Dibo Pur Pferd

Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label

Pur Pferd
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Dibo Pur Pferd a good dog food?

We score it 81/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

Complete wet food in chunks for dogs of all life stages, with meat and animal derivatives, horse and cooking broth as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Scores 83, in the top quarter of wet foods we track.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 89% of the dry matter (70% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 26% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 26.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 11% · Fat 6.60%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein11%
Fat6.60%
Fibre0.40%
Ash2%
Moisture75%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Bitte bewahren Sie unsere DIBO Nassfutterdosen an einem kühlen Ort auf, an dem sie vor direkter Sonneneinstrahlung geschützt sind.

Additives declared on the label

Nutritional additives

Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg; Vitamin E all rac-alfa-Tocopherolacetat 30 I.E./kg; Zink als Zinksulfat; Monohydrat 15 mg/kg; Mangan als Mangan-IIsulfat; Monohydrat 3 mg/kg; Jod als Calciumjodat; wasserfrei 0.75 mg/kg

Ingredients (4)3 of 4 percentages printed

Estimated composition

  • meat 70.0%
  • other 29.0%
  • supplement 1.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Meat and animal derivativesMeat and Animal Derivativesmeat · poor-0.0
270% HorseHorsemeat · good7070.0
3Broth (29%)Cooking brothother · medium2929.0
4Minerals (1%)Vitamins and mineralssupplement · medium11.0
  1. 1. Meat and animal derivatives0.0% estimated
  2. 2. 70% Horse70% declared70.0% estimated
    Horse · meat · good
  3. 3. Broth (29%)29% declared29.0% estimated
    Cooking broth · other · medium
  4. 4. Minerals (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
    Vitamins and minerals · supplement · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-08-22

Brand and contact: Dibo

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-08-22
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.dibo.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The product scored 81 out of 100. The meat content contributed +8.6 points and the overall quality of the ingredient list added +7 points. The remaining ingredients dragged the score down by -2.5 points. Being labelled nutritionally complete gave a boost of +2.3 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.00
Meat share of dry matter89.2%0.096+8.56
Supplement share of dry matter4.2%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter6.6%-0.375-2.47
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.00
Meat share of dry matter89.2%0.096+8.56
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter4.2%-0.012-0.05
Other share of dry matter6.6%-0.375-2.47
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksyes-0.672-0.67
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
81.0
Final score
81/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v381/100current
v283/100
v181/100
v1.983/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein1144 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat6.626.4 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.41.6 (band 0.5 to 5%)84.7

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
  • Vitamin D3 200 I.E./kg
  • Vitamin E all rac-alfa-Tocopherolacetat 30 I.E./kg
  • Zink als Zinksulfat
  • Monohydrat 15 mg/kg
  • Mangan als Mangan-IIsulfat
  • Monohydrat 3 mg/kg
  • Jod als Calciumjodat
  • wasserfrei 0.75 mg/kg

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
mit wertvollen Vitaminen und Nährstoffen (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
gute Alternative zum BARF Futter (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
gut für seine Verdauung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
besondere Verträglichkeit von Pferdefleisch (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
fettarme Ernährung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vielzahl an essentiellen Vitaminen, Mineralstoffen und Spurenelemente (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
singleproteinquelle (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Exklusives Fleisch für exklusive Hunde (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Reine Fleischdose mit dem Besten vom Pferd (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
feinste Zutaten ausschließlich vom Pferd (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
niedrigeren Fettgehalt als einige andere Fleischsorten (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
proteinreiche (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
umfassende Ernährung (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
die Gesundheit ihres Lieblings rundum unterstützen (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
ohne Konservierungsmittel (on pack)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Pur Pferd

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Dibo

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.