WOW Natural Dentals Small & Midi mit Geflügel & Granatapfel
Treat · complementaryClear label
Our verdict
Is WOW Natural Dentals Small & Midi mit Geflügel & Granatapfel a good dog food?
This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.
77% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Grain-free: no grain ingredients listed
- Doesn't list beef, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids chicken: the label lists hydrolysed poultry protein
- Your dog avoids turkey: the label lists hydrolysed poultry protein
- You want a single-protein recipe: this one lists more than one animal protein
- You need more protein than this: 13.9% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
What the label tells us
- The label lists 13 ingredients.
- Uses generic terms (Hydrolysed Poultry Protein): the specific animal source is not stated.
- Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
- Prints quantities for 9 ingredients.
Why is this treat not scored?
Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.
What should I look for on a treat label?
A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.
These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 11.50% · Fat 2%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed |
|---|---|
| Protein | 11.50% |
| Fat | 2% |
| Fibre | 4.50% |
| Ash | 3.50% |
| Moisture | 17% |
| Calcium | 0.30% |
| Phosphorus | 0.40% |
| Sodium | 0.20% |
Energy: 284 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
1/2 Stick / 24 Stunden für Hunde unter 10 kg; 1 Stick / 24 Stunden für Hunde über 10 kg
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin C 35 mg/kg
Technological additives
Konservierungsmittel: Zitronensäure; Konservierungsmittel: DL-Apfelsäure; Konservierungsmittel: Kaliumsorbat
Ingredients (13)77% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- carb 44.4%
- unknown 22.2%
- other 17.8%
- fibre 14.9%
- supplement 0.6%
- oil 0.1%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Potato Starch | Potato starch | carb · poor | - | 23.7 |
| 2 | Pea Flour | Pea flour | carb · medium | - | 20.7 |
| 3 | Hydrolysed Poultry Protein 20% | Hydrolysed Poultry Protein | meat · medium | 20 | 20.0 |
| 4 | Vegetable Glycerine | Glycerine | other · medium | - | 17.8 |
| 5 | Lignocellulose | Lignocellulose | fibre · medium | - | 14.8 |
| 6 | Dried Mint 1% | Mint | veg · good | 1 | 1.0 |
| 7 | Sodium Hexametaphosphate 0.6% | Sodium hexametaphosphate | additive · medium | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 8 | Calcium Carbonate 0.5% | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 9 | Dried Algae 0.3% | Seaweed | veg · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 10 | Dried Pomegranate Seeds 0.3% | Pomegranate Seeds | veg · good | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 11 | Coconut Oil 0.1% | Coconut Oil | oil · medium | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 12 | Inulin 0.1% | Inulin | fibre · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 13 | MOS 0.1% | Mannanoligosaccharides | supplement · good | 0.1 | 0.1 |
- 1. Potato Starch23.7% estimated
- 2. Pea Flour20.7% estimated
- 3. Hydrolysed Poultry Protein 20%20% declared20.0% estimated
- 4. Vegetable Glycerine17.8% estimated
- 5. Lignocellulose14.8% estimated
- 6. Dried Mint 1%1% declared1.0% estimated
- 7. Sodium Hexametaphosphate 0.6%0.6% declared0.6% estimated
- 8. Calcium Carbonate 0.5%0.5% declared0.5% estimated
- 9. Dried Algae 0.3%0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 10. Dried Pomegranate Seeds 0.3%0.3% declared0.3% estimated
- 11. Coconut Oil 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 12. Inulin 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
- 13. MOS 0.1%0.1% declared0.1% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-19
Brand and contact: WOW
- Website
- https://www.wow.pet/
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-19
- Product page
- www.wow.pet
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 4.7/5 · 3,216 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.55 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.9% | -0.115 | -4.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.092 | -0.02 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 15.2% | -0.375 | -5.68 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.027 | -0.50 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.7% | -0.065 | -1.54 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 23.7% | 0.060 | +1.42 |
| Undeclared quantities | 77.0% | -0.106 | -8.13 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.4 | 9.191 | +3.55 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 41.9% | -0.115 | -4.82 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 0.2% | -0.092 | -0.02 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.163 | +0.00 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 0.9% | -0.012 | -0.01 |
| Other share of dry matter | 15.2% | -0.375 | -5.68 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 18.9% | -0.027 | -0.50 |
| Recipe graded poor | 23.7% | -0.065 | -1.54 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 1 | -0.876 | -0.88 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 23.7% | 0.060 | +1.42 |
| Undeclared quantities | 77.0% | -0.106 | -8.13 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | no | 2.294 | +0.00 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | 0.00 | 0.222 | +0.00 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +2 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 39.6
- Final score
- 40/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (23% of the recipe mass) (voluntary) | 4.6/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) | 15/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Hergestellt ohne: Getreide, Zucker und Salz" — supported by the declared grain-free data.
7 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lange Kauzeit: intensive Reinigung (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natriumhexametaphosphat kann helfen, Zahnstein zu verringern (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Minze kann den Atem erfrischen (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Kalzium kann starke und gesunde Zähne unterstützen (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Natur im Napf (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Natürlicher, kalorienarmer Zahnpflege-Kauartikel für ausgewachsene Hunde (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Hergestellt ohne: Getreide, Zucker und Salz (on pack) | Free-from | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
| Beste Zutaten (on page) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.