Advance Puppy Medium Breed Chicken with Rice

Dry Extruded · complete

Puppy Medium Breed Chicken with Rice
Poor
our rating

Our verdict

Is Advance Puppy Medium Breed Chicken with Rice a good dog food?

We score it 40/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".

How we score

90% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • High in protein: 34% protein on a dry-matter basis.
  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
  • Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.

Why you might not

  • 3 poor-graded ingredients make up about 23% of the recipe.
  • High in fat: 23% fat on a dry-matter basis.
  • Meat makes up an estimated 9% of the dry matter; carbohydrates dominate.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for puppies
  • Labelling or feeding guide is aimed at medium dogs
  • Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists fish oil
  • Your dog avoids duck: it is listed as an ingredient
  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 23.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 31% · Fat 21%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein31%
Fat21%
Fibre1.30%
Ash7%
Moisture9.70%
Carbohydrates30.90%
Omega-3 fatty acids0.13%
Omega-6 fatty acids2.30%

Energy: 395 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Technological additives

Antioxidants

Ingredients (16)90% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • carb 27.0%
  • oil 20.4%
  • additive 18.7%
  • fibre 13.2%
  • supplement 11.8%
  • meat 9.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Poultry MealDehydrated Poultry Proteinsmeat · good-3.4
2Chicken (53%)Chickenmeat · medium5353.0
3Turkey &/or DuckTurkeymeat · medium-3.3
4Rice (10%)Rice - whitecarb · medium1010.0
5Maize ProteinMaize glutencarb · poor-3.2
6SorghumSorghumcarb · medium-3.1
7Chicken FatChicken Oil and Fatoil · good-3.0
8Natural Flavour (Chicken)Smoked Flavouradditive · poor-2.8
9Dried Beet PulpBeet Pulpfibre · medium-2.7
10Sunflower OilSunflower oiloil · good-2.6
11Vitamins & MineralsVitaminsupplement · good-2.5
12SaltSaltadditive · poor-2.3
13InulinInulinfibre · good-2.2
14Fish OilFish Oiloil · good-2.1
15ColostrumColostrumsupplement · medium-2.0
16AntioxidantsAntioxidantsadditive · medium-1.8
  1. 1. Poultry Meal3.4% estimated
  2. 2. Chicken (53%)53% declared53.0% estimated
    Chicken · meat · medium
  3. 3. Turkey &/or Duck3.3% estimated
    Turkey · meat · medium
  4. 4. Rice (10%)10% declared10.0% estimated
    Rice - white · carb · medium
  5. 5. Maize Protein3.2% estimated
    Maize gluten · carb · poor
  6. 6. Sorghum3.1% estimated
    Sorghum · carb · medium
  7. 7. Chicken Fat3.0% estimated
    Chicken Oil and Fat · oil · good
  8. 8. Natural Flavour (Chicken)2.8% estimated
    Smoked Flavour · additive · poor
  9. 9. Dried Beet Pulp2.7% estimated
    Beet Pulp · fibre · medium
  10. 10. Sunflower Oil2.6% estimated
    Sunflower oil · oil · good
  11. 11. Vitamins & Minerals2.5% estimated
    Vitamin · supplement · good
  12. 12. Salt2.3% estimated
    Salt · additive · poor
  13. 13. Inulin2.2% estimated
    Inulin · fibre · good
  14. 14. Fish Oil2.1% estimated
    Fish Oil · oil · good
  15. 15. Colostrum2.0% estimated
    Colostrum · supplement · medium
  16. 16. Antioxidants1.8% estimated
    Antioxidants · additive · medium

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-17

Brand and contact: Advance

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-17
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
advancepet.com.au

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

This recipe achieves an overall rating of 40 out of 100 based on several key factors. Ingredients without printed percentages contributed -9.5 points to the assessment, while the processing format added -6.7 points. Furthermore, the additive load influenced the total by -5 points, and the carbohydrate content resulted in a contribution of -3.1 points.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.61
Carb share of dry matter27.1%-0.115-3.12
Oil share of dry matter23.1%-0.092-2.12
Additive share of dry matter19.2%0.163+3.13
Supplement share of dry matter7.7%-0.012-0.09
Recipe graded poor22.5%-0.065-1.46
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient8.7%0.060+0.52
Undeclared quantities90.0%-0.106-9.50
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-22.560.222-5.01
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.39.191+2.61
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter27.1%-0.115-3.12
Oil share of dry matter23.1%-0.092-2.12
Vegetable share of dry matter0.0%-0.005+0.00
Additive share of dry matter19.2%0.163+3.13
Supplement share of dry matter7.7%-0.012-0.09
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor22.5%-0.065-1.46
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients3-0.876-2.63
Largest single poor ingredient8.7%0.060+0.52
Undeclared quantities90.0%-0.106-9.50
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietyes2.294+2.29
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-22.560.222-5.01
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
39.8
Final score
40/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for puppies and growth. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

Scored against FEDIAF growth minima; puppy scoring is under review; Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein3134.3100
Fat2123.2100
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3)--100
Energy (kcal/100g)395436.5100

Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100, omega-3 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.

Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (10% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)2/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Brain Health (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Digestive Health (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Immunity Natural Defences (on pack)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
with Chicken (equiv. 53%) (on pack)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
source of Omega 3 DHA for brain, eyes and nervous system development (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
supports skin and coat condition (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
supports joint health (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
supports healthy gut microbiome (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Vitamin E helps support a pet's immune health (on page)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Puppy Medium Breed Chicken with Rice

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Advance

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.