AVA Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Labrador Retriever Dry Dog Food
Dry Extruded complete High meat Clear label Full label
Is AVA Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Labrador Retriever Dry Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 65/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 65 out of 100. Positive contributions come from the meat content, which adds +4 points, and the overall quality of the ingredient list, which contributes +4.4 points. However, the score is reduced by the processing format, contributing -7 points, and the carbohydrate content, which adds -5.4 points.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
- Recipe65
- Nutritionallow98
- Transparency60
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dried chicken protein, chicken and rice as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- Meat makes up an estimated 34% of the dry matter (45% as fed).
- Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
- Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.
Why you might not
We found no significant drawbacks in the data we hold for this product.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 25%
- Fat
- 13%
- Fibre
- 3.50%
- Ash
- 10%
- Omega-3 fatty acids
- 0.90%
- Omega-6 fatty acids
- 1.90%
- Calcium
- 1.40%
- Phosphorus
- 0.90%
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Vitamin A 56,000 IU; Vitamin D3 1,000 IU; Vitamin E 750 mg; Taurine 750 mg; L-Carnitine 300 mg; Zinc (as Zinc Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 100 mg; Copper (as Copper (II) Chelate of Amino Acids Hydrate) 10 mg; Manganese (as Manganese Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates) 25 mg; Iodine (as Calcium Iodate Anhydrous) 1.59 mg; Iron (as Iron Chelate of Protein Hydrolysates); Selenium (as Organic form of Selenium produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae CNCM I-3060 (Selenised yeast inactivated)) 0.2 mg
Technological additives
Antioxidants
Storage
Not explicitly stated beyond warnings; fresh clean water should always be available.
Feeding guide
Daily feed (g): 20-25kg 260-310g; 25-30kg 310-355g; 30-40kg 355-440g; 40-50kg 440-515g. Divide into 2 equal meals. Suitable for adult Labrador Retrievers from 15 months old.
Reviews
7 reviews on this product · 4.3/5
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dried chicken protein
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - brown / whole grain
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (22)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chicken Meal (21.0%) | Dried chicken protein | meat | good | 21 | 21.0 |
| 2 | Chicken (18.8%) | Chicken | meat | medium | 18.8 | 18.8 |
| 3 | Brown Rice (18.8%) | Rice - brown / whole grain | carb | medium | 18.8 | 18.8 |
| 4 | Maize (9.2%) | Maize / Corn | carb | poor | 9.2 | 9.2 |
| 5 | Beet Pulp (6.8%) | Beet Pulp | fibre | medium | 6.8 | 6.8 |
| 6 | Flaked Oats (6.4%) | Oats | carb | medium | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 7 | Sorghum (6.4%) | Sorghum | carb | medium | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 8 | Chicken Fat (3.0%) | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | 3 | 3.0 |
| 9 | Salmon Oil | Salmon Oil | oil | good | - | 1.7 |
| 10 | Brewers Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement | good | - | 1.5 |
| 11 | Chicken Gravy (2.2%) | Chicken | meat | medium | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 12 | Minerals | Vitamins and minerals | supplement | medium | - | 1.4 |
| 13 | Egg | Egg | meat | good | - | 1.2 |
| 14 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement | medium | - | 1.0 |
| 15 | Chicory Root Extract (0.2%) | Chicory Root Extract | fibre | good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 16 | Yeasts (0.14%) | Yeast | supplement | good | 0.14 | 0.1 |
| 17 | Glucosamine (0.07%) | Glucosamine | supplement | good | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| 18 | Chondroitin Sulphate (0.055%) | Chondroitin | supplement | good | 0.055 | 0.06 |
| 19 | Yucca Extract (0.025%) | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | 0.025 | 0.03 |
| 20 | Cranberry Extract (0.018%) | Cranberry Extract | supplement | good | 0.018 | 0.02 |
| 21 | Pomegranate Extract (0.009%) | Pomegranate Extract | supplement | good | 0.009 | 0.01 |
| 22 | Green Tea Extract (0.009%) | Green Tea | veg | good | 0.009 | 0.01 |
Brand
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.petsathome.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.915 | +4.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 34.3% | 0.116 | +3.98 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 48.1% | -0.113 | -5.41 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.088 | -0.49 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.009 | -0.04 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.2% | -0.045 | -0.41 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.2% | 0.056 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 4.7% | -0.131 | -0.61 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 34.3 | -0.073 | -2.51 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.915 | +4.38 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 34.3% | 0.116 | +3.98 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 48.1% | -0.113 | -5.41 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 5.5% | -0.088 | -0.49 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.002 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 3.9% | -0.009 | -0.04 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 9.2% | -0.045 | -0.41 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 9.2% | 0.056 | +0.52 |
| Undeclared quantities | 4.7% | -0.131 | -0.61 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | yes | 3.194 | +3.19 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | -0.506 | -0.51 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 34.3 | -0.073 | -2.51 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.236 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Nearly all quantities printed on label
- +2 full-disclosure bonus
- Subtotal
- 64.6
- Final score
- 65/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
| Model | Score | |
|---|---|---|
| v2 | 65/100 | current |
| v1 | 65/100 | |
| v1.9 | 67/100 |
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 25 | 27.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 95 |
| Fat | 13 | 14.1 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 3.5 | 3.8 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 1.4 | 1.5 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 100 |
| Phosphorus | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 98.9 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 7 declared nutrients (combined weight 90); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (95.3% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 19.1/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) | 5/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Hypoallergenic chicken recipe aids digestion, supports skin, coat, and general health (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natural source of omega 3 and 6 helps support skin and coat condition, heart and kidney health and ongoing brain function development (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added L-carnitine to help promote a healthy weight and maintain lean muscle mass (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Added Taurine to help support heart muscle condition (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Optimised ratios of Calcium and Phosphorus help maintain strong teeth and bones (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Veterinary Approved (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| With no added grain, wheat, wheat gluten, beef, pork, and soya (on page) | Free-from | Manufacturer assertion |
| Contains MOS and FOS prebiotics to help support the growth of healthy gut bacteria (on page) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from AVA
Alternatives to Veterinary Approved Optimum Health Labrador Retriever Dry Dog Food
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.