Lenda VET Diabetic
Dry Extruded complete
Is Lenda VET Diabetic a good dog food?
We score it 51/100 (Average). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Why this score?
This recipe achieves an overall rating of 51 out of 100. The meat content contributed +3.1 points, while the overall quality of the ingredient list added +5.6 points to the total. However, the processing format reduced the score by -7 and ingredients without printed percentages decreased it by -13.1.
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
- Recipe51
- Nutritionallow98
- Transparency40
- Safety100
- Evidencelimited33
The Recipe score measures how attractive and transparent the declared ingredient list is. It is not, by itself, proof that the food is nutritionally appropriate for long-term feeding. The Nutritional and Evidence scores measure what we can verify towards that stronger claim.
Complete extruded dry food for adult dogs, with dehydrated poultry proteins, barley and maize gluten as the main ingredients.
Why you might choose it
- High in protein: 39% protein on a dry-matter basis.
- Declares energy content, which most labels omit.
- Nutritionally complete: formulated to be fed as the whole diet.
Why you might not
- 100% of the recipe mass has no printed percentage, so the exact split cannot be verified.
Estimated composition
Typical analysis (as fed)
- Protein
- 39%
- Fat
- 10%
- Fibre
- 6.50%
- Ash
- 7.50%
- Carbohydrates
- 29%
Energy: 334 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Nutritional additives
Glucosamine 500 mg/kg; Chondroitin sulphate 500 mg/kg; Methylsulfonylmethane 250 mg/kg; Yucca schidigera extract; Yeast extract (MOS and nucleotides source); Chicory root (inulin source); Salvia rosmarinus; Melissa officinalis; Taraxacum officinale; Salvia officinalis; Mentha; Vaccinium macrocarpon; Cynara scolymus; Silybum marianum; Enterococcus faecium; Lactobacillus plantarum
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists dehydrated poultry proteins
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists krill
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists barley
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Use the homepage filter to find foods that fit your dog.
Ingredients (35)
| # | As declared | Matched | Category | Tier | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dehydrated poultry proteins | Dehydrated Poultry Proteins | meat | good | - | 3.8 |
| 2 | Barley | Barley | carb | medium | - | 3.7 |
| 3 | Maize gluten | Maize gluten | carb | poor | - | 3.7 |
| 4 | vegetable fibres (beetroot) | Vegetable fibre | fibre | medium | - | 3.6 |
| 5 | poultry fat | Poultry Fat | oil | medium | - | 3.6 |
| 6 | lignocellulose | Lignocellulose | fibre | medium | - | 3.5 |
| 7 | hydrolysed animal proteins (poultry and porcine) | Hydrolysed Animal Protein | meat | medium | - | 3.5 |
| 8 | refined Chicken oil | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil | good | - | 3.4 |
| 9 | dehydrated Egg | Dried Egg | meat | medium | - | 3.3 |
| 10 | Apple pulp | Apple Fibre | fibre | medium | - | 3.3 |
| 11 | dehydrated Krill (Euphausia superba, source of Omega-3 fatty acids and astaxanthin) | Krill | meat | good | - | 3.2 |
| 12 | Moringa oleifera | Moringa Oleifera | veg | good | - | 3.2 |
| 13 | Yucca schidigera extract | Yucca Schidigera | supplement | good | - | 3.1 |
| 14 | yeast extract (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as a source of MOS and nucleotides) | Yeast | supplement | good | - | 3.1 |
| 15 | chicory root | Chicory root | veg | good | - | 3.0 |
| 16 | Salvia rosmarinus | Sage | veg | good | - | 3.0 |
| 17 | Melissa officinalis | Lemon Balm | veg | good | - | 2.9 |
| 18 | Taraxacum officinale | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.9 |
| 19 | Salvia officinalis | Sage | veg | good | - | 2.8 |
| 20 | Mentha | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.7 |
| 21 | Vaccinium macrocarpon | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.7 |
| 22 | Cynara scolymus | Artichoke | veg | good | - | 2.6 |
| 23 | Silybum marianum | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.6 |
| 24 | Panax ginseng | Ginseng | supplement | medium | - | 2.5 |
| 25 | Punica granatum | Pomegranate | veg | good | - | 2.5 |
| 26 | Zingiber officinale | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.4 |
| 27 | Urtica dioica | Nettles | veg | good | - | 2.4 |
| 28 | Camellia sinensis | unmatched | - | - | - | 2.3 |
| 29 | Curcuma longa | Turmeric | veg | good | - | 2.3 |
| 30 | microalgae oil Schizochytrium sp | Microalgae Oil | oil | good | - | 2.2 |
| 31 | (source of Omega 3 DHA fatty acids) | DHA | supplement | good | - | 2.2 |
| 32 | Enterococcus faecium | Enterococcus Faecium | supplement | good | - | 2.1 |
| 33 | Lactobacillus plantarum | Lactobacillus plantarum | supplement | good | - | 2.0 |
| 34 | Lactobacillus fermentum | Lactobacillus fermentum | supplement | good | - | 2.0 |
| 35 | Saccharomyces boulardii | Saccharomyces Boulardii | supplement | good | - | 1.9 |
Brand
- Website
- https://lenda.net/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-14
- Scored with
- Model v2 (methodology)
- Product page
- shop.lenda.net
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v2 on 2026-09-22. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.56 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.4% | 0.116 | +3.06 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.113 | -1.65 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.0% | -0.088 | -1.77 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.009 | -0.16 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.045 | -0.32 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Additive penalty | -0.22 | 0.236 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.6 | 9.915 | +5.56 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 26.4% | 0.116 | +3.06 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 14.7% | -0.113 | -1.65 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 20.0% | -0.088 | -1.77 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.002 | -0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.177 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 18.4% | -0.009 | -0.16 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.371 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.022 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 7.2% | -0.045 | -0.32 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.182 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.868 | -0.87 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 7.2% | 0.056 | +0.41 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.131 | -13.09 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 3.194 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 1.703 | +1.70 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 11.440 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | -0.506 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -1.988 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.250 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | -0.073 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | -0.339 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 16.475 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.22 | 0.236 | -0.05 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 32.336 | +32.34 |
| Processing: Raw | no | 13.322 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | 7.712 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | 6.583 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 4.857 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | 0.072 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 11.127 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 9.320 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | 4.569 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -2.321 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.996 | -7.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.833 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.711 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | 2.935 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | 2.292 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.01
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 51.5
- Final score
- 51/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 39 | 42.4 (band 18 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 10 | 10.9 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 92.2 |
| Fibre | 6.5 | 7.1 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 334 | 363 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 8% from the food type.
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The marketing claims made on the pack and product page, and how much evidence sits behind them. We record the claims as stated; we do not assess whether they are true.
| Claim | Type | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|
| Helps regulate glucose intake (diabetes mellitus) (on page) | Functional | Manufacturer assertion |
| Specific balance of protein and fat (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low content of monosaccharides and disaccharides (on pack) | High/low level | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete veterinary complete feed for adult dogs with diabetes (on pack) | Content | Manufacturer assertion |
| Low content of monosaccharides and disaccharides for the regulation of glucose intake (Diabetes mellitus) (on pack) | High/low level | Manufacturer assertion |
Limited: at least one claim rests on manufacturer assertion alone.
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Other products from Lenda
Alternatives to VET Diabetic
Foods in our database that are similar on ingredients, protein, format or price. Scores and figures are from the same deterministic model used everywhere on the site.
Community
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.