Our verdict
Is ABLE Turkey a good dog food?
We score it 87/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete raw food for adult dogs, with turkey, carrots and butternut squash as the main ingredients.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 38.6% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 13.60% · Fat 10.30%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 13.60% |
| Fat | 10.30% |
| Fibre | 0.13% |
| Ash | 1.14% |
| Moisture | 73.30% |
Energy: 153 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Storage
Keep frozen
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (18)20% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 80.0%
- veg 12.4%
- oil 3.9%
- supplement 2.2%
- fibre 1.4%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Turkey 80% | Turkey | meat · medium | 80 | 80.0 |
| 2 | carrots | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 3 | butternut squash | Butternut Squash | veg · good | - | 1.5 |
| 4 | flaxseed meal | Linseed Cake | fibre · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 5 | kale | Kale | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 6 | flaxseed oil | Linseed oil | oil · good | - | 1.4 |
| 7 | cod liver oil | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | - | 1.3 |
| 8 | kelp meal | Seaweed Meal | supplement · medium | - | 1.3 |
| 9 | wheatgerm oil | Wheatgerm Oil | oil · medium | - | 1.2 |
| 10 | dried spirulina | Spirulina | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 11 | turmeric | Turmeric | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 12 | chicory root powder | Chicory root | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 13 | watercress herb powder | Watercress | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 14 | spinach powder | Spinach | veg · good | - | 1.0 |
| 15 | gingko biloba powder | Ginkgo Biloba | supplement · medium | - | 1.0 |
| 16 | bilberry powder | Bilberry Powder | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 17 | blueberry powder | Blueberries | veg · good | - | 0.9 |
| 18 | cranberry powder | Cranberries | veg · good | - | 0.8 |
- 1. Turkey 80%80% declared80.0% estimated
- 2. carrots1.5% estimated
- 3. butternut squash1.5% estimated
- 4. flaxseed meal1.4% estimated
- 5. kale1.4% estimated
- 6. flaxseed oil1.4% estimated
- 7. cod liver oil1.3% estimated
- 8. kelp meal1.3% estimated
- 9. wheatgerm oil1.2% estimated
- 10. dried spirulina1.2% estimated
- 11. turmeric1.1% estimated
- 12. chicory root powder1.1% estimated
- 13. watercress herb powder1.0% estimated
- 14. spinach powder1.0% estimated
- 15. gingko biloba powder1.0% estimated
- 16. bilberry powder0.9% estimated
- 17. blueberry powder0.9% estimated
- 18. cranberry powder0.8% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-15
Brand and contact: ABLE
- Website
- https://www.able.dog/
- [email protected]
- Phone
- 01485 500433
- Address
- The Pet Nutrition Company Ltd, Georgia Road, Tattersett Business Park, NR21 7RF
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-15
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.able.dog
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.0/5 · 33 reviews
Facebook: - · 36 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall score of 87 out of 100 based on several key factors. The overall quality of the ingredient list contributed +5.8 points, and the meat content added +5.7 points. However, ingredients without printed percentages reduced the score by -2.1, and the oil and fat content made an adjustment of -0.9.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.81 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 59.8% | 0.096 | +5.74 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.092 | -0.95 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.191 | +5.81 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 59.8% | 0.096 | +5.74 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.115 | +0.00 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 10.3% | -0.092 | -0.95 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 21.0% | -0.005 | -0.11 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 5.4% | -0.012 | -0.07 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 20.0% | -0.106 | -2.11 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 1.0 | 11.084 | +11.08 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.12 | 33.786 | +37.84 |
| Processing: Raw | yes | -0.054 | -0.05 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -1.74
- Subtotal
- 87.1
- Final score
- 87/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Score history across model versions
The score shown above is always computed with the latest published model. Earlier scores are kept for the record and are never edited or deleted; a scoring change ships as a new model version with a public write-up on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 13.6 | 50.9 (band 25.786516853932582 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10.3 | 38.6 (band 7.879213483146066 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 0.13 | 0.5 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 69.8 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 153 | 573 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (80% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 16/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "A complete raw food for adult working dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
2 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Comprising 80% Turkey (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| All human-grade (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| A complete raw food for adult working dogs (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Turkey
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.