veterinary diet
This is a medical nutrition decision. Speak to your vet.
This is a veterinary diet product: a "dietetic" feed designed for a particular nutritional purpose and intended for use under veterinary direction. The score and figures below are readings of the label, the same as for any other food: they can't tell you whether this product is right for your dog.
Hill's Pet Nutrition Prescription Diet t/d Small Bites Chicken Flavor Dry Dog Food
Dry Extruded · completeveterinary diet
Our verdict
Is Hill's Pet Nutrition Prescription Diet t/d Small Bites Chicken Flavor Dry Dog Food a good dog food?
We score it 43/100 (Poor). The main reasons are set out in "Why you might not" below, and every step of the calculation is shown under "How we calculated this score".
Only part of the analytical constituents are declared, so the nutritional picture is incomplete.
100% of this recipe has no printed percentage. Estimated shares are model estimates, not label facts.
Who is this food for?
Suits
- Labelled by the manufacturer for adult dogs
- Single named protein: chicken
- Doesn't list beef, turkey, lamb, fish, venison, pork, duck as ingredients
Consider something else if:
- Your dog avoids grain: the label lists rice - white
- You need more protein than this: 18.3% on a dry-matter basis is in the low band
These points are derived from declared ingredients and analysis, not a substitute for veterinary advice. If your dog has a diagnosed condition, food choice is a medical nutrition decision: speak to your vet. Find foods that fit your dog.
Nutrition and feedingProtein 18.30% · Fat 16.50%
Typical analysis (as fed)
| Nutrient | As fed | Dry matter | Directory average |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.30% | 18.30% | 37.69% (137 eligible foods) |
| Fat | 16.50% | 16.50% | 23.89% (134 eligible foods) |
| Fibre | 10.80% | 10.80% | 3.81% (135 eligible foods) |
| Carbohydrates | 50% | 50% | 30.63% (76 eligible foods) |
| Calcium | 0.63% | - | - |
| Phosphorus | 0.45% | - | - |
| Sodium | 0.25% | - | - |
Energy: 347 kcal/100g
Additives & feeding info
Feeding and storage
Feeding guide
Adult maintenance: 2 lb (0.9 kg) 3/8 cup (25 g); 4 lb (1.8 kg) 3/4 cup (55 g); 6 lb (2.7 kg) 1 cup (70 g); 8 lb (3.6 kg) 1 1/4 cup (90 g); 10 lb (4.5 kg) 1 3/8 cup (100 g); 15 lb (6.8 kg) 1 7/8 cup (135 g); 20 lb (9.1 kg) 2 1/3 cup (165 g). Gradually transition over 7 days; exclusively feed recommended Prescription Diet dry and wet foods; keep fresh water available.
Additives declared on the label
Nutritional additives
Vitamin E 746 IU/kg; Vitamin C 190 ppm
Ingredients (14)100% of the recipe is estimated
Estimated composition
- meat 22.9%
- carb 18.3%
- supplement 16.6%
- fibre 15.9%
- oil 14.6%
- additive 11.6%
| # | As declared | Matched | Label reading | Declared % | Est. % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brewers Rice | Rice - white | carb · medium | - | 9.3 |
| 2 | Whole Grain Corn | Whole-Grain Maize | carb · medium | - | 9.0 |
| 3 | Chicken By-Product Meal | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 8.6 |
| 4 | Powdered Cellulose | Powdered Cellulose | fibre · poor | - | 8.3 |
| 5 | Chicken Fat | Chicken Oil and Fat | oil · good | - | 8.0 |
| 6 | Soybean Hulls | Soybean Hulls | fibre · medium | - | 7.6 |
| 7 | Egg Product | Egg | meat · good | - | 7.3 |
| 8 | Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor | Chicken | meat · medium | - | 7.0 |
| 9 | Soybean Oil | Soybean oil | oil · medium | - | 6.6 |
| 10 | Lactic Acid | Lactic Acid | additive · medium | - | 6.3 |
| 11 | Potassium Chloride | Potassium Chloride | supplement · medium | - | 6.0 |
| 12 | Calcium Sulfate | Calcium Carbonate | supplement · medium | - | 5.6 |
| 13 | Iodized Salt | Salt | additive · poor | - | 5.3 |
| 14 | L-Lysine | Lysine | supplement · medium | - | 5.0 |
- 1. Brewers Rice9.3% estimated
- 2. Whole Grain Corn9.0% estimated
- 3. Chicken By-Product Meal8.6% estimated
- 4. Powdered Cellulose8.3% estimated
- 5. Chicken Fat8.0% estimated
- 6. Soybean Hulls7.6% estimated
- 7. Egg Product7.3% estimated
- 8. Hydrolyzed Chicken Flavor7.0% estimated
- 9. Soybean Oil6.6% estimated
- 10. Lactic Acid6.3% estimated
- 11. Potassium Chloride6.0% estimated
- 12. Calcium Sulfate5.6% estimated
- 13. Iodized Salt5.3% estimated
- 14. L-Lysine5.0% estimated
Trust and sourceNo recalls recorded in our database · checked 2026-09-18
Brand and contact: Hill's Pet Nutrition
- Website
- https://www.hillspet.com/
- Contact page
- www.hillspet.com
Trust and provenance
- Recall history
- No recalls recorded in our database
- Label data last checked
- 2026-09-18
- Scored with
- Model v3 (methodology)
- Product page
- www.hillspet.com
Recall history is presentation-only and never affects the score. Dates are when we recorded the data, not when the manufacturer last changed the recipe.
