Lakefields Manufaktur Nassfutter-Menü Pferd mit Süßkartoffel, Karotte und Kürbis
Wet Chunks · completeHigh meatClear label
Our verdict
Is Lakefields Manufaktur Nassfutter-Menü Pferd mit Süßkartoffel, Karotte und Kürbis a good dog food?
We score it 77/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You are limiting fat: 25.5% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.20% · Fat 5.40%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 8.20% |
| Fat | 5.40% |
| Fibre | 1% |
| Ash | 1.40% |
| Moisture | 78.80% |
Energy: 101 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Idealgewicht 5 kg: 247–370 g; 10 kg: 415–620 g; 20 kg: 700–1050 g; 30 kg: 950–1420 g; 40 kg: 1180–1760 g pro Tag. Richtwerte, abhängig von Rasse, Aktivität und Alter.
No additives recorded yet.
Ingredients (16)0% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 60.2%
- carb 20.4%
- veg 18.3%
- mineral 0.9%
- oil 0.1%
- unknown 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 30% Muscle Meat | Muscle Meat | meat · good | 30 | 30.0 |
| 2 | 30% Heart | Horse Heart | meat · good | 30 | 30.0 |
| 3 | Sweet Potato 20.4% | Sweet Potatoes | carb · good | 20.4 | 20.4 |
| 4 | Carrot 8.1% | Carrots | veg · good | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| 5 | Apple 6.4% | Apples | veg · good | 6.4 | 6.4 |
| 6 | Pumpkin 3.4% | Pumpkin | veg · good | 3.4 | 3.4 |
| 7 | Dried Algae Limestone 0.8% | Limestone | mineral · medium | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 8 | Cod Liver Oil 0.2% | Cod Liver Oil | oil · good | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 9 | 0.07% Rosemary | Rosemary | veg · good | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| 10 | 0.07% Parsley | Parsley | veg · good | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| 11 | 0.07% Lovage | Lovage | veg · good | 0.07 | 0.07 |
| 12 | Linseed 0.1% | Linseed | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 13 | Sea Salt 0.1% | Sea Salt | mineral · medium | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 14 | Dried Rosehip 0.1% | Rose Hip | veg · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 15 | Rapeseed Oil 0.1% | Rapeseed oil | oil · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 16 | Dried Seaweed 0.1% | Dried Sea Algae | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. 30% Muscle Meat30% declared30.0% estimated
- 2. 30% Heart30% declared30.0% estimated
- 3. Sweet Potato 20.4%20.4% declared20.4% estimated
- 4. Carrot 8.1%8.1% declared8.1% estimated
- 5. Apple 6.4%6.4% declared6.4% estimated
- 6. Pumpkin 3.4%3.4% declared3.4% estimated
- 7. Dried Algae Limestone 0.8%0.8% declared0.8% estimated
- 8. Cod Liver Oil 0.2%0.2% declared0.2% estimated
- 9. 0.07% Rosemary0.07% declared0.07% estimated
- 10. 0.07% Parsley0.07% declared0.07% estimated
- 11. 0.07% Lovage0.07% declared0.07% estimated
- 12. Linseed 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 13. Sea Salt 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 14. Dried Rosehip 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 15. Rapeseed Oil 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 16. Dried Seaweed 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: Lakefields Manufaktur
- Website
- https://www.lakefields.de/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.lakefields.de
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 318 reviews
3 reviews on this product · 5.0/5
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
The recipe scored 77 out of 100. +8.4 points came from the overall quality of the ingredient list, and the meat content contributed a further +6.3 points. However, -2.3 points were deducted because of the carbohydrate content, and a further -0.7 points were lost due to the processing format.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 65.4% | 0.096 | +6.28 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.115 | -2.28 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.092 | -0.04 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.1% | -0.106 | -0.01 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.9 | 9.191 | +8.42 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 65.4% | 0.096 | +6.28 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 19.8% | -0.115 | -2.28 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.4% | -0.092 | -0.04 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 10.9% | -0.005 | -0.06 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.012 | +0.00 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.027 | -0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 0.0% | -0.065 | +0.00 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 0 | -0.876 | +0.00 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 0.0% | 0.060 | +0.00 |
| Undeclared quantities | 0.1% | -0.106 | -0.01 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | yes | 0.707 | +0.71 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | no | -3.158 | +0.00 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -0.00 | 0.222 | -0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 1.00 | 33.786 | +33.79 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | yes | -0.672 | -0.67 |
- Processing-type offset
- -0.08
- Subtotal
- 77.0
- Final score
- 77/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 8.2 | 38.7 (band 21.438679245283016 to 40%) | 100 |
| Fat | 5.4 | 25.5 (band 6.550707547169811 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 1 | 4.7 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 101 | 476.4 | 100 |
Scored over 4 declared nutrients (combined weight 60); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.
No nutritional additives section declared on the label.
Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (99.9% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 20/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
75/100 · limited — 4 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 1 contradicted.
Contradicted by the label
- "100% Monoprotein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.
Consistent with the label
- "100% frei von Getreide, Zucker, Konservierungs- und Füllstoffen" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
- "Alleinfuttermittel für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
- "getreidefrei" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Regionales Obst & Gemüse aus der Bodenseeregion (on page) | provenance | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Von Tierärzten & Ernährungswissenschaftlern entwickelte Rezepturen (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| ideal für Hunde mit Futtermittelallergien oder Empfindlichkeiten (on page) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% frei von Getreide, Zucker, Konservierungs- und Füllstoffen (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Alleinfuttermittel für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| getreidefrei (on page) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Monoprotein (on page) | Content | contradicted | Manufacturer assertion |
| Frischfleisch von zertifizierten Betrieben (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Lebensmittelqualität (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Nährstofferhaltend & schonend im Wasserbad gegart (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Alternatives to Nassfutter-Menü Pferd mit Süßkartoffel, Karotte und Kürbis
Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.