Three Dog Bakery Ho Ho Ho Hot Chowcolate

Treat · complementary

Ho Ho Ho Hot Chowcolate
This is sold as a treat, not as an everyday meal. The 1–100 rating applies to complete meals, so it isn't scored. Ingredient breakdown below.

Our verdict

Is Three Dog Bakery Ho Ho Ho Hot Chowcolate a good dog food?

This is a treat, not a complete diet, so it is not scored on our 1-100 scale. The ingredient breakdown below shows what is in it; a treat should be fed alongside, not instead of, a complete diet.

How we score

Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.

100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.

Why you might choose it

  • Declares energy content, which most labels omit.

Why you might not

  • A treat, not a complete diet: feed as an extra, not the whole diet.
  • 4 poor-graded ingredients make up about 28% of the recipe.
  • Low in protein: 6% protein on a dry-matter basis.

Who is this food for?

Suits

  • Labelled by the manufacturer for all lifestages
  • Doesn't list chicken, beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients

Consider something else if:

  • Your dog avoids grain: the label lists wheat
  • You need more protein than this: 6.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band

These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.

What the label tells us

  • The label lists 14 ingredients.
  • Names its animal sources (1 named ingredient).
  • Every animal ingredient is a named source.
  • Lists no artificial colours or preservatives.
  • Prints no ingredient quantities.
Why is this treat not scored?

Our 1 to 100 rating applies to complete diets, so treats and complementary foods are presented as what the label tells us rather than a number that would invite comparison with complete meals.

What should I look for on a treat label?

A short ingredient list, named animal sources instead of generic terms, and no artificial colours or preservatives. Printed quantities are a good transparency signal, though few treat labels provide them.

These points are derived from the published ingredient list, not a rating.

Nutrition and feedingProtein 5% · Fat 15%

Typical analysis (as fed)

NutrientAs fed
Protein5%
Fat15%
Fibre2%
Moisture20%

Energy: 403.7 kcal/100g

Additives & feeding info

Additives declared on the label

Technological additives

citric acid (preservative); vinegar (preservative); mixed tocopherols (preservative)

Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated

Estimated composition

  • additive 44.2%
  • carb 26.2%
  • oil 8.6%
  • fibre 8.3%
  • meat 7.6%
  • veg 5.0%
#As declaredMatchedLabel readingDeclared %Est. %
1Wheat flourWheatcarb · poor-9.3
2honeyHoneycarb · medium-9.0
3vegetable oilVegetable oiloil · medium-8.6
4carob powderCarob Flourfibre · medium-8.3
5dried cane molassesCane Molassescarb · medium-8.0
6dried whole eggDried Whole Eggmeat · good-7.6
7sodium bicarbonateSodium Bicarbonateadditive · medium-7.3
8natural vanilla flavorFlavoradditive · poor-7.0
9citric acidCitric Acidadditive · medium-6.6
10natural marshmallow flavorFlavoradditive · poor-6.3
11baking powderBaking powderadditive · medium-6.0
12vinegarVinegaradditive · poor-5.6
13mixed tocopherolsTocopherolsadditive · good-5.3
14rosemary extractRosemaryveg · good-5.0
  1. 1. Wheat flour9.3% estimated
    Wheat · carb · poor
  2. 2. honey9.0% estimated
    Honey · carb · medium
  3. 3. vegetable oil8.6% estimated
    Vegetable oil · oil · medium
  4. 4. carob powder8.3% estimated
    Carob Flour · fibre · medium
  5. 5. dried cane molasses8.0% estimated
    Cane Molasses · carb · medium
  6. 6. dried whole egg7.6% estimated
    Dried Whole Egg · meat · good
  7. 7. sodium bicarbonate7.3% estimated
    Sodium Bicarbonate · additive · medium
  8. 8. natural vanilla flavor7.0% estimated
    Flavor · additive · poor
  9. 9. citric acid6.6% estimated
    Citric Acid · additive · medium
  10. 10. natural marshmallow flavor6.3% estimated
    Flavor · additive · poor
  11. 11. baking powder6.0% estimated
    Baking powder · additive · medium
  12. 12. vinegar5.6% estimated
    Vinegar · additive · poor
  13. 13. mixed tocopherols5.3% estimated
    Tocopherols · additive · good
  14. 14. rosemary extract5.0% estimated
    Rosemary · veg · good

Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-29

Brand and contact: Three Dog Bakery
Phone
1-800-487-3287
Contact page
threedog.com

Trust and provenance

Recall history
No recalls recorded in our database
Label data last checked
2026-09-29
Product page
threedog.com

Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.

