fish: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 16%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 28% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
| Calcium | 1.67% |
| Phosphorus | 1.21% |
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 14400 IU; Vitamin D3 2160 IU; Vitamin C 168 mg; Vitamin E 100 mg; Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 160 mg; Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 133 mg; Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate 105 mg; Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 58 mg; Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 1.57 mg; Sodium Selenite 0.64 mg; DL-M 2200 mg
Ingredients (8)38% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 47.9%
- meat 30.0%
- oil 13.3%
- fibre 8.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dried Turkey 28% | Dehydrated turkey protein | meat · good | 28 | 28.0 |
| 2 | Brown Rice 26% | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | 26 | 26.0 |
| 3 | White Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 11.7 |
| 4 | Prairie Meal | Prairie Meal | carb · medium | - | 10.2 |
| 5 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 8.8 |
| 6 | Turkey Fat 6% | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 7 | Sunflower Oil | Sunflower oil | oil · good | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Turkey Stock 2% | Turkey | meat · medium | 2 | 2.0 |
- 1. Dried Turkey 28%28% declared28.0% estimated
- 2. Brown Rice 26%26% declared26.0% estimated
- 3. White Rice11.7% estimated
- 4. Prairie Meal10.2% estimated
- 5. Beet Pulp8.8% estimated
- 6. Turkey Fat 6%6% declared6.0% estimated
- 7. Sunflower Oil7.3% estimated
- 8. Turkey Stock 2%2% declared2.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Healthy Paws
- Website
- https://healthypaws.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +44 (0)116 260 2100
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- healthypaws.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 58 out of 100. The processing format contributed -6.7 points to the score, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.8. On the other hand, the carbohydrate content contributed -5.5, and ingredients without printed percentages added -4.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.76 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 29.0% | 0.096 | +2.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 47.4% | -0.115 | -5.46 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.36 |
| Undeclared quantities | 38.0% | -0.106 | -4.01 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.76 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 29.0% | 0.096 | +2.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 47.4% | -0.115 | -5.46 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.092 | -1.36 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 38.0% | -0.106 | -4.01 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.3
- Final score
- 58/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.9 | 100 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.7 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.67 | 1.8 | 84.7 |
| Phosphorus | 1.21 | 1.3 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 | 100 |
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 14400 IU
- Vitamin D3 2160 IU
- Vitamin C 168 mg
- Vitamin E 100 mg
- Ferrous Sulphate Monohydrate 160 mg
- Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate 133 mg
- Manganous Sulphate Monohydrate 105 mg
- Cupric Sulphate Pentahydrate 58 mg
- Calcium Iodate Anhydrous 1.57 mg
- Sodium Selenite 0.64 mg
- DL-M 2200 mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (62% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| vegetables, herbs and fruits support the immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| single source of protein makes it highly digestible and extremely tasty (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports Joint Health With added Glucosamine, Chondroitin and MSM to support and maintain healthy hips and joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Bone Growth & Development Optimum Calcium/Phosphorus ratio to support and maintain healthy hips and joints for growing puppies (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ideal For Fussy Eaters The natural goodness of poultry meat, rabbit and duck are highly digestible and very palatable, ideal for fussy eaters (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Aids Flea and Worm Prevention Contains a unique blend of herbs and vegetables aiding the prevention of flea and worm infestation (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Brain Health Rich in DHA supporting brain development and eye function (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally high in vitamin C and anti oxidants (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hypoallergenic (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to British Turkey & Brown Rice
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.