Essential Foods THE BEGINNING LARGE BREED
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label

Our verdict
Is Essential Foods THE BEGINNING LARGE BREED a good dog food?
We score it 71/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for puppies, with chicken, sweet potatoes and peas as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at large dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon
- Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 28% · Fat 14%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 28% |
| Fat | 14% |
| Fibre | 3.50% |
| Ash | 8% |
| Moisture | 8.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 1.60% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.50% |
| Calcium | 1.40% |
| Phosphorus | 1.30% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
The food should be stored in the bag, in a cool, dry place (5-18 °C). Away from direct sunlight, and with the zip carefully closed.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 15000 IU; Vitamin D3 2000 IU; Vitamin E 240 IU; Taurine 1500 mg; Zinc(Zinc Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 50 mg; Iron (Iron (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 50 mg; Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 35 mg; Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 15 mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.96 mg; Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.3 mg
Ingredients (34)21% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 70.3%
- veg 15.1%
- supplement 7.2%
- oil 4.0%
- carb 3.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh free-range British chicken and free-run welfare assured British country duck (30%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 30 | 30.0 |
| 2 | dried chicken & duck (28%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 28 | 28.0 |
| 3 | 2.33% sweet potato | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 2.33 | 2.3 |
| 4 | 2.33% peas | Peas | veg · good | 2.33 | 2.3 |
| 5 | 2.33% fresh salmon and trout | Salmon | meat · good | 2.33 | 2.3 |
| 6 | whole egg (7%) | Egg | meat · good | 7 | 7.0 |
| 7 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 8 | chicken fat (4%) | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | 4 | 4.0 |
| 9 | potato | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 1.0 |
| 10 | chicken gravy (3%) | Chicken | meat · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 11 | lucerne sprout | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 12 | vitamins | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 1.0 |
| 13 | minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 1.0 |
| 14 | MOS | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 1.0 |
| 15 | FOS | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
| 16 | glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
| 17 | MSM | MSM | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
| 18 | chondroitin | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
| 19 | cranberry | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 20 | acai | Acai | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 21 | bilberry | Bilberries | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 22 | mulberry | Mulberry | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 23 | apple | Apples | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 24 | tomato | Tomato | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
| 25 | orange | Orange | veg · medium | - | 0.7 |
| 26 | pear | Pears | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 27 | carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 28 | spinach | Spinach | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 29 | cauliflower | Cauliflower | veg · good | - | 0.7 |
| 30 | seaweed | Seaweed | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 31 | marigold | Calendula | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 32 | ginseng | Ginseng | supplement · medium | - | 0.6 |
| 33 | decaffeinated green tea | Green Tea | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
| 34 | ginger | Ginger | veg · good | - | 0.6 |
- 1. Fresh free-range British chicken and free-run welfare assured British country duck (30%)30% declared30.0% estimated
- 2. dried chicken & duck (28%)28% declared28.0% estimated
- 3. 2.33% sweet potato2.33% declared2.3% estimated
- 4. 2.33% peas2.33% declared2.3% estimated
- 5. 2.33% fresh salmon and trout2.33% declared2.3% estimated
- 6. whole egg (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
- 7. linseed1.1% estimated
- 8. chicken fat (4%)4% declared4.0% estimated
- 9. potato1.0% estimated
- 10. chicken gravy (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 11. lucerne sprout1.0% estimated
- 12. vitamins1.0% estimated
- 13. minerals1.0% estimated
- 14. MOS1.0% estimated
- 15. FOS0.9% estimated
- 16. glucosamine0.9% estimated
- 17. MSM0.9% estimated
- 18. chondroitin0.9% estimated
- 19. cranberry0.9% estimated
- 20. acai0.8% estimated
- 21. bilberry0.8% estimated
- 22. mulberry0.8% estimated
- 23. apple0.8% estimated
- 24. tomato0.8% estimated
- 25. orange0.7% estimated
- 26. pear0.7% estimated
- 27. carrot0.7% estimated
- 28. spinach0.7% estimated
- 29. cauliflower0.7% estimated
- 30. seaweed0.6% estimated
- 31. marigold0.6% estimated
- 32. ginseng0.6% estimated
- 33. decaffeinated green tea0.6% estimated
- 34. ginger0.6% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22
Brand and contact: Essential Foods
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-08-22
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- essentialfoods.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe scores 71 out of 100. The meat content contributed +6.8 points. The processing format reduced the score by -6.7. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.7 points, and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.72 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 70.7% | 0.096 | +6.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.115 | -0.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.092 | -0.70 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.6% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Undeclared quantities | 21.0% | -0.106 | -2.22 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.72 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 70.7% | 0.096 | +6.78 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 1.6% | -0.115 | -0.19 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.092 | -0.70 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.6% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 12.6% | -0.012 | -0.15 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 21.0% | -0.106 | -2.22 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 70.5
- Final score
- 71/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 28 | 30.6 | 100 |
| Fat | 14 | 15.3 | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.4 | 1.5 | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.3 | 1.4 | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.1 | 1.1 | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100, omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 6 declared nutrients (combined weight 80); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 15000 IU
- Vitamin D3 2000 IU
- Vitamin E 240 IU
- Taurine 1500 mg
- Zinc(Zinc Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 50 mg
- Iron (Iron (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 50 mg
- Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 35 mg
- Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 15 mg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 0.96 mg
- Selenium (Sodium Selenite) 0.3 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (79% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "no grain, no fillers" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "grain-free meal" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| A grain-free diet helps sensitive digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Phosphorus 1.3% (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no grain, no fillers (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fat 14.0 % (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Calcium 1.4% (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| grain-free meal (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Protein 28% (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to THE BEGINNING LARGE BREED
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.




