veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Belcando Vetline Weight Control
Dry Extruded · completeveterinary dietHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Belcando Vetline Weight Control a good dog food?
We score it 60/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dehydrated poultry proteins, amaranth and pea flour as the main ingredients.
47% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists oat flour
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 32% · Fat 8%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 32% |
| Fat | 8% |
| Fibre | 7% |
| Ash | 6.90% |
| Moisture | 10% |
| Carbohydrates | 34.10% |
Energy: 314 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Simply feed dry. Fresh drinking water should be available at all times.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 15,000 IU/kg; Vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg; Vitamin E 150 mg/kg; L-carnitine 325 mg/kg; Copper (as copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate) 12.5 mg/kg; Iron (as iron(II) sulphate monohydrate) 200 mg/kg; Manganese (as manganese (II) oxide) 40 mg/kg; Zinc (as zinc oxide) 125 mg/kg; Iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2 mg/kg; Selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.05 mg/kg
Technological additives
Tocopherol extracts from vegetable oils 48 mg/kg
Ingredients (26)47% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 36.9%
- carb 24.1%
- supplement 15.6%
- fibre 14.6%
- additive 4.5%
- veg 2.7%
- oil 1.5%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poultry protein (31%) | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | 31 | 31.0 |
| 2 | Amaranth | Amaranth | carb · good | - | 6.8 |
| 3 | Pea flour | Pea flour | carb · medium | - | 6.4 |
| 4 | Fodder oat flour (6%) | Oat Flour | carb · medium | 6 | 6.0 |
| 5 | Oat husk meal (5%) | Oat Husk Meal | carb · poor | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | Apple pomace (3%) | Apple Fibre | fibre · medium | 3 | 3.0 |
| 7 | Linseed (2.5%) | Linseed | veg · good | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 8 | Pea fibre | Pea Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 9 | Kibbled carob | Carob | fibre · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 10 | Brewers’ yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 5.3 |
| 11 | inactivated (2.5%) | Inactivated Lactobacillus helveticus | supplement · good | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 12 | Poultry liver | Chicken Liver | meat · good | - | 4.9 |
| 13 | Poultry fat (1.5%) | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | 1.5 | 1.5 |
| 14 | Marine zooplankton (Krill) (1%) | Krill | meat · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 15 | Sodium chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | Potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.1 |
| 17 | 0.02% Nettle leaves | Nettles | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 18 | 0.02% Gentian root | Dried Gentian Root | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 19 | 0.02% Centaury | Dried Centaury | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 20 | 0.02% Chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 21 | 0.02% Fennel | Fennel | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 22 | 0.02% Caraway | Caraway | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 23 | 0.02% Mistletoe | Mistletoe | veg · medium | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 24 | 0.02% Yarrow | Yarrow | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 25 | 0.02% Blackberry leaves | Blackberry Leaves | veg · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 26 | Yucca schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 3.8 |
- 1. Poultry protein (31%)31% declared31.0% estimated
- 2. Amaranth6.8% estimated
- 3. Pea flour6.4% estimated
- 4. Fodder oat flour (6%)6% declared6.0% estimated
- 5. Oat husk meal (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. Apple pomace (3%)3% declared3.0% estimated
- 7. Linseed (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 8. Pea fibre6.0% estimated
- 9. Kibbled carob5.6% estimated
- 10. Brewers’ yeast5.3% estimated
- 11. inactivated (2.5%)2.5% declared2.5% estimated
- 12. Poultry liver4.9% estimated
- 13. Poultry fat (1.5%)1.5% declared1.5% estimated
- 14. Marine zooplankton (Krill) (1%)1% declared1.0% estimated
- 15. Sodium chloride4.5% estimated
- 16. Potassium chloride4.1% estimated
- 17. 0.02% Nettle leaves0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 18. 0.02% Gentian root0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 19. 0.02% Centaury0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 20. 0.02% Chamomile0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 21. 0.02% Fennel0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 22. 0.02% Caraway0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 23. 0.02% Mistletoe0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 24. 0.02% Yarrow0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 25. 0.02% Blackberry leaves0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 26. Yucca schidigera3.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09
Brand and contact: Belcando
- Website
- https://www.belcando.com/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.belcando.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
3 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product reached an overall score of 60 out of 100. The processing format pulled the score down by -6.7 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.2. Ingredients without printed percentages cost another -5 points, and the meat content contributed +3.2 points in the other direction. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.0% | 0.096 | +3.17 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.115 | -2.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.092 | -0.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.6% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.7% | 0.163 | +0.76 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.5% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.5% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.0% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 47.3% | -0.106 | -5.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Additive penalty | -5.50 | 0.222 | -1.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.22 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 33.0% | 0.096 | +3.17 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 24.8% | -0.115 | -2.85 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 1.7% | -0.092 | -0.16 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 2.6% | -0.005 | -0.01 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 4.7% | 0.163 | +0.76 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 16.5% | -0.012 | -0.20 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.5% | -0.065 | -0.62 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 5.0% | 0.060 | +0.30 |
| Undeclared quantities | 47.3% | -0.106 | -5.00 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.50 | 0.222 | -1.22 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 60.0
- Final score
- 60/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 32 | 35.6 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 8 | 8.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 84 |
| Fibre | 7 | 7.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 314 | 348.9 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 10 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 15,000 IU/kg
- Vitamin D3 1,500 IU/kg
- Vitamin E 150 mg/kg
- L-carnitine 325 mg/kg
- Copper (as copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate) 12.5 mg/kg
- Iron (as iron(II) sulphate monohydrate) 200 mg/kg
- Manganese (as manganese (II) oxide) 40 mg/kg
- Zinc (as zinc oxide) 125 mg/kg
- Iodine (as calcium iodate anhydrous) 2 mg/kg
- Selenium (as sodium selenite) 0.05 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (52.7% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 10.5/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
0/100 · limited — 1 checkable claim: 0 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "Gluten-free alternative to grain" — the declared label says otherwise on grain-free.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gluten-free alternative to grain (on page) | Free-from | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.