Dragonflyproducts Camel Scalp
Treat · complementaryClear labelFull label

Our verdict
Is Dragonflyproducts Camel Scalp a good dog food?
This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Complementary air-dried treats for puppies, made from camel.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 77.40% · Fat 5.70%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 77.40% |
| Fat | 5.70% |
| Ash | 3.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Shelf life: 18 months
Feeding guide
Always supervise your dog when feeding any treat or chew and ensure fresh drinking water is available at all times. Suitable for puppies and dogs aged: 12 weeks+
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (1)0 of 1 percentages printed
Estimated composition
- unknown 100.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Camel | unmatched | - | - | 100.0 |
- 1. Camel100.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-02
Brand and contact: Dragonflyproducts
- Phone
- 01484 246420
- Address
- Unit 4, Kiln Hill Industrial Estate, Slaithwaite, Huddersfield, HD7 5JS
- Contact page
- dragonflyproducts.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-02
- Product page
- dragonflyproducts.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.9/5 · 17,000 reviews
3 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 100.0% | -0.027 | -2.65 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.08 | 33.786 | +36.49 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 6.331 | +6.33 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.0 | 9.191 | +0.00 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.092 | +0.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 100.0% | -0.027 | -2.65 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.0% | -0.106 | +0.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.08 | 33.786 | +36.49 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | yes | 6.331 | +6.33 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.28
- Subtotal
- 68.2
- Final score
- 68/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · strong — 6 checkable claims: 6 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "naturally low-fat treat" — supported by the declared low fat data.
- "naturally low in fat" — supported by the declared low fat data.
- "low fat" — supported by the declared low fat data.
- "Long-lasting, low-fat chew for confident dogs from 12 weeks+" — supported by the declared low fat data.
- "Naturally Low Fat & Simply Made" — supported by the declared low fat data.
- "Low fat Yes" — supported by the declared low fat data.
10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| helps scrape the teeth, supporting dental hygiene as part of a natural chewing routine (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| naturally low-fat treat (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Single protein Yes (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Each piece contains just 100% camel, with no additives, preservatives, grain, gluten or rawhide (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| made from 100% camel (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| naturally low in fat (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| single-protein chew made from 100% camel (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ingredients Camel (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| low fat (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| novel protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| rawhide-free alternative to processed chews (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Long-lasting, low-fat chew for confident dogs from 12 weeks+ (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Naturally Low Fat & Simply Made (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low fat Yes (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| made from 100% air-dried camel (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Ingredients: 100% Camel (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.
