Dr. Clauder's Mini Hyposensitive Ente & Kartoffel

Dry Extruded · completeClear label

Mini Hyposensitive Ente & Kartoffel
Average
our rating

Our verdict

Is Dr. Clauder's Mini Hyposensitive Ente & Kartoffel a good dog food?

We score it 56/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with potato flour, dried duck protein and beet pulp as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

25% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Doesn't list grain ingredients.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at small dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists poultry fat
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids duck: the label lists dried duck protein
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 21% · Fat 10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein21%
Fat10%
Fibre2.90%
Ash6.20%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.75%
Omega-6 fatty acids1.70%
Calcium1.20%
Phosphorus0.90%
Sodium0.30%

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin A 13500 IE; Vitamin D3 1350 IE; Vitamin E 400 mg; Vitamin B1 11 mg; Vitamin B2 11 mg; Vitamin B6 7.3 mg; Vitamin B12 55 mcg; Biotin 350 mcg; Folsäure 2.5 mg; Niacin 45 mg; Calcium-D-Pantothenat 22 mg; Cholinchlorid 2000 mg; Kupfer 10 mg; Zink 77 mg; Jod 2.1 mg; Selen 0.22 mg

Technological additives

Tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils; Propylgallat

Ingredients (14)25% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 56.4%
  • meat 20.0%
  • oil 6.2%
  • veg 4.0%
  • fibre 3.6%
  • other 2.8%
  • unknown 2.6%
  • supplement 2.4%
  • additive 2.2%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Potato flour 53%Potato Flourcarb · medium5353.0
2Dried duck protein 20%Dried Duck Proteinmeat · good2020.0
3Dried beet pulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-3.4
4Potato proteinPotato proteincarb · medium-3.2
5Poultry fatPoultry Fatoil · medium-3.0
6LinseedLinseedveg · good-2.9
7Protein hydrolysate (from duck)Protein Hydrolysateother · poor-2.7
8Dried apple 1%Applesveg · good11.0
9Fish oil 1%Fish Oiloil · good11.0
10Chicory powder 1%Chicory rootveg · good11.0
11Monocalcium phosphateMonocalcium phosphatesupplement · good-2.5
12Dried yeastYeastsupplement · good-2.3
13Sodium chlorideSaltadditive · poor-2.1
14Safflower oilSafflower Oiloil · good-1.9
  1. 1. Potato flour 53%53% declared53.0% estimated
    Potato Flour · carb · medium
  2. 2. Dried duck protein 20%20% declared20.0% estimated
    Dried Duck Protein · meat · good
  3. 3. Dried beet pulp3.4% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  4. 4. Potato protein3.2% estimated
    Potato protein · carb · medium
  5. 5. Poultry fat3.0% estimated
    Poultry Fat · oil · medium
  6. 6. Linseed2.9% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  7. 7. Protein hydrolysate (from duck)2.7% estimated
    Protein Hydrolysate · other · poor
  8. 8. Dried apple 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  9. 9. Fish oil 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  10. 10. Chicory powder 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
    Chicory root · veg · good
  11. 11. Monocalcium phosphate2.5% estimated
    Monocalcium phosphate · supplement · good
  12. 12. Dried yeast2.3% estimated
    Yeast · supplement · good
  13. 13. Sodium chloride2.1% estimated
    Salt · additive · poor
  14. 14. Safflower oil1.9% estimated
    Safflower Oil · oil · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22

