veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Animonda INTEGRA PROTECT Intestinal
Dry Extruded · completeveterinary diet
Our verdict
Is Animonda INTEGRA PROTECT Intestinal a good dog food?
We score it 47/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with maize, dehydrated poultry proteins and rice as the main ingredients.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids beef: it is listed as an ingredient
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists salmon oil
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists maize / corn
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 26.50% · Fat 13.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 26.50% |
| Fat | 13.50% |
| Fibre | 2.50% |
| Ash | 6% |
| Moisture | 8% |
| Sodium | 0.50% |
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Weight of the dog 2 - 5 kg: 40 - 85 g per day; 6 - 15 kg: 95 - 190 g per day; 16 - 25 kg: 200 - 280 g per day; 26 - 60 kg: 290 - 540 g per day
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
15000 IE Vitamin A; 1500 IE Vitamin D3; 1.8 mg Copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate; 24 mg Zinc oxide; 2.4 mg Manganese oxide; 0.64 mg Calcium iodate
Ingredients (17)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- supplement 24.4%
- meat 21.3%
- oil 18.3%
- carb 14.9%
- fibre 10.9%
- veg 5.4%
- additive 4.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corn | Maize / Corn | carb · medium | - | 7.7 |
| 2 | dried poultry protein | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat · good | - | 7.5 |
| 3 | rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 7.2 |
| 4 | hydrolysed poultry protein | Hydrolysed Poultry Protein | meat · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 5 | whole eggs poultry liver | Liver | meat · good | - | 6.8 |
| 6 | yeast | Yeast | supplement · good | - | 6.6 |
| 7 | poultry fat | Poultry Fat | oil · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 8 | beef tallow | Tallow | oil · medium | - | 6.1 |
| 9 | salmon oil | Salmon Oil | oil · good | - | 5.9 |
| 10 | beet pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 5.7 |
| 11 | linseed | Linseed | veg · good | - | 5.4 |
| 12 | oat fiber | Crude Fibre | fibre · medium | - | 5.2 |
| 13 | fructooligosaccharides | Fructo-oligosaccharides | supplement · good | - | 5.0 |
| 14 | sodium chloride | Salt | additive · poor | - | 4.8 |
| 15 | potassium chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 4.5 |
| 16 | calcium carbonate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 4.3 |
| 17 | yucca schidigera | Yucca Schidigera | supplement · good | - | 4.1 |
- 1. Corn7.7% estimated
- 2. dried poultry protein7.5% estimated
- 3. rice7.2% estimated
- 4. hydrolysed poultry protein7.0% estimated
- 5. whole eggs poultry liver6.8% estimated
- 6. yeast6.6% estimated
- 7. poultry fat6.3% estimated
- 8. beef tallow6.1% estimated
- 9. salmon oil5.9% estimated
- 10. beet pulp5.7% estimated
- 11. linseed5.4% estimated
- 12. oat fiber5.2% estimated
- 13. fructooligosaccharides5.0% estimated
- 14. sodium chloride4.8% estimated
- 15. potassium chloride4.5% estimated
- 16. calcium carbonate4.3% estimated
- 17. yucca schidigera4.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-09
Brand and contact: Animonda
- Website
- https://animonda.de/en/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-09
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- animonda.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The overall score is 47 out of 100. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -10.6 points, and the processing format contributed -6.7 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.6 points, with being labelled nutritionally complete adding +2.3. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.60 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.7% | -0.092 | -2.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 5.1% | 0.163 | +0.83 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 26.9% | -0.012 | -0.33 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.31 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -5.80 | 0.222 | -1.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.60 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 15.7% | -0.115 | -1.81 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 21.7% | -0.092 | -2.00 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 5.9% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 5.1% | 0.163 | +0.83 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 26.9% | -0.012 | -0.33 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 4.8% | -0.065 | -0.31 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 4.8% | 0.060 | +0.29 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -5.80 | 0.222 | -1.29 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 47.0
- Final score
- 47/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 26.5 | 28.8 (band 18 to 40%) | 99.5 |
| Fat | 13.5 | 14.7 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 2.5 | 2.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 99.6 |
| Sodium | 0.5 | 0.5 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 55); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
Declared fortification: 6 nutritional additives on the label
- 15000 IE Vitamin A
- 1500 IE Vitamin D3
- 1.8 mg Copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate
- 24 mg Zinc oxide
- 2.4 mg Manganese oxide
- 0.64 mg Calcium iodate
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file | 0/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| for use in cases of acute diarrhoea (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| no gluten (on page) | Free-from | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| increased sodium and potassium content (on page) | High/low level | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| highly digestible poultry protein (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.