Lakefields Manufaktur Nassfutter-Menü Huhn mit Apfel, Karotte und Fenchel

Wet Pate · completeHigh meatClear label

Nassfutter-Menü Huhn mit Apfel, Karotte und Fenchel
Good
our rating

Our verdict

Is Lakefields Manufaktur Nassfutter-Menü Huhn mit Apfel, Karotte und Fenchel a good dog food?

We score it 77/100 (Good). This reflects the ingredient quality, composition and label transparency of the recipe as declared on the label.

How we score

Why you might choose it

  • Meat makes up an estimated 69% of the dry matter (61% as fed).
  • Prints ingredient percentages on the label.
  • Prints a percentage for nearly every ingredient, so the recipe is fully auditable.

Why you might not

  • High in fat: 28% fat on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
  • Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
  • Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists chicken heart
  • Your dog avoids fish: the label lists cod liver oil
  • You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
  • You are limiting fat: 28.1% on a dry-matter basis is in the high band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 8.80% · Fat 6.10%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fedDry matterDirectory average
Protein8.80%40.55%37.69% (137 eligible foods)
Fat6.10%28.11%23.89% (134 eligible foods)
Fibre0.90%4.15%3.81% (135 eligible foods)
Ash1.20%5.53%8.99% (130 eligible foods)
Moisture78.30%--
Carbohydrates-21.66%30.63% (76 eligible foods)

Additives & feeding info

Feeding and storage

Feeding guide

Idealgewicht 2.5 kg: 145-215 g/Tag; 5 kg: 240-360 g; 7.5 kg: 330-500 g; 10 kg: 400-600 g; 15 kg: 550-820 g; 20 kg: 680-1020 g; 25 kg: 800-1200 g; 30 kg: 920-1400 g; 35 kg: 1050-1550 g; 40 kg: 1150-1750 g. Richtwerte, abhängig von Rasse, Aktivität und Alter.

No additives recorded yet.

Ingredients (21)21 of 21 percentages printed

Estimated composition

  • meat 61.2%
  • veg 28.0%
  • carb 10.0%
  • unknown 0.4%
  • oil 0.3%
  • supplement 0.1%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
118.67% muscle meatMuscle Meatmeat · good18.6718.7
218.67% heartChicken Heartmeat · good18.6718.7
318.67% stomachStomachmeat · medium18.6718.7
45% liverChicken Livermeat · good55.0
5Potato 10%Potatoescarb · medium1010.0
6Apple 9%Applesveg · good99.0
7Carrots 7.6%Carrotsveg · good7.67.6
8Fennel 6%Fennelveg · good66.0
9Zucchini 4%Courgetteveg · good44.0
10Linseed 0.5%Linseedveg · good0.50.5
11Rose Hip 0.5%Rose Hipveg · good0.50.5
12Egg Shell 0.4%Eggmeat · good0.40.4
13Rapeseed Oil 0.3%Rapeseed oiloil · good0.30.3
14Cod Liver Oil 0.2%Cod Liver Oiloil · good0.20.2
150.05% dillDillveg · good0.050.05
160.05% nettleNettlesveg · good0.050.05
170.05% parsleyParsleyveg · good0.050.05
180.05% lovage) (driedLovageveg · good0.050.05
19Thyme 0.1%Thymeveg · good0.10.1
20Seaweed 0.1%Seaweedveg · good0.10.1
21Mineral Clay 0.1%Mineral Claymineral · good0.10.1
  1. 1. 18.67% muscle meat18.67% declared18.7% estimated
    Muscle Meat · meat · good
  2. 2. 18.67% heart18.67% declared18.7% estimated
    Chicken Heart · meat · good
  3. 3. 18.67% stomach18.67% declared18.7% estimated
    Stomach · meat · medium
  4. 4. 5% liver5% declared5.0% estimated
    Chicken Liver · meat · good
  5. 5. Potato 10%10% declared10.0% estimated
    Potatoes · carb · medium
  6. 6. Apple 9%9% declared9.0% estimated
    Apples · veg · good
  7. 7. Carrots 7.6%7.6% declared7.6% estimated
    Carrots · veg · good
  8. 8. Fennel 6%6% declared6.0% estimated
    Fennel · veg · good
  9. 9. Zucchini 4%4% declared4.0% estimated
    Courgette · veg · good
  10. 10. Linseed 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Linseed · veg · good
  11. 11. Rose Hip 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
    Rose Hip · veg · good
  12. 12. Egg Shell 0.4%0.4% declared0.4% estimated
    Egg · meat · good
  13. 13. Rapeseed Oil 0.3%0.3% declared0.3% estimated
    Rapeseed oil · oil · good
  14. 14. Cod Liver Oil 0.2%0.2% declared0.2% estimated
    Cod Liver Oil · oil · good
  15. 15. 0.05% dill0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Dill · veg · good
  16. 16. 0.05% nettle0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Nettles · veg · good
  17. 17. 0.05% parsley0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Parsley · veg · good
  18. 18. 0.05% lovage) (dried0.05% declared0.05% estimated
    Lovage · veg · good
  19. 19. Thyme 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Thyme · veg · good
  20. 20. Seaweed 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Seaweed · veg · good
  21. 21. Mineral Clay 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
    Mineral Clay · mineral · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19

