Burns Pet Nutrition Weight Control Chicken & Oats Dry Dog Food
Dry Extruded · completeClear label
Our verdict
Is Burns Pet Nutrition Weight Control Chicken & Oats Dry Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 59/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with oats, rice and dried chicken protein as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oats
- You need more protein than this: 18.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 18.50% · Fat 7.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 18.50% |
| Fat | 7.50% |
| Fibre | 7.50% |
| Ash | 6.50% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.21% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 2.07% |
| Calcium | 1% |
| Phosphorus | 0.70% |
| Sodium | 0.17% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Use our Adult to Senior Feeding Guide to find the daily amount they need to stay on track.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 25,000IU; Vitamin D3 2,000IU; Vitamin E 100IU; Taurine 1,000mg; Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 12mg; Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1mg; Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 20mg; Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 50mg; Selenium (3b8.11, Selenised Yeast Inactivated) 0.2mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants (mixed tocopherols)
Ingredients (7)10% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 73.0%
- meat 17.0%
- veg 4.3%
- oil 3.2%
- supplement 2.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oats (55%) | Oats | carb · medium | 55 | 55.0 |
| 2 | Brown Rice (18%) | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | 18 | 18.0 |
| 3 | Dried Chicken (17%) | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | 17 | 17.0 |
| 4 | Peas | Peas | veg · good | - | 3.8 |
| 5 | Chicken Oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 3.2 |
| 6 | Seaweed (0.5%) | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 7 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 2.5 |
- 1. Oats (55%)55% declared55.0% estimated
- 2. Brown Rice (18%)18% declared18.0% estimated
- 3. Dried Chicken (17%)17% declared17.0% estimated
- 4. Peas3.8% estimated
- 5. Chicken Oil3.2% estimated
- 6. Seaweed (0.5%)0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 7. Minerals2.5% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: Burns Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://burnspet.co.uk/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 0800 083 6696
- Contact page
- burnspet.co.uk
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- burnspet.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 2,683 reviews
Facebook: - · 307 reviews
2,000 reviews on this product · 4.7/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This product scores 59 out of 100. The carbohydrate content contributed -8.6 points, while the processing format contributed -6.7 points. On the positive side, the overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.2 points and being labelled nutritionally complete contributed +2.3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.096 | +1.74 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 74.4% | -0.115 | -8.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.092 | -0.33 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Undeclared quantities | 9.5% | -0.106 | -1.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 18.1% | 0.096 | +1.74 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 74.4% | -0.115 | -8.56 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 3.6% | -0.092 | -0.33 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 1.2% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 2.7% | -0.012 | -0.03 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 9.5% | -0.106 | -1.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 58.6
- Final score
- 59/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.5 | 20.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 76.7 |
| Fat | 7.5 | 8.3 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 81.5 |
| Fibre | 7.5 | 8.3 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 96.4 |
| Calcium | 1 | 1.1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 88.1 |
| Phosphorus | 0.7 | 0.8 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 88.7 |
| Sodium | 0.17 | 0.2 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 95.7 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 25,000IU
- Vitamin D3 2,000IU
- Vitamin E 100IU
- Taurine 1,000mg
- Copper (Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 12mg
- Iodine (Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1mg
- Manganese (Manganese Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 20mg
- Zinc (Zinc Chelate of Amino Acid Hydrate) 50mg
- Selenium (3b8.11, Selenised Yeast Inactivated) 0.2mg
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (90.5% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 18.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "High in fibre and with controlled levels of protein and fat" — supported by the declared high fibre data.
1 further claim on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Naturally high in fibre and made with wholegrain oats it gives a steady release of energy which can help dogs to feel fuller for longer (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High in fibre and with controlled levels of protein and fat (on page) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Weight Control Chicken & Oats Dry Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.