Our verdict
Is Golden Eagle Large & Giant Breed Puppy a good dog food?
We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with dried chicken protein, rice and oats as the main ingredients.
75% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at giant dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon protein
- Your dog avoids pork: the label lists dehydrated pork protein
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 23% · Fat 13%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 23% |
| Fat | 13% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Calcium | 1.40% |
| Phosphorus | 1% |
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (26)75% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 41.5%
- veg 20.1%
- carb 11.6%
- supplement 9.2%
- fibre 7.0%
- mineral 5.0%
- oil 2.9%
- additive 2.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal (25%) | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | 25 | 25.0 |
| 2 | Wholegrain Brown Rice | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 3 | Wholegrain White Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 3.9 |
| 4 | Oatmeal | Oats | carb · medium | - | 3.8 |
| 5 | Refined Chicken Fat | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 6 | Whole Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 3.6 |
| 7 | Tomato Pomace | Tomato Pomace | fibre · medium | - | 3.6 |
| 8 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 9 | Egg | Egg | meat · good | - | 3.4 |
| 10 | Salmon Meal | Salmon Protein | meat · good | - | 3.3 |
| 11 | Pork Meal | Dehydrated Pork Protein | meat · good | - | 3.2 |
| 12 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.2 |
| 13 | Carrot Flake | Carrots | veg · good | - | 3.1 |
| 14 | Lucerne | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 3.0 |
| 15 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 2.9 |
| 16 | Chicken Liver Gravy | Liver | meat · good | - | 2.8 |
| 17 | Monosodium Phosphate | Sodium phosphate | additive · poor | - | 2.8 |
| 18 | Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 2.7 |
| 19 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 2.6 |
| 20 | Seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 2.5 |
| 21 | Yucca Joint Care Pack | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 22 | Dried Apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
| 23 | Cranberry | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 2.3 |
| 24 | Selenium | Selenium | mineral · good | - | 2.2 |
| 25 | Beta Carotene | Beta Carotene | supplement · good | - | 2.1 |
| 26 | L-Carnitine | L-Carnitine | supplement · medium | - | 2.1 |
- 1. Chicken Meal (25%)25% declared25.0% estimated
- 2. Wholegrain Brown Rice3.9% estimated
- 3. Wholegrain White Rice3.9% estimated
- 4. Oatmeal3.8% estimated
- 5. Refined Chicken Fat3.7% estimated
- 6. Whole Linseed3.6% estimated
- 7. Tomato Pomace3.6% estimated
- 8. Beet Pulp3.5% estimated
- 9. Egg3.4% estimated
- 10. Salmon Meal3.3% estimated
- 11. Pork Meal3.2% estimated
- 12. Peas3.2% estimated
- 13. Carrot Flake3.1% estimated
- 14. Lucerne3.0% estimated
- 15. Salmon Oil2.9% estimated
- 16. Chicken Liver Gravy2.8% estimated
- 17. Monosodium Phosphate2.8% estimated
- 18. Salt2.7% estimated
- 19. Potassium Chloride2.6% estimated
- 20. Seaweed2.5% estimated
- 21. Yucca Joint Care Pack2.4% estimated
- 22. Dried Apple2.4% estimated
- 23. Cranberry2.3% estimated
- 24. Selenium2.2% estimated
- 25. Beta Carotene2.1% estimated
- 26. L-Carnitine2.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Golden Eagle
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.goldeneaglepetfoods.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 56 out of 100. The meat content contributed +2.9 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +6.6 points to the total. However, the processing format reduced the score by -6.7 and ingredients without printed percentages decreased it by -7.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.57 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 30.4% | 0.096 | +2.92 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.5% | -0.115 | -1.55 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.092 | -0.35 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.2% | 0.163 | +0.52 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.7% | -0.065 | -0.17 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.7% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 75.0% | -0.106 | -7.92 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -3.27 | 0.222 | -0.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.57 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 30.4% | 0.096 | +2.92 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 13.5% | -0.115 | -1.55 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.8% | -0.092 | -0.35 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 12.4% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 3.2% | 0.163 | +0.52 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 11.2% | -0.012 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.7% | -0.065 | -0.17 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.7% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 75.0% | -0.106 | -7.92 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -3.27 | 0.222 | -0.73 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Subtotal
- 56.4
- Final score
- 56/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 23 | 25 | 100 |
| Fat | 13 | 14.1 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.4 | 1.5 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 | 100 |
Scored over 5 declared nutrients (combined weight 70); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (25% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural, holistic and wheat-free dog food that supports the balanced growth of large puppies. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains the unique holistic pre- and probiotic supplements BioHealth™ and LactoHealth™. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| without chemical preservatives, flavors or dyes (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| multiprotein source diet, meaning there are several animal proteins in the formula (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Large & Giant Breed Puppy
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.