Brand and contact: Dr. Clauder's

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-08-22
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.dr-clauder.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall score of 56 out of 100 based on several key factors. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content added -6.5 points. Additionally, the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5 points, while ingredients without printed percentages added -2.6 points to the final assessment.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+5.01
Meat share of dry matter21.4%0.096+2.06
Carb share of dry matter56.5%-0.115-6.50
Oil share of dry matter7.1%-0.092-0.65
Vegetable share of dry matter3.3%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter2.3%0.163+0.37
Supplement share of dry matter2.5%-0.012-0.03
Other share of dry matter1.6%-0.375-0.61
Unrecognised share of dry matter1.5%-0.027-0.04
Recipe graded poor5.0%-0.065-0.32
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient2.8%0.060+0.17
Undeclared quantities25.0%-0.106-2.64
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Additive penalty-2.660.222-0.59
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.59.191+5.01
Meat share of dry matter21.4%0.096+2.06
Carb share of dry matter56.5%-0.115-6.50
Oil share of dry matter7.1%-0.092-0.65
Vegetable share of dry matter3.3%-0.005-0.02
Additive share of dry matter2.3%0.163+0.37
Supplement share of dry matter2.5%-0.012-0.03
Other share of dry matter1.6%-0.375-0.61
Unrecognised share of dry matter1.5%-0.027-0.04
Recipe graded poor5.0%-0.065-0.32
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient2.8%0.060+0.17
Undeclared quantities25.0%-0.106-2.64
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-2.660.222-0.59
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+2 transparency bonus
Subtotal
56.1
Final score
56/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v356/100current
v258/100
v157/100
v1.958/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein2123.2 (band 18 to 40%)84.2
Fat1011 (band 5.5 to 20%)93
Fibre2.93.2 (band 0.5 to 5%)100
Calcium1.21.3 (band 0.5 to 2.5%)94.8
Phosphorus0.91 (band 0.4 to 1.6%)99.7
Sodium0.30.3 (band 0.1+%)100
Calcium:phosphorus ratio1.31.3 (band 1 to 2%)90
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

Declared fortification: 16 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin A 13500 IE
  • Vitamin D3 1350 IE
  • Vitamin E 400 mg
  • Vitamin B1 11 mg
  • Vitamin B2 11 mg
  • Vitamin B6 7.3 mg
  • Vitamin B12 55 mcg
  • Biotin 350 mcg
  • Folsäure 2.5 mg
  • Niacin 45 mg
  • Calcium-D-Pantothenat 22 mg
  • Cholinchlorid 2000 mg
  • Kupfer 10 mg
  • Zink 77 mg
  • Jod 2.1 mg
  • Selen 0.22 mg

Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (75% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)15/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)10/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · strong — 3 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Getreidefreies Futter für empfindliche Hunde." — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Verwöhnen Sie Ihren kleinen Vierbeiner mit Dr.Clauder´s Mini Ente & Kartoffel Hyposensitive, dem idealen getreidefreien Trockenfutter für Hunde mit speziellen Ernährungsbedürfnissen." — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Alleinfuttermittel für ausgewachsene Hunde kleiner und sehr kleiner Rassen bis 7,5kg Endgewicht." — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.

10 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Strong: at least three checkable claims, all consistent with the declared label, and no compliance cap.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Getreidefreies Futter für empfindliche Hunde. (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Optimale Verdaulichkeit durch Chicorée-Ballaststoffe. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Omega 3 und 6 für gesunde Haut und glänzendes Fell. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Verwöhnen Sie Ihren kleinen Vierbeiner mit Dr.Clauder´s Mini Ente & Kartoffel Hyposensitive, dem idealen getreidefreien Trockenfutter für Hunde mit speziellen Ernährungsbedürfnissen. (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Die enthaltenen präbiotischen Ballaststoffe aus Chicorée fördern eine gesunde Verdauung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
während Omega-3 und Omega-6-Fettsäuren aus Fischöl die Haut- und Fellgesundheit unterstützen. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Dank des Verzichts auf Konservierungsmittel (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Nachhaltige Produktion in Deutschland (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
Alleinfuttermittel für ausgewachsene Hunde kleiner und sehr kleiner Rassen bis 7,5kg Endgewicht. (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
Made in Germany (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
vollwertige Ernährung für Ihren Hund (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ein Kilogramm dieses Trockenfutters entspricht dem Nährwert von 600g Frischfleisch (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Diese ausgewogene Rezeptur kombiniert nur eine tierische und eine pflanzliche Proteinquelle und bietet somit höchste Verträglichkeit. (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Mini Hyposensitive Ente & Kartoffel

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Dr. Clauder's

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.