AVA Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Weight Management Adult Dog Food
Dry Extruded · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is AVA Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Weight Management Adult Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 63/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dried chicken protein, chicken and rice as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 27% · Fat 6.80%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 27% |
| Fat | 6.80% |
| Fibre | 6% |
| Ash | 8.50% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.22% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1.10% |
| Calcium | 1.70% |
| Phosphorus | 1.10% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Store in a cool dry place. Once opened, reseal to maintain freshness. For best before date and batch code see top of pack.
Feeding guide
Feeding guide provided by dog weight (2kg-60kg+) with separate daily amounts for weight loss and weight management. Recommend feeding in 2 equal meals at regular times. Introduce over 4-7 days when transitioning.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 24,000 IU; Vitamin D3 1,200 IU; Vitamin E 400 mg; L-carnitine 200 mg; Zinc (as Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 64.2 mg; Manganese (as Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 7.8 mg; Copper (as Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 8 mg; Iodine (as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.27 mg; Selenium (as Organic form of Selenium produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3060 (Selenised Yeast Inactivated)) 0.16 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants; Rosemary Extract (Sensory Additive)
Ingredients (22)16% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 44.6%
- meat 37.0%
- fibre 8.8%
- supplement 4.9%
- veg 2.8%
- oil 1.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal 26.5% | Dried chicken protein | meat · good | 26.5 | 26.5 |
| 2 | Fresh Chicken 5% | Chicken | meat · medium | 5 | 5.0 |
| 3 | Chicken Gravy 3.5% | Chicken | meat · medium | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| 4 | Brown Rice (25%) | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb · medium | 25 | 25.0 |
| 5 | Whole Oats (17%) | Oat Groats | carb · good | 17 | 17.0 |
| 6 | Beet Pulp (7%) | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | 7 | 7.0 |
| 7 | Dried Alfalfa | Alfalfa | veg · good | - | 2.8 |
| 8 | Pea Starch | Pea Starch | carb · poor | - | 2.6 |
| 9 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 2.4 |
| 10 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement · medium | - | 2.2 |
| 11 | Whole Dried Egg | Dried Egg | meat · medium | - | 2.0 |
| 12 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 1.8 |
| 13 | Pea Fibre | Pea Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 1.6 |
| 14 | Chicory Root Extract (as a source of Pre-biotic Fructooligosaccharide) (0.16%) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre · good | 0.16 | 0.2 |
| 15 | Glucosamine (0.06%) | Glucosamine | supplement · good | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 16 | Chondroitin (0.045%) | Chondroitin | supplement · good | 0.045 | 0.04 |
| 17 | 0.06% as a source of Beta-glucans | Beta-Glucans | supplement · good | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 18 | 0.06% Pre-biotic Mannanoligosaccharides | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.06 | 0.06 |
| 19 | Yucca Extract (0.02%) | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | 0.02 | 0.02 |
| 20 | Cranberry Extract (0.01%) | Cranberry Extract | supplement · good | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| 21 | Pomegranate Extract (0.005%) | Pomegranate | veg · good | 0.005 | 0.01 |
| 22 | Green Tea Extract (0.005%) | Green Tea | veg · good | 0.005 | 0.01 |
- 1. Chicken Meal 26.5%26.5% declared26.5% estimated
- 2. Fresh Chicken 5%5% declared5.0% estimated
- 3. Chicken Gravy 3.5%3.5% declared3.5% estimated
- 4. Brown Rice (25%)25% declared25.0% estimated
- 5. Whole Oats (17%)17% declared17.0% estimated
- 6. Beet Pulp (7%)7% declared7.0% estimated
- 7. Dried Alfalfa2.8% estimated
- 8. Pea Starch2.6% estimated
- 9. Brewers Yeast2.4% estimated
- 10. Minerals2.2% estimated
- 11. Whole Dried Egg2.0% estimated
- 12. Salmon Oil1.8% estimated
- 13. Pea Fibre1.6% estimated
- 14. Chicory Root Extract (as a source of Pre-biotic Fructooligosaccharide) (0.16%)0.16% declared0.2% estimated
- 15. Glucosamine (0.06%)0.06% declared0.06% estimated
- 16. Chondroitin (0.045%)0.045% declared0.04% estimated
- 17. 0.06% as a source of Beta-glucans0.06% declared0.06% estimated
- 18. 0.06% Pre-biotic Mannanoligosaccharides0.06% declared0.06% estimated
- 19. Yucca Extract (0.02%)0.02% declared0.02% estimated
- 20. Cranberry Extract (0.01%)0.01% declared0.01% estimated
- 21. Pomegranate Extract (0.005%)0.005% declared0.01% estimated
- 22. Green Tea Extract (0.005%)0.005% declared0.01% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14
Brand and contact: AVA
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petsathome.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
11 reviews on this product · 4.9/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves a total score of 63 out of 100 based on several key factors. The processing format contributed -6.7 points, and the carbohydrate content contributed -5.4 points. Conversely, the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.7 points, and the meat content contributed +3 points to the overall assessment.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.73 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 31.0% | 0.096 | +2.98 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.8% | -0.115 | -5.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.0% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.6% | -0.065 | -0.17 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 15.6% | -0.106 | -1.64 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.73 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 31.0% | 0.096 | +2.98 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 46.8% | -0.115 | -5.38 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.1% | -0.092 | -0.20 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 3.0% | -0.005 | -0.02 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 2.6% | -0.065 | -0.17 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 2.6% | 0.060 | +0.16 |
| Undeclared quantities | 15.6% | -0.106 | -1.64 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 62.8
- Final score
- 63/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 27 | 29.3 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 6.8 | 7.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 77.8 |
| Fibre | 6 | 6.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.7 | 1.8 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 1.1 | 1.2 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.5 | 1.5 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 63.4 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 63.4). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 9 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin A 24,000 IU
- Vitamin D3 1,200 IU
- Vitamin E 400 mg
- L-carnitine 200 mg
- Zinc (as Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 64.2 mg
- Manganese (as Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 7.8 mg
- Copper (as Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 8 mg
- Iodine (as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.27 mg
- Selenium (as Organic form of Selenium produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3060 (Selenised Yeast Inactivated)) 0.16 mg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (84.4% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16.9/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Low Fat" — supported by the declared low fat data.
13 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobility & Joint care (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| High quality source of easily digestible protein (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Veterinary Approved (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low Fat (on pack) | High/low level | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hypoallergenic recipe (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added L-carnitine (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A rich source of omega 3 and 6 helps support skin and coat condition, heart and kidney health and ongoing brain function development (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains MOS and FOS pre-biotics to maintain internal body health and functional conditioning and Yucca to reduce stool odour (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added Glucosamine and Chondroitin helps support joint condition and general mobility (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Optimised ratios of Calcium and Phosphorus help maintain strong teeth and bones and maintain overall oral health (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added Taurine to support heart muscle condition (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| +Imuvita supports immunity (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains 50% less fat compared to AVA Medium Breed Adult Optimum Health Chicken recipe (on pack) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| With no added wheat or wheat gluten (on pack) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Weight Management Adult Dog Food
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.