Brand and contact: Lakefields Manufaktur

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-19
Scored with
Model v3 (methodology)
Product page
www.lakefields.de

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 318 reviews

4 reviews on this product · 5.0/5

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Why this score?

The food scores 77 out of 100. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +7.3 points, while the meat content contributed +6.6 points. The carbohydrate content reduced the score by -1.2, and the processing format brought it down by -0.7.

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.29
Meat share of dry matter68.9%0.096+6.61
Carb share of dry matter10.0%-0.115-1.16
Oil share of dry matter1.2%-0.092-0.11
Vegetable share of dry matter18.7%-0.005-0.10
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.8%-0.027-0.02
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.89.191+7.29
Meat share of dry matter68.9%0.096+6.61
Carb share of dry matter10.0%-0.115-1.16
Oil share of dry matter1.2%-0.092-0.11
Vegetable share of dry matter18.7%-0.005-0.10
Additive share of dry matter0.0%0.163+0.00
Supplement share of dry matter0.4%-0.012-0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.8%-0.027-0.02
Recipe graded poor0.0%-0.065+0.00
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients0-0.876+0.00
Largest single poor ingredient0.0%0.060+0.00
Undeclared quantities0.0%-0.106+0.00
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)yes0.707+0.71
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)no-3.158+0.00
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty0.000.222+0.00
Processing multiplier1.0033.786+33.79
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateyes-0.672-0.67
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
-0.08
Subtotal
77.2
Final score
77/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.

NutrientAs fed (label)Dry matter (scored)Score
Protein8.840.6 (band 18 to 40%)100
Fat6.128.1 (band 5.5 to 20%)100
Fibre0.94.1 (band 0.5 to 5%)100

Scored over 3 declared nutrients (combined weight 50); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score.

No nutritional additives section declared on the label.

Medium confidence: the full five-part analysis is on file; where moisture was not declared it was estimated from the food type.

This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✓ Printed percentages on the label (100% of the recipe mass) (voluntary)20/20
✓ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory)15/15
✗ Additives declared (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✗ Energy value declared (voluntary) - not on file0/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✓ Feeding guidance given (mandatory)10/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Additives declared, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

75/100 · limited — 4 checkable claims: 3 consistent, 1 contradicted.

Contradicted by the label

  • "100% Monoprotein" — the declared label says otherwise on single protein.

Consistent with the label

  • "Alleinfuttermittel für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
  • "100% frei von Getreide, Zucker, Konservierungs- und Füllstoffen" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
  • "Ohne Getreide, Zusatzstoffe oder Zucker" — supported by the declared grain-free data.

5 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.

Limited: at least one claim contradicts the declared label, or a recent upheld ASA ruling applies.

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
Frischfleisch von zertifizierten Betrieben (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
Regionales Obst & Gemüse aus der Bodenseeregion (on page)provenancenot checkableManufacturer assertion
nährstofferhaltend & schonend im Wasserbad gegart (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Alleinfuttermittel für alle ausgewachsenen Hunde (on pack)ContentconsistentManufacturer assertion
100% frei von Getreide, Zucker, Konservierungs- und Füllstoffen (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
Calcium/Phosphor-Verhältnis 1,3 : 1,0 (on pack)Nutrientnot checkableManufacturer assertion
100% Lebensmittelqualität (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Ohne Getreide, Zusatzstoffe oder Zucker (on page)Free-fromconsistentManufacturer assertion
100% Monoprotein (on page)ContentcontradictedManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

Alternatives to Nassfutter-Menü Huhn mit Apfel, Karotte und Fenchel

Similar on ingredients, protein, format or nutrition, using the same stored data.

See all alternatives

See all products from Lakefields Manufaktur

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.