Gentle Kitchen Rustic Chicken Adult Fresh Dog Food
Fresh Frozen · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Gentle Kitchen Rustic Chicken Adult Fresh Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 84/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete frozen fresh food for adult dogs, with chicken, rice and carrots as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 25.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11.50% · Fat 10.90%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11.50% |
| Fat | 10.90% |
| Fibre | 1.90% |
| Ash | 3.60% |
| Moisture | 57.10% |
Energy: 190 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Frozen straight after cooking; delivered frozen next day via DPD (Tuesday-Friday).
Feeding guide
Daily feed: 5kg 200g-250g, 10kg 300g-400g, 15kg 400g-500g, 20kg 500g-700g, 25kg 700g-800g, 30kg 800g-900g, 35kg 900g-1000g, 40kg+ 1000g-1150g
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A (3a672a) 5,000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 (3a671) 500 IU/kg; Vitamin E (3a700) 167mg/kg; Iron (3b103) 25mg/kg; Iodine (3b202) 1.25mg/kg; Copper (3b405) 2.5mg/kg; Manganese (3b503) 0.83mg/kg; Zinc (3b605) 42mg/kg; Selenium (3b801) 0.1mg/kg
Ingredients (9)16% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 67.0%
- veg 13.6%
- supplement 9.2%
- carb 8.9%
- oil 1.3%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken 67% | Chicken | meat · medium | 67 | 67.0 |
| 2 | Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 8.9 |
| 3 | Carrot 5.2% | Carrots | veg · good | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| 4 | Courgette 5.2% | Courgette | veg · good | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| 5 | Chicory (pulp) 3.2% | Chicory | veg · good | 3.2 | 3.2 |
| 6 | Vitamins 2.5% | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 6.7 |
| 8 | Hemp Oil 0.8% | Hemp Oil | oil · good | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 9 | Salmon Oil 0.5% | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
- 1. Chicken 67%67% declared67.0% estimated
- 2. Rice8.9% estimated
- 3. Carrot 5.2%5.2% declared5.2% estimated
- 4. Courgette 5.2%5.2% declared5.2% estimated
- 5. Chicory (pulp) 3.2%3.2% declared3.2% estimated
- 6. Vitamins 2.5%2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 7. Minerals6.7% estimated
- 8. Hemp Oil 0.8%0.8% declared0.8% estimated
- 9. Salmon Oil 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-26
Brand and contact: Gentle Kitchen
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-26
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petscorner.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The score on our scale comes to 84 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5 points, and the meat content contributed +4.7 points to lift the rating. The carbohydrate content deducted -2.4 points, while the processing format deducted -2.4 points, pulling the final tally back down.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 48.9% | 0.096 | +4.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.115 | -2.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.0% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 15.6% | -0.106 | -1.65 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.5 | 9.191 | +4.99 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 48.9% | 0.096 | +4.69 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 20.4% | -0.115 | -2.35 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.4% | -0.092 | -0.31 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.3% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 22.0% | -0.012 | -0.27 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 15.6% | -0.106 | -1.65 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.10 | 33.786 | +37.16 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | yes | -2.354 | -2.35 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 84.1
- Final score
- 84/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 11.5 | 26.8 (band 19.93006993006993 to 40%) | 90.6 |
| Fat | 10.9 | 25.4 (band 6.089743589743589 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1.9 | 4.4 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 190 | 442.9 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A (3a672a) 5,000 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 (3a671) 500 IU/kg
- Vitamin E (3a700) 167mg/kg
- Iron (3b103) 25mg/kg
- Iodine (3b202) 1.25mg/kg
- Copper (3b405) 2.5mg/kg
- Manganese (3b503) 0.83mg/kg
- Zinc (3b605) 42mg/kg
- Selenium (3b801) 0.1mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (84.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single Meat Protein - The single meat protein makes this recipe easy to digest and perfect for sensitive tummies. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A truly gentle recipe made with carefully chosen hypoallergenic ingredients, including rice a super digestible and slow release carbohydrate. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Chicory is a natural source of prebiotic fibres that feed and nourish dogs friendly gut bacteria. Perfect for supporting dogs digestive health and improving their stool function. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Featuring an utterly delicious blend of Salmon and Hemp Oil. These are packed with omega 3 and 6 fatty acids for joint mobility, to support brain health and promote a healthy glossy coat. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Carrot & courgette are packed with vitamin A for healthy vision and fibre for bowel health. (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Crafted with 67% real fresh chicken (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Rustic Chicken Adult Fresh Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.