Brand and retailer reviews
External platform ratings are not scores for this individual recipe.
Trustpilot: 3.0/5 · 3 reviews
Spotted a mistake in this listing? Report it here and we'll take a look.
Score details and methodologyCalculations, history and evidence
Recipe: how the 1-100 score is calculated
Why this score?
This food scored 43 out of 100. Undeclared ingredient shares came in at -10.6 points, because some ingredients are listed without printed percentages, and the processing format contributed -6.7 points while the additive load contributed -3.1 points. The overall quality of the ingredient list added +2.9 points, partly offsetting those deductions. This is a general explanation of how the score works, not veterinary advice. For any health condition, food choice is a decision for your vet.
Scored with model v3 on 2026-10-25. Each component is the feature value for this product multiplied by the model's published coefficient.
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.89 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.5% | -0.115 | -2.13 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.6% | -0.092 | -1.53 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 12.0% | 0.163 | +1.96 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Recipe graded poor | 13.6% | -0.065 | -0.89 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.3% | 0.060 | +0.50 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| Additive penalty | -14.06 | 0.222 | -3.12 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
Show all 40 components
| Component | Input | Coefficient | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base score | - | 30.909 | +30.91 |
| Average ingredient quality | 0.3 | 9.191 | +2.89 |
| Meat share of dry matter | 0.0% | 0.096 | +0.00 |
| Carb share of dry matter | 18.5% | -0.115 | -2.13 |
| Oil share of dry matter | 16.6% | -0.092 | -1.53 |
| Vegetable share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.005 | +0.00 |
| Additive share of dry matter | 12.0% | 0.163 | +1.96 |
| Supplement share of dry matter | 17.6% | -0.012 | -0.21 |
| Other share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.375 | +0.00 |
| Unrecognised share of dry matter | 0.0% | -0.027 | +0.00 |
| Recipe graded poor | 13.6% | -0.065 | -0.89 |
| Poor-quality meat in recipe | 0.0% | -0.179 | +0.00 |
| Number of poor ingredients | 2 | -0.876 | -1.75 |
| Largest single poor ingredient | 8.3% | 0.060 | +0.50 |
| Undeclared quantities | 100.0% | -0.106 | -10.56 |
| Prints ingredient percentages | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Complete diet | yes | 2.294 | +2.29 |
| Frozen or chilled fresh | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| High meat (30%+ of dry matter) | no | 0.707 | +0.00 |
| Low meat (under 10% of dry matter) | yes | -3.158 | -3.16 |
| High carb and low meat | no | -1.180 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × printed percentages | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Meat share × fresh | 0.0 | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Fresh × high meat | 0.0 | 11.084 | +0.00 |
| Additive penalty | -14.06 | 0.222 | -3.12 |
| Processing multiplier | 0.98 | 33.786 | +33.11 |
| Processing: Raw | no | -0.054 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Chilled | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Frozen | no | -2.354 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Refrigerated | no | 0.000 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Fresh Shelf | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Freeze Dried | no | 6.629 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Air Dried | no | 6.331 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Cold Pressed | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Baked | no | -6.713 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Extruded | yes | -6.713 | -6.71 |
| Processing: Dry Semi Moist | no | -6.174 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Dry Muesli | no | -10.146 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Pate | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
| Processing: Wet Chunks | no | -0.672 | +0.00 |
- Processing-type offset
- +0.02
- Additives declared on label
- +1 transparency bonus
- Subtotal
- 42.6
- Final score
- 43/100
Contributions are rounded to two decimals, so they may not sum exactly to the subtotal. The full coefficient table is published on the methodology page.
