Bentleys Digestive Care Supplement Chews for Dogs
Supplement · complementary
Our verdict
Is Bentleys Digestive Care Supplement Chews for Dogs a good dog food?
This is a supplement, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a supplement should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
Complementary extruded dry supplement for dogs of all life stages, with brewer's yeast, glycerine and potatoes as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- You need more protein than this: 19.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
What the label declares
Active ingredients and quantities as printed by the manufacturer. We record them as stated; we do not assess whether they are effective. Supplements are not scored.
| Active | Declared amount | Basis |
|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | 4,167 mg/kg | per kg |
Nutrition and feedingProtein 15.50% · Fat 12.40%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 15.50% |
| Fat | 12.40% |
| Fibre | 2.40% |
| Ash | 4.90% |
| Moisture | 21.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Follow feeding guidelines on the packaging for your size dog.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Fructooligosacharides (FOS) 16667 mg/kg; Enterococcus faecium (E1707) 4167 mg/kg
Technological additives
Preservatives
Ingredients (7)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 37.7%
- supplement 18.2%
- other 16.9%
- veg 14.3%
- oil 13.0%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brewer's Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 18.2 |
| 2 | Glycerine | Glycerine | other · medium | - | 16.9 |
| 3 | Potato Flake | Potatoes | carb · medium | - | 15.6 |
| 4 | Full Fat Linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 14.3 |
| 5 | Rape Seed Oil | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | - | 13.0 |
| 6 | Maltodextrin | Maltodextrin | carb · poor | - | 11.7 |
| 7 | Tapioca | Tapioca | carb · medium | - | 10.4 |
- 1. Brewer's Yeast18.2% estimated
- 2. Glycerine16.9% estimated
- 3. Potato Flake15.6% estimated
- 4. Full Fat Linseed14.3% estimated
- 5. Rape Seed Oil13.0% estimated
- 6. Maltodextrin11.7% estimated
- 7. Tapioca10.4% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-06
Brand and contact: Bentleys
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-06
- Product page
- bentleysdogfood.co.uk
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.20 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.115 | -2.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.092 | -1.75 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Other share of dry matter | 12.5% | -0.375 | -4.67 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.7% | -0.065 | -0.76 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.7% | 0.060 | +0.70 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.8 | 9.191 | +7.20 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.115 | -2.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.092 | -1.75 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 19.0% | -0.005 | -0.10 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 24.7% | -0.012 | -0.30 |
| Other share of dry matter | 12.5% | -0.375 | -4.67 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 11.7% | -0.065 | -0.76 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 11.7% | 0.060 | +0.70 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 42.2
- Final score
- 42/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Combines Probiotics (EU approved for canine use) and Prebiotics (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Helps reduce wind (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Supports healthy digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Boosts beneficial bacteria as well as reduces bad bacteria (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Improves general health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Firmer stools (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Proven to support digestive health (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Veterinary strength (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Veterinarian formulated (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.