AniForte Digestion Snack

Treat · complementaryClear labelFull label

Digestion Snack
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is AniForte Digestion Snack a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

Complementary extruded dry treats for dogs of all life stages, with chicken, fennel and lemon balm as the main ingredients.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.
  • Single named animal protein: chicken.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • High in fat: 39% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Single named protein: chicken
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • You are limiting fat: 38.7% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 13 ingredients.
  • Uses generic terms (Chicken): the specific animal source is not stated.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints quantities for 10 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 31.20% · Fat 37.70%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein31.20%
Fat37.70%
Fibre4%
Ash4.10%
Moisture2.70%

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Storage

Note: Store in a cool, dry place and protect from light.

Additives declared on the label

Technological additives

Bentonite 10000 mg

Ingredients (13)10 of 13 percentages printed

Estimated composition

  • fibre 56.7%
  • meat 39.1%
  • veg 2.1%
  • other 1.5%
  • supplement 0.5%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
177.33 % chickenChickenmeat · medium77.3377.3
21.06% fennelFennelveg · good1.061.1
31.06% lemon balmLemon Balmveg · good1.061.1
41.06% chamomileChamomileveg · good1.061.1
51.06% cuminCuminveg · good1.061.1
61.06% liquorice rootLicorice Rootsupplement · medium1.061.1
73.0% natural moor mud powderMoorother · medium33.0
82.0% psyllium husksPsylliumfibre · good22.0
9rose hipRose Hipveg · good-0.0
10apple fibre (60%)Apple Fibrefibre · medium6060.0
11Jerusalem artichoke (50%)Jerusalem Artichoke Powderfibre · good5050.0
12cellulose fibreCellulose Fibrefibre · medium-0.0
13vegetable glycerinGlycerineother · medium-0.0
  1. 1. 77.33 % chicken77.33% declared77.3% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  2. 2. 1.06% fennel1.06% declared1.1% estimated
    Fennel · veg · good
  3. 3. 1.06% lemon balm1.06% declared1.1% estimated
    Lemon Balm · veg · good
  4. 4. 1.06% chamomile1.06% declared1.1% estimated
    Chamomile · veg · good
  5. 5. 1.06% cumin1.06% declared1.1% estimated
    Cumin · veg · good
  6. 6. 1.06% liquorice root1.06% declared1.1% estimated
    Licorice Root · supplement · medium
  7. 7. 3.0% natural moor mud powder3% declared3.0% estimated
    Moor · other · medium
  8. 8. 2.0% psyllium husks2% declared2.0% estimated
    Psyllium · fibre · good
  9. 9. rose hip0.0% estimated
    Rose Hip · veg · good
  10. 10. apple fibre (60%)60% declared60.0% estimated
    Apple Fibre · fibre · medium
  11. 11. Jerusalem artichoke (50%)50% declared50.0% estimated
  12. 12. cellulose fibre0.0% estimated
    Cellulose Fibre · fibre · medium
  13. 13. vegetable glycerin0.0% estimated
    Glycerine · other · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-14

Brand and contact: AniForte

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-14
Product page
www.aniforte.co.uk

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.5/5 · 2,487 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.67
Meat share of dry matter17.2%0.096+1.66
Supplement share of dry matter0.8%-0.012-0.01
Other share of dry matter1.2%-0.375-0.45
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.69.191+5.67
Meat share of dry matter17.2%0.096+1.66
Carb share of dry matter0.0%-0.115+0.00
Oil share of dry matter0.0%-0.092+0.00
Vegetable share of dry matter0.5%-0.005-0.00
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.8%-0.012-0.01
Other share of dry matter1.2%-0.375-0.45
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
65.2
Final score
65/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Score history across model versions

The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.

ModelScore
v365/100current
v270/100
v169/100
v1.969/100
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

100/100 · moderate — 2 checkable claims: 2 consistent, 0 contradicted.

Consistent with the label

  • "Monoprotein, high meat content – without grains" — supported by the declared single protein data.
  • "Without grains - for better digestibility" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Contains pre and probiotics to help harmonise the gut (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports digestion and faecal consistency (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
With pre and probiotics for healthy intestinal flora (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Supports digestion and stool consistency (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Monoprotein, high meat content – without grains (on page)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
100% natural functional snacks made with chicken (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
High meat content (on page)High/low levelnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Without grains - for better digestibility (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
free from sugar, artificial flavours, colours or preservatives and without any synthetic vitamins (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from AniForte

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.