Happy Dog Sensible Mini Puppy Lamb & Rice
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Happy Dog Sensible Mini Puppy Lamb & Rice a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
56% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists dried lamb protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists mussel meat meal
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 30% · Fat 16%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 30% |
| Fat | 16% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.20% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2% |
| Calcium | 1.45% |
| Phosphorus | 1.05% |
| Sodium | 0.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A (3a672a) 17000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 (3a671) 900 IU/kg; Vitamin E (as 3a700) 120 mg/kg; Vitamin C (as 3a312) 30 mg/kg; Iron (as 3b103) 65 mg/kg; Copper (as 3b405) 14 mg/kg; Zinc (as 3b603, 3b606) 125 mg/kg; Manganese (as 3b502) 30 mg/kg; Iodine (calcium iodate, anhydrous 3b202) 2.5 mg/kg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite 3b801) 0.2 mg/kg; L-tryptophan (3c440) 1000 mg/kg
Technological additives
Tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils 1b306(i)
Ingredients (32)56% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 31.6%
- veg 22.6%
- meat 22.1%
- supplement 9.8%
- fibre 6.7%
- oil 2.6%
- other 2.5%
- additive 2.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lamb protein (19.5%) | Dried Lamb Protein | meat · good | 19.5 | 19.5 |
| 2 | rice (19%) | Rice - white | carb · medium | 19 | 19.0 |
| 3 | corn flour | Corn flour | carb · medium | - | 2.7 |
| 4 | greaves | Greaves | meat · poor | - | 2.7 |
| 5 | oils and fats | Oils and Fats | oil · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 6 | corn | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 7 | rice protein (5%) | Rice Protein | carb · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 8 | hydrolysed protein | Protein Hydrolysate | other · poor | - | 2.5 |
| 9 | beet molasses pulp | Blackstrap molasses | carb · medium | - | 2.5 |
| 10 | cellulose | Cellulose | fibre · medium | - | 2.4 |
| 11 | apple pomace | Apple Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 2.4 |
| 12 | potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 2.3 |
| 13 | yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.3 |
| 14 | sodium chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 2.2 |
| 15 | seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 2.2 |
| 16 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 2.1 |
| 17 | psyllium husk | Psyllium fibre | fibre · good | - | 2.1 |
| 18 | yucca schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 2.0 |
| 19 | mussel meat (0.04%) | Mussel Meat Meal | meat · medium | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| 20 | milk thistle | Milk Thistle | veg · good | - | 2.0 |
| 21 | yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 1.9 |
| 22 | artichoke | Artichoke | veg · good | - | 1.9 |
| 23 | dandelion | Dandelion Root | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 24 | ginger | Ginger | veg · good | - | 1.8 |
| 25 | birch leaves | Birch Leaves | veg · medium | - | 1.7 |
| 26 | nettle | Nettles | veg · good | - | 1.7 |
| 27 | chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 28 | coriander | Coriander | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 29 | rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 30 | sage | Sage | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 31 | liquorice root | Licorice Root | supplement · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 32 | thyme (0.15%) | Thyme | veg · good | 0.15 | 0.1 |
- 1. Lamb protein (19.5%)19.5% declared19.5% estimated
- 2. rice (19%)19% declared19.0% estimated
- 3. corn flour2.7% estimated
- 4. greaves2.7% estimated
- 5. oils and fats2.6% estimated
- 6. corn2.6% estimated
- 7. rice protein (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 8. hydrolysed protein2.5% estimated
- 9. beet molasses pulp2.5% estimated
- 10. cellulose2.4% estimated
- 11. apple pomace2.4% estimated
- 12. potassium chloride2.3% estimated
- 13. yeast2.3% estimated
- 14. sodium chloride2.2% estimated
- 15. seaweed2.2% estimated
- 16. linseed2.1% estimated
- 17. psyllium husk2.1% estimated
- 18. yucca schidigera2.0% estimated
- 19. mussel meat (0.04%)0.04% declared0.04% estimated
- 20. milk thistle2.0% estimated
- 21. yeast1.9% estimated
- 22. artichoke1.9% estimated
- 23. dandelion1.8% estimated
- 24. ginger1.8% estimated
- 25. birch leaves1.7% estimated
- 26. nettle1.7% estimated
- 27. chamomile1.6% estimated
- 28. coriander1.6% estimated
- 29. rosemary1.5% estimated
- 30. sage1.5% estimated
- 31. liquorice root1.4% estimated
- 32. thyme (0.15%)0.15% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-12
Brand and contact: Happy Dog
- Website
- https://www.happydoguk.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- (530) 267-6262
- Address
- 300 Salem Street Chico,CA 95928
- Contact page
- www.happydog.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-12
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.happydoguk.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 47 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.2 points to the score. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7. Furthermore, ingredients without printed percentages subtracted -5.9, and the carbohydrate content contributed -5.1 to the calculation.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 8.7% | 0.096 | +0.84 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 44.4% | -0.115 | -5.11 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.092 | -0.37 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.5% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.1% | 0.163 | +0.51 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 14.4% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.375 | -0.74 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.8% | -0.065 | -0.64 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 2.6% | -0.179 | -0.47 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 56.3% | -0.106 | -5.95 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -2.66 | 0.222 | -0.59 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 8.7% | 0.096 | +0.84 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 44.4% | -0.115 | -5.11 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 4.0% | -0.092 | -0.37 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.5% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.1% | 0.163 | +0.51 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 14.4% | -0.012 | -0.18 |
| Other share of dry matter | 2.0% | -0.375 | -0.74 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.8% | -0.065 | -0.64 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 2.6% | -0.179 | -0.47 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 56.3% | -0.106 | -5.95 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -2.66 | 0.222 | -0.59 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 46.6
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review; Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 30 | 33.1 | 100 |
| Fat | 16 | 17.7 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.45 | 1.6 | 99.9 |
| Phosphorus | 1.05 | 1.2 | 100 |
| Sodium | 0.5 | 0.6 (band 0.22+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100, omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 85); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 11 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A (3a672a) 17000 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 (3a671) 900 IU/kg
- Vitamin E (as 3a700) 120 mg/kg
- Vitamin C (as 3a312) 30 mg/kg
- Iron (as 3b103) 65 mg/kg
- Copper (as 3b405) 14 mg/kg
- Zinc (as 3b603, 3b606) 125 mg/kg
- Manganese (as 3b502) 30 mg/kg
- Iodine (calcium iodate, anhydrous 3b202) 2.5 mg/kg
- Selenium (Sodium Selenite 3b801) 0.2 mg/kg
- L-tryptophan (3c440) 1000 mg/kg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (43.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 8.7/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "grain-free" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 100% animal protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| soy-free (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With easy-to-digest lamb and rice, it's kind on young tummies while supporting steady growth and strong joints (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| balanced, and delicious meal (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Outstanding Price/Performance award (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no added sugar (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain-free (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| crafted for small breed puppies who need gentle nutrition without poultry (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Sensible Mini Puppy Lamb & Rice
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.