Billy & Margot Oven Baked Biscuits with Banana

Treat · complementary

Oven Baked Biscuits with Banana
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Billy & Margot Oven Baked Biscuits with Banana a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary baked dry treats for adult dogs, with wheat, beef and beef fat as the main ingredients.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Single named animal protein: beef.
  • Low in fat for its format: 6% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 26% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 19% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Single named protein: beef
  • Doesn't list chicken, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
  • You need more protein than this: 19.0% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 14 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Beef): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 19% · Fat 6%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein19%
Fat6%

Energy: 310 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • veg 33.9%
  • carb 22.9%
  • additive 17.9%
  • meat 9.0%
  • oil 8.6%
  • fibre 7.6%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1WheatWheatcarb · poor-9.3
2Beef MealBeefmeat · medium-9.0
3Beef FatBeef Fatoil · medium-8.6
4Dried BananaBananaveg · good-8.3
5LinseedLinseedveg · good-8.0
6Cellulose FibreCellulose Fibrefibre · medium-7.6
7CarrotCarrotsveg · good-7.3
8Vegetable StarchLiquid Vegetable Starchcarb · medium-7.0
9Manuka HoneyHoneycarb · medium-6.6
10Natural PreservativePreservativesadditive · medium-6.3
11SaltSaltadditive · poor-6.0
12Natural AntioxidantAntioxidantsadditive · medium-5.6
13Chia SeedsChia Seedsveg · good-5.3
14KaleKaleveg · good-5.0
  1. 1. Wheat9.3% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  2. 2. Beef Meal9.0% estimated
    Beef · meat · medium
  3. 3. Beef Fat8.6% estimated
    Beef Fat · oil · medium
  4. 4. Dried Banana8.3% estimated
    Banana · veg · good
  5. 5. Linseed8.0% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  6. 6. Cellulose Fibre7.6% estimated
    Cellulose Fibre · fibre · medium
  7. 7. Carrot7.3% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  8. 8. Vegetable Starch7.0% estimated
    Liquid Vegetable Starch · carb · medium
  9. 9. Manuka Honey6.6% estimated
    Honey · carb · medium
  10. 10. Natural Preservative6.3% estimated
    Preservatives · additive · medium
  11. 11. Salt6.0% estimated
    Salt · additive · poor
  12. 12. Natural Antioxidant5.6% estimated
    Antioxidants · additive · medium
  13. 13. Chia Seeds5.3% estimated
    Chia Seeds · veg · good
  14. 14. Kale5.0% estimated
    Kale · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-02

Brand and contact: Billy & Margot

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-02

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.49.191+3.50
Carb share of dry matter24.8%-0.115-2.86
Oil share of dry matter10.5%-0.092-0.97
Vegetable share of dry matter26.2%-0.005-0.14
Additive share of dry matter19.9%0.163+3.24
Recipe graded poor15.3%-0.065-0.99
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient9.3%0.060+0.56
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-21.770.222-4.83
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.49.191+3.50
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter24.8%-0.115-2.86
Oil share of dry matter10.5%-0.092-0.97
Vegetable share of dry matter26.2%-0.005-0.14
Additive share of dry matter19.9%0.163+3.24
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.012+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor15.3%-0.065-0.99
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients2-0.876-1.75
Largest single poor ingredient9.3%0.060+0.56
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-21.770.222-4.83
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Subtotal
39.4
Final score
39/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v339/100current
v242/100
v142/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✗ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) - not on file0/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "completely grain-free" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.

6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Made in Australia (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
completely grain-free (on page)Free-fromcontradictedManufacturer assertion
Crude Protein min 19% (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% NATURAL TREATS (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
This product is formulated to meet the nutritional levels established by AAFCO Dog Food Nutrient Profiles for adult maintenance. (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Crude Fat min 6% (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Packed with quality protein as well as superfoods and holistic ingredients (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Billy & Margot

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.