Nutritional: declared analysis vs reference ranges
How the declared analysis compares with FEDIAF reference ranges for adult dogs. The label prints as-fed values; we convert to a dry-matter basis before scoring, and the bands are dry-matter ranges. Scores rise to 100 at the band midpoint: the reference is adequacy, not maximisation. Nutrients with a published upper limit taper again above it; fat is policed through calorie density rather than a direct penalty.
Guaranteed-analysis FEDIAF score: crude minimums and maximums are bounds, not typical values; moisture (a maximum) uses the processing median where available; experimental US score.
| Nutrient | As fed (label) | Dry matter (scored) | Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 18.3 | 20.2 (band 18 to 40%) | 76.1 |
| Fat | 16.5 | 18.2 (band 5.5 to 20%) | 100 |
| Fibre | 10.8 | 11.9 (band 0.5 to 5%) | 100 |
| Calcium | 0.63 | 0.7 (band 0.5 to 2.5%) | 75.9 |
| Phosphorus | 0.45 | 0.5 (band 0.4 to 1.6%) | 74.9 |
| Sodium | 0.25 | 0.3 (band 0.1+%) | 100 |
| Calcium:phosphorus ratio | 1.4 | 1.4 (band 1 to 2%) | 94 |
| Energy (kcal/100g) | 347 | 383.4 | 100 |
Fibre: Declared as a maximum; the high-fibre taper is not applied.
Scored over 8 declared nutrients (combined weight 95); undeclared nutrients do not affect the score. Moisture was not declared and was estimated at 9.5% from the food type.
Declared fortification: 2 nutritional additives on the label
- Vitamin E 746 IU/kg
- Vitamin C 190 ppm
Low confidence: partial analysis or moisture estimated from the food type.
This measures agreement with published reference ranges, not suitability for an individual dog. For medical conditions, follow veterinary guidance.
Transparency: what the label discloses
How much the manufacturer discloses, measured against the FEDIAF Code of Good Labelling Practice and Regulation 767/2009. Mandatory items dominate the weighting.
| Item | Points |
|---|---|
| Ingredient list on the label (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Printed percentages on the label (voluntary) - not on file | 0/20 |
| Analytical constituents declared (mandatory) - not on file | 0/15 |
| Additives declared (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Energy value declared (voluntary) | 5/5 |
| Complete/complementary designation (mandatory) | 5/5 |
| Feeding guidance given (mandatory) | 10/10 |
| Manufacturer identity and address (mandatory) | 5/10 |
| Country of manufacture stated (voluntary) | 10/10 |
| Batch and date labelling (mandatory) - not on file | 0/5 |
Capped at 60: mandatory items missing (Analytical constituents declared, Batch and date labelling).
Safety: recall history
Recall and safety-notice history, time-decayed. This dimension is shown alongside the score and never feeds the headline number.
No recalls recorded in our database.
See all current recalls we track.
Evidence: what the brand claims, and what supports it
The claims made on the pack and product page, checked against the declared label. We record claims as stated; "consistent" means our stored label data supports the claim, "contradicted" means it conflicts with it. Functional claims are recorded but never scored.
100/100 · moderate — 1 checkable claim: 1 consistent, 0 contradicted.
Consistent with the label
- "Complete and balanced nutrition for maintenance of adult dogs" — supported by the declared complete and balanced data.
6 further claims on file that we cannot check against the label.
Moderate: every checkable claim is consistent with the declared label.
| Claim | Type | Check | Substantiation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unique fiber matrix is clinically shown to clean up to the gum line by helping reduce plaque, stain, & tartar buildup. (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Exclusive feeding has been shown to be more effective than toothbrushing. (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Formulated to promote a urinary environment that reduces the risk of developing struvite & calcium oxalate crystals (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Accepted for the reduction of buildup of both plaque & tartar by Veterinary Oral Health Council (VOHC) (on pack) | Functional | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| U.S. Veterinarians' #1 Recommended Brand (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| 100% Satisfaction guarantee (on pack) | Content | not checkable | Manufacturer assertion |
| Complete and balanced nutrition for maintenance of adult dogs (on pack) | Content | consistent | Manufacturer assertion |
The full scoring method is published. See the methodology for exactly how the headline score and each dimension are calculated.
Community0 comments
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share how this went down with your dog.