Brit Care RABBIT SENIOR Complete

Dry Muesli complete

RABBIT SENIOR Complete
Poor
our rating

Is Brit Care RABBIT SENIOR Complete a good dog food?

We score it 39/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 39 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributes +5.3 to the total. However, the presence of ingredients without printed percentages deducts -13.1, while the processing format reduces the score by -10.7. Additionally, the carbohydrate content impacts the rating by -3.6.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.

Complete food for senior dogs, with alfalfa, nettles and dandelion root as the main ingredients.

Why you might choose it

  • Low in fat for its format: 3% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • Low in protein: 15% protein on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 0% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.
  • 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.

View the source page

Estimated composition

veg58.6%
supplement21.2%
carb20.3%

Typical analysis (as fed)

Protein
13.50%
Fat
2.80%
Fibre
19%
Ash
8.20%
Moisture
10%

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
  • You need more protein than this: 15.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.

Ingredients (15)

#As declaredMatchedCategoryTierDeclared %Est. %
1alfalfaAlfalfaveggood-8.7
2nettleNettlesveggood-8.4
3dandelionDandelion Rootveggood-8.1
4plantainPlantainveggood-7.8
5dried applesApplesveggood-7.5
6barleyBarleycarbmedium-7.2
7carrotCarrotsveggood-7.0
8cornMaize / Corncarbpoor-6.7
9wheatWheatcarbpoor-6.4
10linseedLinseedveggood-6.1
11brewer´s yeastBrewer's Yeastsupplementgood-5.8
12mannan-oligosaccharidesMannanoligosaccharidessupplementgood-5.5
13fructo-oligosaccharidesFructo-oligosaccharidessupplementgood-5.2
14milk thistleMilk Thistleveggood-4.9
15Yucca schidigera extractYucca Schidigerasupplementgood-4.6

Brand

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-08-22
Scored with
Model v2 (methodology)
Product page
brit-petfood.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.59.915+5.30
Carb share of dry matter31.8%-0.113-3.58
Vegetable share of dry matter33.6%-0.002-0.06
Supplement share of dry matter34.6%-0.009-0.31
Recipe graded poor13.0%-0.045-0.58
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient6.7%0.056+0.38
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Dry Muesliyes-10.711-10.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-32.336+32.34
Average ingredient quality0.59.915+5.30
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.116+0.00
Carb share of dry matter31.8%-0.113-3.58
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.088+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter33.6%-0.002-0.06
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.177+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter34.6%-0.009-0.31
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.371+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.022+0.00
Recipe graded poor13.0%-0.045-0.58
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.182+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.868-1.74
Largest single poor ingredient6.7%0.056+0.38
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.131-13.09
Prints ingredient percentagesno3.194+0.00
Complete dietyes1.703+1.70
Frozen or chilled freshno11.440+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no-0.506+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-1.988-1.99
High carb and low meatno-1.250+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.0-0.073+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.0-0.339+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.016.475+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.236+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0032.336+32.34
Processing: Rawno13.322+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno7.712+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno6.583+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno4.857+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno0.072+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno11.127+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno9.320+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno4.569+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-2.321+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.996+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.833+0.00
Processing: Dry Muesliyes-10.711-10.71
Processing: Wet Pateno2.935+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno2.292+0.00
Processing-type offset
-1.40
Subtotal
38.6
Final score
39/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v239/100current
v150/100
v1.953/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein13.515 (band 18 to 40%)58.3
Fat2.83.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)39.6
Fibre1921.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)0

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

No on-pack claims on file: nothing to verify.

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Other products from Brit Care

Alternatives to RABBIT SENIOR Complete

Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.

See all alternatives

Community

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.