Forthglade Natural Soft Bite Treats with Turkey

Treat · complementaryClear label

Natural Soft Bite Treats with Turkey
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Forthglade Natural Soft Bite Treats with Turkey a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary semi-moist dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with turkey, rice and rye as the main ingredients.

How we score

66% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 19 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Turkey): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 3 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 22.60% · Fat 11%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein22.60%
Fat11%
Fibre1.80%
Ash6.20%
Moisture20%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (19)66% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • veg 40.2%
  • meat 30.0%
  • carb 15.5%
  • other 5.1%
  • oil 4.7%
  • supplement 4.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Turkey (30%)Turkeymeat · medium3030.0
2RiceRice - whitecarb · medium-5.4
3RyeRyecarb · good-5.2
4GlycerineGlycerineother · medium-5.1
5Oat FlourOat Flourcarb · medium-4.9
6Turkey FatPoultry Fatoil · medium-4.7
7MineralsVitamins and mineralssupplement · medium-4.5
8Dried Pear (2%)Pearsveg · good22.0
9Dried Apple (2%)Applesveg · good22.0
10AlfalfaAlfalfaveg · good-4.4
11RosehipRose Hipveg · good-4.2
12ChickweedChickweedveg · good-4.0
13CleaversCleaversveg · good-3.9
14PeppermintPeppermintveg · good-3.7
15ParsleyParsleyveg · good-3.5
16RosemaryRosemaryveg · good-3.4
17NettleNettlesveg · good-3.2
18Burdock RootBurdock Rootveg · good-3.0
19CamomileChamomileveg · good-2.9
  1. 1. Turkey (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
    Turkey · meat · medium
  2. 2. Rice5.4% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  3. 3. Rye5.2% estimated
    Rye · carb · good
  4. 4. Glycerine5.1% estimated
    Glycerine · other · medium
  5. 5. Oat Flour4.9% estimated
    Oat Flour · carb · medium
  6. 6. Turkey Fat4.7% estimated
    Poultry Fat · oil · medium
  7. 7. Minerals4.5% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium
  8. 8. Dried Pear (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Pears · veg · good
  9. 9. Dried Apple (2%)2% declared2.0% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  10. 10. Alfalfa4.4% estimated
    Alfalfa · veg · good
  11. 11. Rosehip4.2% estimated
    Rose Hip · veg · good
  12. 12. Chickweed4.0% estimated
    Chickweed · veg · good
  13. 13. Cleavers3.9% estimated
    Cleavers · veg · good
  14. 14. Peppermint3.7% estimated
    Peppermint · veg · good
  15. 15. Parsley3.5% estimated
    Parsley · veg · good
  16. 16. Rosemary3.4% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good
  17. 17. Nettle3.2% estimated
    Nettles · veg · good
  18. 18. Burdock Root3.0% estimated
    Burdock Root · veg · good
  19. 19. Camomile2.9% estimated
    Chamomile · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15

Brand and contact: Forthglade
Forthglade logo
Phone
0808 169 2900
Contact page
forthglade.com

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-15
Product page
forthglade.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.07
Meat share of dry matter19.7%0.096+1.90
Carb share of dry matter32.3%-0.115-3.71
Oil share of dry matter11.0%-0.092-1.01
Vegetable share of dry matter21.2%-0.005-0.11
Supplement share of dry matter9.8%-0.012-0.12
Other share of dry matter5.9%-0.375-2.22
Undeclared quantities66.0%-0.106-6.97
Processing multiplier0.9733.786+32.77
Processing: Dry Semi Moistyes-6.174-6.17
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.79.191+6.07
Meat share of dry matter19.7%0.096+1.90
Carb share of dry matter32.3%-0.115-3.71
Oil share of dry matter11.0%-0.092-1.01
Vegetable share of dry matter21.2%-0.005-0.11
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter9.8%-0.012-0.12
Other share of dry matter5.9%-0.375-2.22
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities66.0%-0.106-6.97
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9733.786+32.77
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistyes-6.174-6.17
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.05
Subtotal
51.3
Final score
51/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v351/100current
v253/100
v160/100
v1.960/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (34% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)6.8/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 3 checkable claims: 0 consistent, 3 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "Grain-free recipe for sensitive tummies" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
  • "Low in calories and fat" — the declared label says otherwise on low fat.
  • "Rich in protein" — the declared label says otherwise on high protein.

18 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Grain-free recipe for sensitive tummies (on page)Free-fromcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Free from artificial flavours, junk, or fillers (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Source of potassium, calcium & iron (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Rich source of vitamins A, C & B6 (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Source of Vitamin A that promotes healthy skin, eyes & muscles (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Low in calories and fat (on page)High/low levelcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Natural grain-free turkey treats (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Helps to reduce mouth bacteria (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Improves bad breath (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Anti-inflammatory benefits (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Helps to remove toxins (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Aids digestion (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Reduces body odour (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Hypoallergenic (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
No artificial colours, flavours or preservatives (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Rich in protein (on page)High/low levelcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Contains lutein which is good for skin, heart & eye health (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Packed with minerals such as iron & potassium (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Grain Free (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Free from Junk (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
hand-baked, grain-free and made with only natural ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Forthglade

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.