External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.

Trustpilot: 3.7/5 · 1 reviews

Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.

Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence

Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated

Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.

ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+1.73
Carb share of dry matter26.9%-0.115-3.10
Oil share of dry matter9.8%-0.092-0.90
Additive share of dry matter45.7%0.163+7.44
Recipe graded poor28.2%-0.065-1.83
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient9.3%0.060+0.56
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
Additive penalty-53.200.222-11.81
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Show all 40 components
ComponentInputCoefficientContribution
Base score-30.909+30.91
Average ingredient quality0.29.191+1.73
Meat share of dry matter0.0%0.096+0.00
Carb share of dry matter26.9%-0.115-3.10
Oil share of dry matter9.8%-0.092-0.90
Vegetable share of dry matter0.9%-0.005-0.00
Additive share of dry matter45.7%0.163+7.44
Supplement share of dry matter0.0%-0.012+0.00
Other share of dry matter0.0%-0.375+0.00
Unrecognised share of dry matter0.0%-0.027+0.00
Recipe graded poor28.2%-0.065-1.83
Poor-quality meat in recipe0.0%-0.179+0.00
Number of poor ingredients4-0.876-3.50
Largest single poor ingredient9.3%0.060+0.56
Undeclared quantities100.0%-0.106-10.56
Prints ingredient percentagesno0.000+0.00
Complete dietno2.294+0.00
Frozen or chilled freshno0.000+0.00
High meat (30%+ of dry matter)no0.707+0.00
Low meat (under 10% of dry matter)yes-3.158-3.16
High carb and low meatno-1.180+0.00
Meat share × printed percentages0.00.000+0.00
Meat share × fresh0.00.000+0.00
Fresh × high meat0.011.084+0.00
Additive penalty-53.200.222-11.81
Processing multiplier0.9833.786+33.11
Processing: Rawno-0.054+0.00
Processing: Fresh Chilledno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Frozenno-2.354+0.00
Processing: Fresh Refrigeratedno0.000+0.00
Processing: Fresh Shelfno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Dry Freeze Driedno6.629+0.00
Processing: Dry Air Driedno6.331+0.00
Processing: Dry Cold Pressedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Bakedno-6.713+0.00
Processing: Dry Extrudedyes-6.713-6.71
Processing: Dry Semi Moistno-6.174+0.00
Processing: Dry Mueslino-10.146+0.00
Processing: Wet Pateno-0.672+0.00
Processing: Wet Chunksno-0.672+0.00
Processing-type offset
+0.02
Additives declared on label
+1 transparency bonus
Subtotal
33.2
Final score
33/100

Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.

This is not a complete diet, so the 1-100 rating does not apply to it. Read the recipe breakdown above as ingredient-quality context only.

Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges

Not applicable to complementary food. FEDIAF reference ranges apply to complete diets.

Transparency: what the label discloses

How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.

ItemPoints
✓ Ingredient list on the label (mandatory)10/10
✗ Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file0/20
✗ Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file0/15
✓ Additives declared (mandatory)5/10
✓ Energy value declared (voluntary)5/5
✓ Complete/complementary designation (mandatory)5/5
✗ Feeding guidance given (mandatory) - not on file0/10
✓ Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory)5/10
✓ Country of manufacture stated (voluntary)10/10
✗ Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file0/5

Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Feeding guidance given, Batch and date labelling).

Safety: recall history

Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.

No recalls recorded in our database.

See all current recalls we track.

Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it

The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.

Claims on file; none we can check against the label

ClaimTypeCheckSubstantiation
creamy carob-flavored wafers (a pup-safe and healthy chocolate-flavor replacement) (on page)Functionalnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Drool-worthy aroma and no artificial flavors (on page)Free-fromnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Crafted with real ingredients sure to please your pup's tastebuds (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion
Bites inspired by our favorite holiday drink – made with real carob (on page)Contentnot checkableManufacturer assertion

The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.

See all products from Three Dog Bakery

Community0 comments

Owners' verdict
0 votes

Comments (0)

No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.

Comments are reviewed before they appear.