Our verdict
Is Chudleys Original a good dog food?
We score it 39/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Complete muesli-style dry food for adult dogs, with wheat, dehydrated poultry proteins and whole grains as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
86% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids lamb: the label lists lamb
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 20.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 20% · Fat 11.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 20% |
| Fat | 11.50% |
| Fibre | 2.80% |
| Ash | 5.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
lines Open tab Small (5-10kg) Medium (10-25kg) Large (25-45kg) Very Large (45kg+) 105-175g 175-350g 350-550g 550g+
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (26)86% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 25.7%
- veg 23.3%
- carb 20.6%
- oil 13.9%
- supplement 8.7%
- additive 4.2%
- fibre 3.7%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Flaked Whole Grain Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 4.5 |
| 2 | Poultry Meal (14%) | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | 14 | 14.0 |
| 3 | Flaked Whole Grain Maize | Whole Grains | carb · good | - | 4.4 |
| 4 | Whole Grain Wheat | Wheat | carb · poor | - | 4.3 |
| 5 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 4.3 |
| 6 | Glucose Syrup | Glucose Syrup | additive · poor | - | 4.2 |
| 7 | Rice Lamb Meal | Lamb | meat · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 8 | Hydrolysed Chicken | Hydrolysed Chicken | meat · medium | - | 4.0 |
| 9 | Flaked Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.9 |
| 10 | Wheatfeed | Wheat feed | carb · poor | - | 3.8 |
| 11 | Unmolassed Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 3.7 |
| 12 | Turkey Meal | Dehydrated turkey protein | meat · good | - | 3.6 |
| 13 | Prairie Meal | Prairie Meal | carb · medium | - | 3.5 |
| 14 | Alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 3.4 |
| 15 | Rapeseed Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 3.3 |
| 16 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 3.3 |
| 17 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 3.2 |
| 18 | Yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 3.1 |
| 19 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 3.0 |
| 20 | Full Fat Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 2.9 |
| 21 | Blackcurrant | Blackcurrant | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 22 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 2.7 |
| 23 | Pomegranate | Pomegranate | veg · good | - | 2.6 |
| 24 | Rosehips | Rose Hip | veg · good | - | 2.5 |
| 25 | Yucca Schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 26 | Beetroot | Beetroot | veg · good | - | 2.4 |
- 1. Flaked Whole Grain Wheat4.5% estimated
- 2. Poultry Meal (14%)14% declared14.0% estimated
- 3. Flaked Whole Grain Maize4.4% estimated
- 4. Whole Grain Wheat4.3% estimated
- 5. Chicken Fat4.3% estimated
- 6. Glucose Syrup4.2% estimated
- 7. Rice Lamb Meal4.1% estimated
- 8. Hydrolysed Chicken4.0% estimated
- 9. Flaked Peas3.9% estimated
- 10. Wheatfeed3.8% estimated
- 11. Unmolassed Beet Pulp3.7% estimated
- 12. Turkey Meal3.6% estimated
- 13. Prairie Meal3.5% estimated
- 14. Alfalfa3.4% estimated
- 15. Rapeseed Oil3.3% estimated
- 16. Salmon Oil3.3% estimated
- 17. Minerals3.2% estimated
- 18. Yeast3.1% estimated
- 19. Salmon Oil3.0% estimated
- 20. Full Fat Linseed2.9% estimated
- 21. Blackcurrant2.8% estimated
- 22. Rosemary2.7% estimated
- 23. Pomegranate2.6% estimated
- 24. Rosehips2.5% estimated
- 25. Yucca Schidigera2.4% estimated
- 26. Beetroot2.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Chudleys
- Website
- https://chudleys.com/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01953 882485
- Contact page
- chudleys.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- chudleys.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
We worked through the main factors behind this score of 39 out of 100. The processing format contributed -10.1 points, and ingredients without printed percentages contributed -9.1 points, pulling the score down. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +3.9 points, while the carbohydrate content contributed -2.7 points, weighing against it.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.90 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 16.9% | 0.096 | +1.62 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 23.9% | -0.115 | -2.75 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.0% | -0.092 | -1.65 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.9% | 0.163 | +0.80 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.8% | -0.065 | -1.09 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 86.0% | -0.106 | -9.08 |
| Additive penalty | -5.00 | 0.222 | -1.11 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.94 | 33.786 | +31.76 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | yes | -10.146 | -10.15 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.90 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 16.9% | 0.096 | +1.62 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 23.9% | -0.115 | -2.75 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 18.0% | -0.092 | -1.65 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 7.4% | -0.005 | -0.04 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.9% | 0.163 | +0.80 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.5% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 16.8% | -0.065 | -1.09 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 4 | -0.876 | -3.50 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.5% | 0.060 | +0.27 |
| Undeclared quantities | 86.0% | -0.106 | -9.08 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.00 | 0.222 | -1.11 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.94 | 33.786 | +31.76 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | yes | -10.146 | -10.15 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.64
- Subtotal
- 39.1
- Final score
- 39/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 20 | 21.1 (band 18 to 40%) | 78.4 |
| Fat | 11.5 | 12.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 97.4 |
| Fibre | 2.8 | 3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 5.2% from the food type.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (14% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 2.8/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| help support immunity, digestion, muscle recovery and coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Designed to help support regular low-level work loads (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Prebiotics to help support gut health and immune system (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and unique package of nutrients to support skin and coat condition (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Original
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.