Tribal Fresh Pressed Turkey Senior / Light
Dry Cold Pressed · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Tribal Fresh Pressed Turkey Senior / Light a good dog food?
We score it 66/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Complete cold-pressed dry food for senior dogs, with turkey, sweet potatoes and beet pulp as the main ingredients.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for senior dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists turkey
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists whiting
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 19.4% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (23)23% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 36.8%
- carb 35.0%
- veg 13.9%
- unknown 6.3%
- supplement 3.7%
- fibre 3.5%
- oil 0.8%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fresh Turkey (35%) | Turkey | meat · medium | 35 | 35.0 |
| 2 | Sweet Potato (35%) | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 35 | 35.0 |
| 3 | Beet Pulp | Beet Pulp | fibre · medium | - | 1.7 |
| 4 | Blue Whiting | Whiting | meat · good | - | 1.6 |
| 5 | Whole Egg (5%) | Egg | meat · good | 5 | 5.0 |
| 6 | Carrot | Carrots | veg · good | - | 1.6 |
| 7 | Brewer's Yeast | Brewer's Yeast | supplement · good | - | 1.5 |
| 8 | Sunflower Oil (1.3%) | Sunflower oil | oil · good | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| 9 | Salmon Oil (0.75%) | Salmon Oil | oil · good | 0.75 | 0.8 |
| 10 | Inulin (source of prebiotic FOS) | Inulin | fibre · good | - | 1.5 |
| 11 | Herb Mix | Herbs | veg · medium | - | 1.4 |
| 12 | Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | - | 1.4 |
| 13 | Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 14 | Nettle | Nettles | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 15 | Chamomile | Chamomile | veg · good | - | 1.3 |
| 16 | Sage | Sage | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 17 | Thyme | Thyme | veg · good | - | 1.2 |
| 18 | Coriander Leaves | Coriander Leaves | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 19 | Dandelion Leaves | Dandelion Leaves | veg · good | - | 1.1 |
| 20 | Liquorice | Liquorice | veg · medium | - | 1.0 |
| 21 | Glucosamine | Glucosamine | supplement · good | - | 1.0 |
| 22 | Chondroitin Sulphate | Chondroitin | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
| 23 | Green Lipped Mussel | Green-Lipped Mussel | supplement · good | - | 0.9 |
- 1. Fresh Turkey (35%)35% declared35.0% estimated
- 2. Sweet Potato (35%)35% declared35.0% estimated
- 3. Beet Pulp1.7% estimated
- 4. Blue Whiting1.6% estimated
- 5. Whole Egg (5%)5% declared5.0% estimated
- 6. Carrot1.6% estimated
- 7. Brewer's Yeast1.5% estimated
- 8. Sunflower Oil (1.3%)1.3% declared1.3% estimated
- 9. Salmon Oil (0.75%)0.75% declared0.8% estimated
- 10. Inulin (source of prebiotic FOS)1.5% estimated
- 11. Herb Mix1.4% estimated
- 12. Parsley1.4% estimated
- 13. Rosemary1.3% estimated
- 14. Nettle1.3% estimated
- 15. Chamomile1.3% estimated
- 16. Sage1.2% estimated
- 17. Thyme1.2% estimated
- 18. Coriander Leaves1.1% estimated
- 19. Dandelion Leaves1.1% estimated
- 20. Liquorice1.0% estimated
- 21. Glucosamine1.0% estimated
- 22. Chondroitin Sulphate0.9% estimated
- 23. Green Lipped Mussel0.9% estimated
Nutrition and feedingProtein 19.40% · Fat 9.50%
Declared analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 19.40% |
| Fat | 9.50% |
| Fibre | 3.30% |
| Ash | 6.60% |
| Omega-3 fatty acids | 0.18% |
| Omega-6 fatty acids | 1.54% |
| Calcium | 0.90% |
| Phosphorus | 0.55% |
Energy: 357.2 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Recommended daily ration: 5kg=85g (65g weight loss), 10kg=140g (110g), 15kg=190g (150g), 20kg=240g (185g), 25kg=280g (220g), 30kg=320g (250g), 40kg=400g (310g), 50kg=475g (370g), 60kg=540g (420g). Transition over 7 days.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamine A 15000 UI/kg; Vitamine D3 1500 UI/kg; Sulfate ferreux monohydraté 75 mg/kg; Oxyde manganeux 49 mg/kg; Sulfate de cuivre pentahydraté 4 mg/kg; Sulfate de zinc monohydraté 75 mg/kg; Iodate de calcium anhydre 1,7 mg/kg; Sélénite de sodium 0,2 mg/kg
Technological additives
Antioxydants: Extraits d'origine naturelle riches en tocophérol
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-10-05
Brand and contact: Tribal
- Website
- https://tribalpets.com/uk/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-10-05
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- tribalpets.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The product scores 66 out of 100. The processing format had a negative effect, costing -6.7 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list worked in its favour, adding +6.5 points. The carbohydrate content dragged the score down by -3.2 points, while the meat content boosted it by +3 points.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.48 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 31.0% | 0.096 | +2.97 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 27.7% | -0.115 | -3.18 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.3% | -0.092 | -0.22 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 10.0% | -0.027 | -0.26 |
| Undeclared quantities | 22.9% | -0.106 | -2.42 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.7 | 9.191 | +6.48 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 31.0% | 0.096 | +2.97 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 27.7% | -0.115 | -3.18 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 2.3% | -0.092 | -0.22 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 6.6% | -0.005 | -0.03 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.012 | -0.13 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 10.0% | -0.027 | -0.26 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 22.9% | -0.106 | -2.42 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 66.2
- Final score
- 66/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 19.4 | 21.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 78.6 |
| Fat | 9.5 | 10.4 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 90.1 |
| Fibre | 3.3 | 3.6 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.9 | 1 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 84.4 |
| Phosphorus | 0.55 | 0.6 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 80 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.6 | 1.6 (band 1 to 2%) | 100 |
| Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3) | - | - | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 357.2 | 389.5 | 100 |
Omega fatty acids (omega-6 and omega-3): scored as the mean of its declared components (omega-6 100). The FEDIAF minimum for omega-6 is linoleic acid specifically.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 100); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8.3% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 8 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamine A 15000 UI/kg
- Vitamine D3 1500 UI/kg
- Sulfate ferreux monohydraté 75 mg/kg
- Oxyde manganeux 49 mg/kg
- Sulfate de cuivre pentahydraté 4 mg/kg
- Sulfate de zinc monohydraté 75 mg/kg
- Iodate de calcium anhydre 1,7 mg/kg
- Sélénite de sodium 0,2 mg/kg
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (77.1% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 15.4/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
Claims on file; none we can check against the label
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| complètes, sans céréales et naturelles (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Fresh Pressed™ (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| hypoallergénique, léger sur l'estomac et facilite la digestion (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Dinde fraîche élevée en plein air (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Merlan bleu certifié MSC (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Œufs pondus en liberté (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Riche en acides gras essentiels oméga-3 & 6, idéaux pour une peau saine et un pelage soyeux (on page) | Nutrient | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Renforts articulaires naturels: glucosamine, chondroïtine et moule verte pour protéger le cartilage des articulations et encourager la mobilité (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ne gonflent pas (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Fresh Pressed Turkey Senior / Light
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.