Gilpa Titanium Chicken with vegetables
Dry Extruded complete Clear label
Is Gilpa Titanium Chicken with vegetables a good dog food?
We score it 54/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a final score of 54 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +4.4 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -7.8. Additionally, the processing format deducted -7 and the carbohydrate content contributed -3.4.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
60% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe54
- Nutritionallow97
- Transparency43
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for dogs of all life stages, with dehydrated poultry proteins, chicken and wheat as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 25%
- Fat
- 15%
- Fibre
- 2.50%
- Ash
- 6.50%
Additives & feeding info
No additives recorded yet.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists green-lipped mussel
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (21)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poultry meal | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat | good | - | 4.6 |
| 2 | 32% chicken | Chicken | meat | medium | 32 | 32.0 |
| 3 | wheat | Wheat | carb | poor | - | 4.5 |
| 4 | barley | Barley | carb | medium | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | maize | Maize / Corn | carb | poor | - | 4.2 |
| 6 | chicken fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | - | 4.1 |
| 7 | rice 4% | Rice - white | carb | medium | 4 | 4.0 |
| 8 | vegetables | Vegetables | veg | medium | - | 3.9 |
| 9 | 4% peas | Peas | veg | good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 10 | chicken gravy | Chicken | meat | medium | - | 3.8 |
| 11 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 3.6 |
| 12 | salmon oil 0.25% | Salmon Oil | oil | good | 0.25 | 0.3 |
| 13 | alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg | good | - | 3.5 |
| 14 | linseed | Linseed | veg | good | - | 3.4 |
| 15 | sage | Sage | veg | good | - | 3.2 |
| 16 | oregano | Oregano | veg | good | - | 3.1 |
| 17 | mint | Mint | veg | good | - | 3.0 |
| 18 | rosemary | Rosemary | veg | good | - | 2.8 |
| 19 | turmeric and ginger | Turmeric | veg | good | - | 2.7 |
| 20 | New Zealand green lipped mussel extract | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement | good | - | 2.6 |
| 21 | yucca extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 2.4 |
Brand
- Website
- https://www.gilpa.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- +44 (0)1707 367900
- Address
- Gilbertson & Page Limited, 45-55 Brownfields, Welwyn Garden City, Hertfordshire, AL7 1AN
- Contact page
- www.gilpa.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.gilpa.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.915 | +4.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 27.2% | 0.116 | +3.15 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 30.1% | -0.113 | -3.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.088 | -0.76 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.2% | -0.002 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.0% | -0.009 | -0.14 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.7% | -0.045 | -0.39 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.868 | -1.74 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.056 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 59.8% | -0.131 | -7.82 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 27.2 | -0.073 | -1.99 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.915 | +4.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 27.2% | 0.116 | +3.15 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 30.1% | -0.113 | -3.39 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 8.6% | -0.088 | -0.76 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 18.2% | -0.002 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.0% | -0.009 | -0.14 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 8.7% | -0.045 | -0.39 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.868 | -1.74 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.056 | +0.25 |
| Undeclared quantities | 59.8% | -0.131 | -7.82 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 27.2 | -0.073 | -1.99 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Subtotal
- 54.1
- Final score
- 54/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 54/100 | current |
| v1 | 60/100 | |
| v1.9 | 60/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25 | 27.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 95 |
| Fat | 15 | 16.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.6 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (40.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 8.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| essential fats including salmon oil and linseed providing balanced omega 6 and 3’s for healthy skin and shiny coat. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Featuring New Zealand green-lipped mussel for healthy joint support. (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added support for healthy joints, New Zealand green-lipped mussel and mixed herbs (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Dr. John Titanium is a complete, balanced dry dog food rich in chicken with rice and vegetables. (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Recyclable packaging (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| balanced bone minerals to suit the growth requirements of junior and young adult working dogs over 4 months old as well. (on page) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| Balanced nutrients for healthy growth. (on page) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| With higher nutrient and energy levels, the recipe is perfect for active working adults (on page) | High/low level | Manufacturer assertion |
| Rich in chicken with rice and vegetables (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Made from high quality chicken, a rich source of protein, amino acids and bio-available minerals (on page) | Nutrient | Manufacturer assertion |
| with wholegrain cereals and vegetables adding dietary fibre and vitamins (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| starting with chicken as the first ingredient providing healthy protein (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Gilpa
Alternatives to Titanium Chicken with vegetables
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.