Green Pantry Low Allergen Skin and Coat Care Fresh Food
Fresh Shelf · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Green Pantry Low Allergen Skin and Coat Care Fresh Food a good dog food?
We score it 68/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete shelf-stable fresh food for dogs of all life stages, with duck, oats and carrots as the main ingredients.
40% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids duck: the label lists duck
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oats
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 12.20% · Fat 7.60%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 12.20% |
| Fat | 7.60% |
| Fibre | 2.70% |
| Ash | 3.30% |
| Moisture | 57% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.26% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 0.88% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Freshly Cooked & Cupboard Stored – A Complete Wet Food For All Adult & Senior Dogs
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 2500 IU; Vitamin D3 250 IU; Vitamin E 20 IU; Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 32.5 mg; Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 15 mg; Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 2.5 mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.5 mg
Ingredients (14)40% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 63.9%
- fibre 8.5%
- supplement 8.0%
- carb 8.0%
- veg 5.0%
- oil 3.6%
- additive 3.2%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Duck (60%) | Duck | meat · medium | 60 | 60.0 |
| 2 | Oats | Oats | carb · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 3 | Carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 6.7 |
| 4 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.2 |
| 5 | Cellulose | Cellulose | fibre · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 6 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 7 | Plasma | Plasma Protein | meat · medium | - | 4.6 |
| 8 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 4.1 |
| 9 | 0.03% calcium carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 10 | 0.03% citrus extract | Citric Acid | additive · medium | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 11 | 0.03% maltodextrin | Maltodextrin | carb · poor | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 12 | 0.03% sodium chloride | Salt | additive · poor | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| 13 | Nettle (0.1%) | Nettles | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 14 | Chamomile (0.015%) | Chamomile | veg · good | 0.015 | 0.01 |
- 1. Duck (60%)60% declared60.0% estimated
- 2. Oats7.2% estimated
- 3. Carrots6.7% estimated
- 4. Minerals6.2% estimated
- 5. Cellulose5.7% estimated
- 6. Beet Pulp5.2% estimated
- 7. Plasma4.6% estimated
- 8. Salmon Oil4.1% estimated
- 9. 0.03% calcium carbonate0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 10. 0.03% citrus extract0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 11. 0.03% maltodextrin0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 12. 0.03% sodium chloride0.03% declared0.03% estimated
- 13. Nettle (0.1%)0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 14. Chamomile (0.015%)0.015% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Green Pantry
- Website
- https://greenpantry.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01553 811320
- Contact page
- greenpantry.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- greenpantry.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We scored this food 68 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +4.9 points. Ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -4.2, the meat content contributed +3.4, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 35.8% | 0.096 | +3.43 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.9% | -0.115 | -1.71 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.092 | -0.70 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.1% | 0.163 | +0.99 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.6% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.9% | -0.065 | -0.19 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.8% | 0.060 | +0.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.8% | -0.106 | -4.20 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -3.82 | 0.222 | -0.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 35.8% | 0.096 | +3.43 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.9% | -0.115 | -1.71 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.092 | -0.70 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 6.1% | 0.163 | +0.99 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 15.6% | -0.012 | -0.19 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.9% | -0.065 | -0.19 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.8% | 0.060 | +0.17 |
| Undeclared quantities | 39.8% | -0.106 | -4.20 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.82 | 0.222 | -0.85 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 67.8
- Final score
- 68/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 12.2 | 28.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 98.3 |
| Fat | 7.6 | 17.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.7 | 6.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 7 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 2500 IU
- Vitamin D3 250 IU
- Vitamin E 20 IU
- Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 32.5 mg
- Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 15 mg
- Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 2.5 mg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.5 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (60.2% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 12/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supports dry, itchy skin and promotes a healthy, shiny coat (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Botanical blend chosen for natural skin and coat support (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Salmon Oil provides balanced Omega-3, 6 & 9 for skin barrier health and reduced inflammation (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| AuraGuard helps support immune health and protect against oxidative stress (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete, well-balanced meal with all essential nutrients (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made with 60% duck, a novel protein that is well tolerated by sensitive dogs (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| duck (60%), oats, carrots, minerals, cellulose, beet pulp, plasma, salmon oil, auraguard, nettle, chamomile (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in Natural Omega-3 and 6 (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally preserved and packed in recyclable packaging (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% natural, UK-sourced ingredients (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Low Allergen Skin and Coat Care Fresh Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.